Co-occurrence of mosquito larvae in stagnant water in residential areas in Malaysia

Open access

Abstract

Background: The importance of mosquito-borne diseases can be aggravated when there is an occurrence of mixed infestation between the mosquitoes in a habitat. However, there is limited available information on mixed infestation behavior among Malaysian mosquitoes.

Objective: We elucidated the nature of co-occurrence among mosquito species from residential areas in Malaysia.

Methods: Entomological investigation was carried out by using a previously described larval dipping method in 20 residential areas across 11 states and a federal territory (i.e., Kuala Lumpur) in Peninsular Malaysia as well as two states in East Malaysia.

Results: Of 20 study sites, eight study sites exhibited co-occurrence of mosquito larvae, ranging from 1.28% to 50.00%. Culex quinquefasciatus was able to breed simultaneously with Cx. gelidus (10.00%-50.00%), Lutzia fuscanus (2.94%-13.33%), Cx. vishnui (5.00%) and Armigeres subalbatus (1.28%-3.77%). On the other hand, Cx. vishnui was able to breed simultaneously with Cx. gelidus (20.00%) and Lu. fuscanus (3.33%).

Conclusion: The findings of this study have implications for the development of a better understanding of their mixed infestation behavior and prevention of vector-borne disease transmission from these study sites.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Miyagi I Toma T. The mosquitoes of Southeast Asia. In: Ng FSP Yong HS editors. Mosquitoes and mosquitoe-borne diseases: biology surveillance control personal and public protection measures. Kuala Lumpur: Academy of Science Malaysia; 2000.

  • 2. Chen CD Nazni WA Lee HL Seleena B Mohd Masri S Chiang YF et al. Mixed breeding of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus Skuse in four dengue endemic areas in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2006; 23:224-7.

  • 3. Wan-Norafikah O Chen CD Soh HN Lee HL Nazni WA Sofian-Azirun M. Surveillance of Aedes mosquitoes in a university campus in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2009; 26:206-15.

  • 4. Rohani A Wan Najdah WMA Zamree I Azahari AH Mohd NI Rahimi H et al. Habitat characterization and mapping of Anopheles maculatus (Theobald) mosquito larvae in malaria endemic areas in Kuala Lipis Pahang Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010; 41:821-30.

  • 5. Hidayati H Sofian-Azirun M Nazni WA Lee HL. Insecticide resistance development in Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) larvae against malathion permethrin and temephos. Trop Biomed. 2005; 22:45-52.

  • 6. Mendoza F Ibanez-Bernal S Cabrero-Sanudo FJ. A standardized sampling method to estimate mosquito richness and abundance for research and public health surveillance programmes. Bull Entomol Res. 2008; 98: 323-32.

  • 7. Rattanarithikul R Harbach RE Harrison BA Panthusiri P Jones JW Coleman RE. Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand II. Genera Culex and Lutzia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005; 36:1-97.

  • 8. Rattanarithikul R Harrison BA Harbach RE Panthusiri P Coleman RE Panthusiri P. Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand. IV. Anopheles. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006; 37:1-128.

  • 9. Braks MAH Honorio NA Lounibos LP Lourenço-De-Oliveira R Juliano SA. Interspecific competition between two invasive species of container mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Brazil. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2004; 97:130-39.

  • 10. Costanzo KS Mormann K Juliano SA. Asymmetrical competition and patterns of abundance of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2005; 42:559-70.

  • 11. Paaijmansa KP Huijbena S Githekoc AK Takken W. Competitive interactions between larvae of the malaria mosquitoes Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae under semi-field conditions in western Kenya. Acta Trop. 2009; 109:124-30.

  • 12. Chan KL Chan YC Ho BC. Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) in Singapore City. Bull World Health Organ.1971; 44:643-9.

  • 13. Reiskind MH Wilson ML. Interspecific competition between larval Culex restuans Theobald and Culex pipiens L.(Diptera: Culicidae) in Michigan. J Med Entomol. 2008; 45:20-7.

  • 14. Leisnham PT Juliano SA. Spatial and temporal patterns of coexistence between competing Aedes mosquitoes in urban Florida. Oecologia. 2009; 160:343-52.

  • 15. Tubaki RM Menezes RMTD Vesgueiro FT Cardoso RP. Observations on Haemagogus janthinomys Dyar (Diptera: Culicidae) and other mosquito populations within tree holes in a gallery forest in the northwestern region of Sao Paulo State Brazil. Neotrop Entomol. 2010; 39:664-70.

  • 16. Hribar LJ. Larval habitats of potential mosquito vectors of West Nile virus in the Florida Keys. J Water Health. 2007; 5:97-100.

  • 17. Muturi EJ Mwangangi J Shililu J Muriu S Jacob B Kabiru E et al. Mosquito species succession and physicochemical factors affecting their abundance in rice fields in Mwea Kenya. J Med Entomol. 2007; 44:336-44.

  • 18. Muturi EJ Mwangangi J Shililu J Jacob BG Mbogo C Githure J et al. Environmental factors associated with the distribution of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus in a rice agro-ecosystem in Mwea Kenya. J Vec Ecol. 2008; 33:56-63.

  • 19. Devi NP Jauhari RK. Mosquito species associated within some western Himalayas phytogeographic zones in the Garhwal region of India. J Insect Sci. 2007; 7:1-10.

  • 20. Sirivanakarn S. The systematics of Culex vishnui complex in Southeast Asia with the diagnosis ofthree common species (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Sys. 1975; 7:69-85.

  • 21. Amerasinghe FP. Observations on the mosquitoes (Dipera: Culicidae) of Udawattakele Forest Sri Lanka. J Natn Sci Coun Sri Lanka. 1982; 10:81-97.

  • 22. Jin L Luo J Fu Y Xu S. Prey and feeding behavior of larval Culex (Lutzia) fuscanus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Shantou Guangdong Province China. J Med Entomol. 2006; 43:785-6.

  • 23. Low VL Chen CD Lee HL Lim PE Leong CS Sofian-Azirun M. Nationwide distribution of Culex mosquitoes and associated habitat characteristics at residential areas in Malaysia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2012; 28:160-9.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor
IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.2
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.293

CiteScore 2018: 0.30

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.172
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.237

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 385 205 2
PDF Downloads 164 93 5