Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 45 items for :

  • research misconduct x
Clear All
Open access

Elizabeth Wager

-publishers-murdoch-socialist Accessed:19 July 2012. 14. Wager E. Coping with scientific misconduct. BMJ. 2011; 343: d6586. 15. Callaway E. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature. 2011; 479: 15. 16. Marcus A. Japanese anesthesiologist fabricated data in 172 studies. Anesthesiology News July 2, 2012. Available at: http://www.anesthesiologynews.com//ViewArticle. aspx?ses=ogst&d=Web+Exclusives&d_id=175&i=ISSUE%3a+June+2012&i_id=854&a_id=21194 Accessed: July 19, 2012. 17. Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature. Lessons from the

Open access

Elizabeth Wager

-policies/sample-correspondence-for-aneditorial- office/ Accessed: Aug 20, 2014. 4. Wager E. Coping with scientific misconduct. BMJ 2011; 343: d6586. 5. Elsevier. Publishing Ethics Resource Kit (PERK). Available at: http://www.elsevier.com/editors/perk Accessed: Aug 20, 2014. 6. Wager E, Kleinert S. Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors. A position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Available at http://publicationethics.org/files/International%20sta ndards_authors_for%20website_11_Nov_2011.pdf Accessed: Aug 20, 2014

Open access

Roman Morawski

. (2008). Etica y mundo technológico. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Habermas, J. (1983). Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Bergman, J. (2004). Why the epidemic of fraud exists in science today. Journal of Creation (previously called TJ) , 18(3), 104-109. Whitbeck, C. (1998). Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. Morawski, R. Z. (2010). Ethical Aspects of Empirical Research

Open access

Ronald N. Kostoff

inspection. No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published.” He concluded that “when the FDA finds significant departures from good clinical practice, those findings are seldom reflected in the peer-reviewed literature, even when there is evidence of data fabrication or other forms of research misconduct.” He provided additional perspective in a Slate magazine article ( Seife, 2015b ). B FDA Safety Shortcuts In an interview with Truthout magazine

Open access

Mohsen Koushan, Akbar Pejhan, Nematullah Shomoossi and Azam Shomoossi

References 1. Sadeghi K. Metric Yardstick: The status of EFL research evaluation in Iran. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 2010, 19:475-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3860/taper.v19i3.1855 2. Habibzadeh F. A bird’s eye view of science publishing and editing in Iran. Eur Sci Edit 2006;32:98-100. 3. Shomoossi N, Kooshan M.Success in Getting Articles Published by Iranian Medical Researchers:The Role of English Language. MidEast J SciRes 2011;7:689-94. 4. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence-based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ 1995; 310

Open access

Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences

The Journal of ID Design 2012/DOOEL Skopje, Republic of Macedonia on behalf of the Macedonian Donor Registry (MKDR), Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

Open access

Limnological Review

The Journal of Polish Limnological Society

Open access

Koroze a ochrana materialu

The Journal of Association of Corrosion Engineers (Asociace korozních inženýru)

Open access