In Homer and Langley, E.L. Doctorow’s 2009 novel of New York City, the author focuses on past Manhattan, which he sees as the epitome of his own self-destructive modern and contemporary society. I would argue that Doctorow acts here mainly to denounce excessive material culture in the context of egotistic, upper-class Manhattan dwelling at the end of the nineteenth century. I would also like to show that the novelist criticizes the idea of material progress along more than a hundred years, from the end of the nineteenth century, when the plot starts, to the beginning of the twenty-first century, when the novel was written. The self-contained, isolated world in the novel is the result of our society’s propensity for excessive production and consumption. At the same time, Homer and Langley brings to mind ideas of exhaustion of the human, who agrees to be literally replaced by objects. The fact that such a phenomenon occurs already at the end of the nineteenth century suggests that there might have never been a plenary moment of being human, as we have long entertained the closest possible relationship and even synthesis with the non-human world of objects and tools.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Baudrillard Jean. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. Trans. Chris Turner. London: Sage 1998.
Berman Marshall. All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin 1988.
Buck-Morss Susan. “Mythic History: Fetish.” Urban Culture: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies. Ed. Chris Jenks. London: Routledge 2004. 255-288.
Brooker Peter. New York Fictions: Modernity Postmodernism The New Modern. London: Longman 1996.
Clarke Bruce. Postmodern Metamorphosis. Narrative and Systems. New York: Fordham U P 2008.
Cohen Margaret. “Benjamin’s Phantasmagoria: The Arcades Project.” The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin. Ed. Davis S. Ferris. Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2004. 199-221.
Dirda Michael. “The Collyer Brothers: A Collective Obsession.” The Washington Post 3 Sept. 2009: 4.
Doctorow E.L. Homer and Langley. Kindle Edition: Random 2009.
Giles J.R. Violence in the Contemporary American Novel. Columbia: U of South Carolina 2000.
Herbrechter Stefan. Posthumanism. A Critical Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2013.
Kellner Douglas. “Jean Baudrillard.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E.N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford University 2014. Web. 12 Mar. 2015.
Koolhaas Rem. Delirious New York. New York: Monacelli P 2004.
Lyotard J.F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. 1984.
Miller Tyrus. “Glass Before its Time Premature Iron. Architecture Temporality and Dream in Benjamin’s Arcades Project.” Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Ed. Beatrice Hanssen. London: Continuum 2006. 240-259.
Oates Joyce Carol. “Love and Squalor: E.L. Doctorow Reimagines the Collyer Brothers.” The New Yorker 7 Sept. 2009: 80-83.
Rorty Richard. Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin 1999.
Schillinger Liesl. “The Odd Couple.” Sunday Book Review The New York Times. 8 Sept. 2009. Web. 30 Mar. 2018.
Secher Benjamin. “Homer and Langley by E.L. Doctorow: Review.” The Telegraph. 25 Jan. 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2018.
Sennett Richard. The Conscience of the Eye. New York London: Norton 1990.
Sharpe William. “Nostalgia and Connection in the Postmodern Metropolis.” Post Ex Sub Dis: Urban Fragmentations and Constructions. Ed. Ghent Urban Studies Team [GUST]. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers 2002. 238-281.
Tallack Douglas. “New York New York.” N.p. N.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2014.
Wutz Michael. “Literary Narrative and Information Culture: Garbage Waste and Residue in the Work of E.L. Doctorow.” Contemporary Literature 44.3 (2003): 501-535.