The concept of happiness in Night Zoo

Open access

Abstract

This paper deals with a psychoanalytic interpretation of the titular story. It is part of the first volume in the Hungarian anthology series entitled Night Zoo – An Anthology of Women’s Sexuality (‘Éjszakai Állatkert – Antológia a női szexualitásról’). The analysis focuses on the story Night Zoo (‘Éjszakai Állatkert’) written by Zsófia Bán according to Freud’s personality theory. The theory regards our psyche as divided into three parts. The id is the instinctual part of our mind that represents our sexual and hidden desires, the superego contains the moral conscience and the norms, and the ego mediates between the wishes of the id and the rules of the superego. The chosen short story seems to revolve around unfulfilled love between two people. But after critical reading, it is obvious that this is not a love story of two people, but the relationship lies between the narrator and her unfulfilled desires. There is an immense conflict between instincts and social expectations. The narrator’s id has a desire; she just wants to be happy and have harmony in her life. But the superego does not allow her to fulfill the desire. The ego is therefore instrumental in deciding what the correct decision is.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bán Zs. 2005. “Éjszakai állatkert” [Night Zoo]. In: Forgács-Gordon-Bódis (eds): Éjszakai állatkert – Antológia a női szexualitásról [Night Zoo - Anthology of Women’s Sexuality] Jaffa Kiadó Budapest.

  • Bán Zs. 2010. “Night Zoo.” In: The Kenyon Review New Series Vol. 32 No. 2 (SPRING 2010) [cit. 2019-01-02] pp. 41-47. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/406003037read-now=l&seq=3#page_scan_tab_contents>.

  • Bókay A. 1990. “A múzsák pszükhé és tudományaik” [Muses psyche and their science]. In: Helikon 1990/2-3 [cit. 2018-11-12]. Available at: <http://realj.mtak.hu/1218/l/HELIKON_1990.pdf>.

  • Chodorow N. 1996. “Feminizmus nöiség és Freud” [Feminism femininity and Freud] [cit. 2019-04-08]. Available at: <http://www.mtapi.hu/thalassa/a_folyoirat/e_szovegek/pdf/(07)19961/037-052_Chodorow.pdf>.

  • Freud S. 1982. “A pszichoanalízis foglalata.” In Sigmund Freud esszék. Gondolat Kiadó.

  • Freud S. 1997. Pszichoanalízis. Öt előadás 1909-ben a Worcesteri Clark Universityn [Psychoanalysis. Five performances in 1909 at Worcester Clark University] Kossuth Kiadó Budapest 1997.

  • Freud S. 2006. Bevezés a pszichoanalízisbe. [Introduction to Psychoanalysis] Budapest Gabo Kiadó. IPA. International Psychoanalytical Association: “About Psychoanalysis.” [cit. 2018-12-12] Available at: <http://www.ipa.world/IPA/en/Psychoanalytic_Treatment/AboutPsychoanalysis.aspx>.

  • Jánk I. 2015. “Egy kis Hiperkarma egy kis pszichológia.” [A little Hiperkarma a little psychology] [cit. 2018-12-18] Available at: <http://www.nyest.hu/hirek/egy-kis-hiperkarma-egykispszichologia>.

  • Pál – Újvári (eds.): “Szimbólumszótár” [Dictorinary of Symbols]. 2001. Balassi Kiadó. [cit. 2018-12-20] Available at: <http://www.balassikiado.hu/BB/netre/Net_szimbolum/szimbolumszotarl.htm#d0el010>.

  • Webl: 137. zsoltár: “Messze Babilonban.” [137. Psalm: Far in Babylon] [cit. 2018-12-22] Available at: <https://www.szepi.hu/nota/zsoltar/zl37.png>.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.781

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 100 100 18
PDF Downloads 68 68 11