Ethnic humour in a multicultural society

Open access


The coexistence of different cultures in specific pluralistic settings not only has positive but also negative impacts. Besides exchanging cultural contents within a multicultural environment, societies use humour as a form of social interaction, which reinforces cultural interrelationships as well as ethnical differences. However, humour differs from culture to culture and from individual to individual. On the one hand, it develops social cohesion, fosters positive relations and increases the self-identification of the individual in relation to other ethnic groups, but on the other hand, it functions as an acceptable and tolerated form of aggression in a particular society. The bipolar character of humour stems from its status and functions. It serves both as a social unifier and a social separator. The most common paradigms of humour in social discourse are ethnic jokes or cartoons that are often built on fixed ethnic/racial stereotypes leading to social categorization but also to fast and correct decoding of semantic information by an audience. Ethnic jokes are social thermometers, recording and measuring the level of sensitivity towards specific cultural groups. The main aim of this paper is to introduce ethnic humour and its key functions in the context of ongoing cultural interactions and changes.



  • Allport, G. W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Apte, M. L. 1985. Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Apte, M. L. 1988. “Disciplinary boundaries in humorology: An anthropologist's ruminations.” In: HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-25.

  • Apte, M. L. 1987. Ethnic humor versus “sense of humor”. In: American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27-41.

  • Aristotle -4th century. 1954. De arte poetica. English translation: “Poetics.” In: Aristotle, Rhetoric. Poetics. New York: Random House, pp. 219-266.

  • Attardo, S. 1989. “A multiple-level analysis of jokes.” Contributed section. In: Newsletter, HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 438-439.

  • Attardo, S. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor: Humor research. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Attardo, S. and Raskin V. 1991. “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” In: HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 4, no. 3-4, pp. 293-347.

  • Babcock G. P. 1967. Webster's Third New International Dictionary. Springfield, Mass.: G. & C. Merriam.

  • Bačová, V. 1996. Etnická identita a historické zmeny. Štúdia obyvateľov vybraných obcí Slovenska. Bratislava: Veda.

  • Barth F. 1969. “Introduction.“ In: Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference, ed. F Barth, London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 9-38

  • Bergson, H. [1900]1993. Smích. Praha: Naše Vojsko.

  • Botík, J. 1991. “Etnicita ako základná kategória národopisnej vedy.“ In: Slovenský národopis, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 18-25.

  • Davies, Ch. 1990. Ethnic Humor Around the World: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Davies, Ch. 1997. “The Newfoundland joke: A Canadian phenomenon viewed in a comparative international perspective.” In: HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137-164.

  • Drabinová, D. 1999. “Etnické stereotypy a studující mládež.“ In: Gracová, B. Školní výuka dějepisu a překonávání stereotypních obrazů sousedních národů. Ostrava: Filozofická fakulta OU, pp. 5-49.

  • Eriksen, T. H. 2012. Etnicita a nacionalismus. Antropologické perspektivy. Praha: Slon.

  • Fine, G. A. 1987. With the boys: little league baseball and preadolescent culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Freud, S. 1905/1976. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

  • Freud, S. 2005. Vtip a jeho vztah k nevědomí. Praha: Šestá kniha.

  • Giddens, A. 1999. Sociologie. Praha: Argo.

  • Gruner, C. R. 1978. Understanding Laughter: The Workings of Wit and Humour. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

  • Gruner, C. R. 1997: The Game of Humour. A Comprehensive Theory of Why We Laugh. New Jersey: Transaction.

  • Hobbes, T. 1651 [1982], Leviathan, New York: Penguin.

  • Hobbes, T. 2009. Leviathan. Praha: Oikoymenh.

  • Kant, I. 1790. Kritik der Urtreilskraft. Berlin: Lagarde. English translation: Critique of Judgment. New York: Hafner, 1951.

  • Kant, I. 1975. Kritika soudnosti. Praha: Odeon.

  • Klein, D. N., & Kuiper, N. A. 2006. “Humor styles, peer relationships, and bullying in middle childhood.“ In: HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 4383-404.

  • Kuiper, N. A., Grimshaw, M., Leite, C., & Kirsh, G. 2004. “Humor is not always the best medicine: Specific components of sense of humor and psychological well-being.” In: Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 17, no. 1/2, pp. 1/2135-168.

  • Kuiper, N. A., Kirsh, G. A., & Leite, C. 2010. “Reactions to humorous comments and implicit theories of humor styles.” In: Europe's Journal of Psychology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3236-266.

  • Martin. R. A. 2007. The Psychology of Humor. An Integrative Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

  • McGhee, P. 1979. Humor. Its origin and development. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.

  • Monro, D. H. 1951. Argument of Laughter. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

  • Morreall, J. 1989. “Enjoying incongruity.” In: HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-18.

  • Morreall, J. 1991. “Humor and work.” In: HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, vol. 4, no. 3-4, pp. 359-373.

  • Morreall, J. 1987. The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. New York, SUNY.

  • Nakonečný, M. 1999. Sociální psychologie. Praha: Academia.

  • Plato 1975. Philebus. English translation: Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Rapp, A. 1951. The Origins of Wit and Humor. New York: Dutton.

  • Raskin, V. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Rusnák, J. 2002. „Správy z druhej ruky“: Komunikačné stereotypy a ich fungovanie v médiách. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity

  • Schopenhauer, A. 1998. Svět jako vůle a představa II. Pelhřimov: Nová tiskárna Pelhřimov.

  • Schultz, J. 1976. “A cognitive-developmental analysis of humour.” In: A. Chapman & H. Foot (eds.) Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications. London: Wiley, pp. 11-36.

  • Spencer, H., 1911. “On the Physiology of Laughter,” Essays on Education, Etc., London: Dent.

  • Suls, J. 1972. “A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and acrtoons: An informationprocessing analysis.” In: Goldstein & McGhee (eds.) The Psychology of Humour. New York: Academic Press, pp. 81-100.

  • Websters, A. M. 1967. The New International Dictionary of English Language, G and C Memman Company Massachusset.

  • Ziv, A. 1984. Personality and sense of humor. New York: Springer Pub. Co.

  • Ziv, A. 2010. “The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships.” In: Society, vol. 47, no.1, pp. 11-18.

Ars Aeterna

Literary Studies and Humanity

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 57 57 35
PDF Downloads 12 12 6