Aesthetic distance is a phenomenon that has attracted a considerable amount of attention, especially since the first works of postmodernism came to light. Aesthetic distance is based on creating such works which - using certain artistic tools and techniques - break the illusion and thus inhibit readers from immersing themselves in the literary world portrayed in the work they read. As a result, aesthetic distance creates a liminal space, or an invisible but consciously perceivable border between reality, i.e. the world we live in and fiction, i.e. the world we want to relocate to and enjoy during the reading process. The paper is based on an article by Bjorn Thomassen, in which he presents several types of liminality and states that the typology is not final. My aim is to prove that liminality can occur in literature as well, particularly in works built on aesthetic distance. In this matter, I focus on the reception theory of Wolfgang Iser, who studies literary texts from three perspectives: the text, the reader and the communication between the two. The theory is applied to selected short stories of American literature, which contain illusion-breaking features and thus may be viewed as liminal spaces.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Allen W. The Kugelmass Episode. Available at: http://www.woodyallen.art.pl/eng/kugelmass_episode.php
Barth J. 1980. Lost in the Funhouse. Available at: http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/fms/Colleges/College%20of%20Humanities%20and%20Social%20Sciences/EMS/Readings/139.105/Additional/Lost%20in%20the%20Funhouse%20-%20John%20Barth.pdf
Brautigan R. 1971. Revenge of the Lawn. NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Caron B. 2002. A Story With No Beginning. Available at: http://www.storymania.com/cgibin/sm2/smreadtitle.cgi?action=display&file=shortstories/CaronB-AStoryWithNoBeginning.htm
Davis L. Notes During Long Phone Conversation With Mother. Available at: http://fivedials.com/five-short-stories/
Davis L. Spring Spleen. Available at: https://biblioklept.org/2013/05/06/spring-spleen-lydiadavis/
Holub R. C. 1984. Reception Theory. Routhledge.
Iser W. 1980. The Act of Reading - A Theory of Aesthetic Response. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ratiani I. Liminality and the Liminal Theory of Conceptualizing Time and Space in 20th century Eschatological Anti-utopia. Translated by Chanturia A pp. 1-17. Available at: http://www.irmaratiani.ge/Liminality%20Nabokov.pdf
Ryan M-L. 2013. “Impossible Worlds and Aesthetic Illusion.” In Immersion and Distance: Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V. pp. 131-148.
Thomassen B. 2009. “The Uses and Meanings of Liminality.” In International Political Anthropology vol. 2 no. 1 pp. 5-27. Available at: http://www.moodlevda.lt/moodle/pluginfile.php/2205/mod_resource/content/0/8%20Thomassen%20-%20Uses%20and%20meanings%20of%20liminality.pdf
Wolf W. 2013. “Aesthetic Illusion.” In Immersion and Distance: Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V. pp. 1-63.