In order to demonstrate an aspect in which the novel is relatable to the canon of absurdism and enrich the view of dimensions in which it functions, the purpose of the following article is a reading of Flann O’Brien’s The Third Policeman in relation to the Absurd as an ontological category of existentialism and absurdism. Firstly, some assumptions already made on account of the novel are introduced. Secondly, the relevant and chosen characteristics of the Absurd are summarized in relation to Kierkegaard’s and Camus’s conceptions of the Absurd. Then, the novel is interpreted in relation to the insufficiency of human knowledge and rational thought in terms of achieving comprehension transcending existence. Lastly, the novel is interpreted in relation to the narrator’s fear of death, with death as an element transcending existence and adding to its irrationality. Overall, the way in which the novel depicts a specific contraction resulting in the Absurd is illustrated.
Booker M. K. 1995. Flann O’Brien Bakhtin andMenippean Satire. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Borg R. Fagan P. McCourt J (eds.). 2017. Flann O’Brien: Problems With Authority. Cork: Cork University Press.
Camus A. 1975. Myth of Sisyphus. London: Penguin Books.
Cosgrave B. 1976. “Flann O’Brien. A Critical Introduction to His Writings by Anne Clissmann.” In: Irish University Review vol. 6 n. l. pp. 122-124.
Cronin A. 1998. No Laughing Matter: The Life and Times of Flann O’Brien. NewYork: Fromm International Publishing Corporation.
Dulebová I. 2014.: K otázke reflexie náboženskej skúsenosti v ruskej próze 21. storočia In: World literature studies vol. 6 n. 1 pp. 33-46.
Flann O. 1996. The Third Policeman. Dublin: DalkeyArchive Press.
Heidegger M. 2010. Being and Time. Albany: State University ofNew York Press.
Hopper K. 2009. Flann O ’Brien: A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Post-Modernist. Cork: Cork University Press.
Hrabák J. 1973. Poetika. Prague: Československý spisovatel.
Kierkegaard S. 1941. The Sickness Unto Death. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kierkegaard S. 1967. Søren Kierkegaard’s Journals and Papers Volume 1. Hong H. and Hong E. (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kierkegaard S. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. Hong H. and Hong E. (eds.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Leonova E.A. 2010. Nemeckaja literatúra XX. veka: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: Flinta.
Long M. 2014. AssemblingFlann O’Brien. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
McDonald R. 2014. “An Astonishing Parade of Nullity: Nihilism in The Third Policeman.” In: Murphet J. McDonald R. and Morrel S. (eds.). Flann O ’Brien & Modernism. London: Bloomsbury Academic pp. 117-126.
Nietzsche F. 2003. The Gay Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perez M. Klimková S. 2016. “Linguistic and cultural determinacy of Deaf humour.” In: XLinguae vol. 9 n. 4 pp. 108-115.
Pilný O. 2014. “Brain O’Nolan and Pataphysics.” In: Borg R. Fagan P. and Huber W. (eds.). Flann O’Brien: Contesting Legacies. Cork: CorkUniversity Press pp. 156-165.
Schufreider G. 1983. “The Logic of the Absurd.” In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research vol. 44 n. 1 pp. 61-83.