Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 1,662 items for :

  • rationality x
Clear All
Open access

Fernando Birman

, John. 2007. Is Rationality Normative? Disputatio 23 (2): 161–178. de Finetti, Bruno. 1937. La Prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7 (1): 1–68. Ditlevsen, Ove. 1994. Distribution Arbitrariness in Structural Reliability. In Structural Safety and Reliability , edited by G. Schueller, M. Shinozuka & J. Yao. Leiden: Balkema. Dubois, Didier & Henri Prade. 1980. Fuzzy Sets and Systems . New York: Academic Press. Dubois, Didier, Henri Prade & Ronald Yager. 1996. Fuzzy Information

Open access

Jan Chmielewski and Waldemar Hoff

Union states), Warszawa: Krajowa Szkoła Administracji Publicznej. Lianos, I. and Geradin, D. (2013). Handbook on European Competition Law: Substantive Aspects. Cheltenham-Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Miller, R. Le Roy (2010). Economics Today. Pearson. Machelski, T. (2011). Racjonalność ekonomiczna jako podstawa legalności aktów normatywnych organów samorządu terytorialnego (Economic rationality as basis for the legality of acts of the local government). Finanse Komunalne, 7-8. Matczak, M

Open access

Maureen Maloney and Alma McCarthy

attitudes towards PRSAs on their employees’ choices to save for retirement. The presence or absence of employee members in pension schemes may be explained, in part, by the attitudes and decision-making processes of the small employers whichare formed within the legal and institutional environment shaped by government and pension providers. Adopting bounded rationality as the theoretical perspective on decision-making, the current paper aims to illuminate small employers’ decision-making processes on pension provision. Bounded rationality proposes that the decision

Open access

Dorel Badea and Dumitru Iancu

Abstract

Modeling the acquisition decision and, consequently, managing the capabilities of technical systems involves multiple options that need to be optimized first, based on universal constraints such as time, quality, cost, etc. The criterion of use (private or institutional), according to which analyzes can evolve differently, is also important. Regardless of the way in which these considerations are taken, there is always a difference of approach given by the quantitative and / or qualitative tools used but also by biases, heuristics and mindsets. The article analyzes succinctly, on an example of calculation (based on a matrix used in the theory of decision to evaluate the different alternatives made available, when we have a basic model to be referred to), the universe of these analytical modalities, underlining the idea of making analyzes using a maximum level of objectivity and minimizing as much as possible subjectivism. It has been chosen as a way of applying the field of procurement of technical systems with the possibility of highlighting as many aspects as possible on the decisional criteria. Critical analysis of the robustness of the choices made by the human factor as a rational decision-maker is presented, as it is seen in the classical economic theory, but taking into account the limitations highlighted by modern theories in the fields of psychology and information theory

Open access

John Broome

References Broome, John. 2005. Does rationality give us reasons? Philosophical Issues 15: 321–37. Broome, John. 2006. ‘Reasoning with preferences?’ In Preference Formation and Well-Being , ed. by Serena Olsaretti. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Broome, John. 2007a. Wide or narrow scope? Mind 116: 359–70. Broome, John 2007b. ‘Requirements’. In Homage à Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz , ed. by Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen, Björn Petersson, Jonas Josefsson and Dan Egonsson, at www

Open access

Aleksander Kaczmarek, Krzysztof Przybyszewski, Dorota Rutkowska and Honorata Sosnowska

. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. Kowalski, T. (2002). The Simonian bounded rationality hypothesis and the expectation formation mechanism. Poznań University of Economics Review, 2(1), 5-24. Kuhberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23-55. Kuhberger, A., Schulte-Meckleenbeck, M., & Perner, J. (1999). The effect of framing reflection

Open access

Giancarlo Zanet

: Clarendon Press. Davidson, Donald. 2004. Problems of Rationality . Oxford: Clarendon Press. Dennett, Daniel C. 1987. Intentional Stance . Cambridge, MA - London: MIT Press. Elian, Naomi, Hoerl, Cristoph, McCormack, Teresa & Roesseler, Johannes (eds.). 2005. Joint Attention: Communication and other minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fodor, Jerry 1987. Psychosemantics . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gallese, Vittorio. 2001. The ‘‘shared manifold’’ hypothesis: From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5–7): 33

Open access

Jesús Adrian Cerda Rodriguez, Mustapha Lahyane, Osvaldo Osuna-Castro, Gioia Failla and Israel Moreno-Mejia

-580. [4] A. Campillo, O. Piltant, A. Reguera, Cones of curves and of line bundles at infinity. Journal of Algebra 293, 503-542 (2005). [5] C. Galindo, F. Monserrat, The cone of curves associated to a plane con­figuration, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 80 (2005), 75-93. [6] C. Galindo, F. Monserrat, The cone of curves of Line Bundles of a Ratio­nal Surface, International Journal of Mathematics. Vol. 15, No. 4 (2004), 393-407. [7] G. Failla, M. Lahyane, G. Molica Bisci, On the finite generation of the monoid of effective

Open access

Crisis Communication and the Norwegian Authorities

22 July and the Chernobyl Disaster: Two Catastrophes, Dissimilar Outcomes

Soilikki Vettenranta

Managing the Unforeseen, Nordicom Review 2: 31-40. NOU (2012) Rapport fra 22. juli-kommisjonen. (The 22 July Commission’s Report.) Oslo: Norges offentlige utredninger 2012:14. NOU (1998) Informasjonskriser. (Information Crises.) Oslo: Norges offentlige utredninger 1998:19. Plough, A. and Krimsky S. (1987) The Emergence of Risk Communication Studies: Social and Political Context, Science, Technology and Human Values 3-4: 4-10. Skjønsberg, E. (1995) Omsorgsrasjonalitet: fremtidens fornuft. (Rationality of

Open access

Rafael Andreu, Josep Riverola, Josep Mª Rosanas and Rafael de Santiago

isomorphisms and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147-160. Giancola, F. L. (2011), Examining the job itself as a source of employee motivation, Compensation & Benefits Review, 43 (1), pp. 23-29. Gilbert, N. (2008), Agent Based Models (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences), SAGE Publications. Gosavi, A. (2010), Simulation-Based Optimization: Parametric Optimization Techniques and Reinforcement Learning, Kluwer Academic Publications. Gottschalg, O