When they first reached an American readership, Jane Austen’s novels enjoyed mixed reactions among intellectuals. The main charge levelled against Jane Austen’s fiction was that it conflicted with the democratic principles American society was based on. The next century brought about an explosion in the attention paid to Jane Austen, whether via adaptations, spinoffs, biopics, musicals, detective fiction, scholarly texts, societies or even websites. Most of these creative extensions of Jane Austen’s ideas (and her personality) seem to embrace contemporary American values and sensibilities and therefore, logically, make attempts at revising some of the less palatable aspects of the English society of the Regency era. This paper focuses on two prime examples of such a revisionist approach to Jane Austen’s most classconscious novel, Emma, in Douglas McGrath’s eponymous 1996 film adaptation and in Clueless, Amy Heckerling’s 1995 satirical film based on the same novel.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Austen, J., 2000 . Emma. New York: Norton.
Bakhtin, M. M., 1971. The Dialogic Imagination. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Copeland, E. and J. McMaster (eds.), 1997. The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dole, C. M. 1998. “Austen, Class, and the American Market.” In: Troost, L. and S. Greenfield (eds.). Jane Austen in Hollywood. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, pp. 58-77.
Favret, M. A. 2000. “Free and Happy: Jane Austen in America.” In: Lynch, D. (ed.). Janeites: Austen’s Disciples and Devotees. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 166-177.
Parrill, S., 2002. Jane Austen on Film and Television: A Critical Study of the Adaptations. Jefferson: McFarland and Company.
Twain, M. 2004. “Jane Austen.” In: Auerbach, E. Searching for Jane Austen. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 306-308.
Walkley, A. B., 1924. “Mansfield Park and America.ˮ In American Mercury, vol. 1, pp. 320-322.