Fagerberg, J. (1996, September). Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy , 12 (3), 39-51. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/12.3.39
Ferraro, S., Dutt, P. K., & Kerikmäe, T. (2017). Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technologicalcompetitiveness of small European Union member states. Croatian International Relations Review , 23 (78), 97-126.
Grossman, G. E., & Helpman, E. (1989). Comparative advantage and long-run growth . (NBER Working Papers 2809
Simona Ferraro, Pawan Kumar Dutt and Tanel Kerikmäe
The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative will open new trade routes between China and the European Union (EU) and increase competition pressures on smaller EU member states. This article ranks where states like Estonia stand internationally in terms of innovativeness (and consequent competitiveness) by conducting an econometric study of patent development, education policy and research and development (R&D) expenditure policy. The authors claim that small member states such as Estonia should follow the example of countries such as Germany and adopt policies which focus more on increased public spending on R&D and innovation in public universities of science and technology, and raise support for high tech startups with a strong focus on international patenting. Member States must go further and subsidise R&D activities by focusing, inter alia, on filing of foreign patents such as triadic patents.
Pawan Dutt, Simona Ferraro, Archil Chochia and Ramona Muljar
://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/National_accounts_and_GDP [accessed 20 Apr 2018]
Ferraro, S.; Dutt, K. P.; Kerikmäe, T. (2017), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technologicalcompetitiveness of small European Union Member States,’ Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 23, no. 78, pp. 97−126. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0009
Finnish Government (2017a), IT-palveluiden vienti on jo Suomen “uusi Nokia”. Retrieved from http://valtioneuvosto.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/10616/itpalveluiden
Subject and purpose of work: The subject of this study is transfer prices and their use for optimization of financial burdens of international companies (capital groups). The purpose of this study was to present transfer pricing issues in the light of applicable law and using them for tax purposes.
Materials and methods: The study uses literature and data from the World Bank and Google. Methods of descriptive and tabular analysis and inference were used.
Results: Google makes 91% of its revenues outside the US.
Conclusions: Transfer pricing is a tool for optimizing tax burden of international companies that bring them benefits in the form of the so-called “globalization annuity”, which makes them economically stronger and more technologically competitive. Polish tax law on transfer pricing has been tightened since 2001; transfer pricing issues are also regulated by the European Union and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Vakhtang Charaia, Archil Chochia and Mariam Lashkhi
. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/China-EU_-_international_trade_in_goods_statistics [accessed Nov 2018]
Ferraro, S.; Dutt, K. P. & Kerikmäe, T. (2017), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technologicalcompetitiveness of small European Union Member States,’ Croatian International Relations Review , vol. 23, no. 78, pp. 97−126. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0009
Hanemann, T. & Huotari, M. (2017), Record Flows and Growing Imbalances: Chinese
., Guldmann, J. M. (2007). Spatial interaction modeling of interregional commodity flows. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 41(2), 147-162.
Narula, R.,Wakelin, K. (1998). TechnologicalCompetitiveness, Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9, 373-387.
Noorbakhsh, F., Paloni, A. (2001). Human Capital and FDI Inflows to Developing Countries: New Empirical Evidence. World Development, 29(9), 1593-1610.
Notaro, G. (2002). European Integration and Productivity: Exploring the Gains of the
internationalization process of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews , 16 (1), 2-23.
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies , 42 , 740-762.
Weresa, M. A. (2019). Technologicalcompetitiveness of the EU member states in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Economics and Business Review , 3 (19), 50-71.
Yamamura, S., & Lassalle, P. (2019). Proximities and the
Zuzana Sarvašová, Klára Báliková, Zuzana Dobšinská, Martina Štěrbová and Jaroslav Šálka
., Rowcroft, P., Everard, M., Couldrick, L., Reed, M., Rogers, H., Quick, T., Eves, Ch. & White C. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: a best practice guide . London: Defra.
Stanton, T., Echavarria, M., Hamilton, K. & Ott C. (2010). State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace . State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/state-of-watershed-payments/
Sternberg, E. (1996). Recuperating from market failure: planning for biodiversity and technologicalcompetitiveness. Public Administration Review
://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/National_accounts_and_GDP#Developments_in_GDP_in_the_EU:_growth_since_2013 Accessed: 14.06.2019
EVAS, Tatjana, HOFFMANN, Thomas, JOAMETS, Kristi, KERIKMAE, Tanel, LOIK, Ramon, NYMAN-METCALF, Katrin, POPOV, Aleksandr, SARAV, Sandra. General Frameworks. In KERIKMAE, Tanel, JOAMETS, Kristi, RODINA, Anita, PLEPS, Janis, GRUODYTE, Edita (eds). The Law of the Baltic States, Springer Verlag, 2018, pp. 41−100.
FERRARO, Simona, DUTT, Pawan, KERIKMAE, Tanel. Using Patent Development, Education Policy and Research and Development Expenditure Policy to Increase TechnologicalCompetitiveness of Small European Union Member States
Chaudhuri, S. and Ray, S. (1997). The competitiveness conundrum: literature review and reflections. Economic and Political Weekly, M83-M91.
Chesnais, F. (1986). Science, technology and competitiveness. STI Review, 1.
Chesnais, F. (1991). TechnologicalCompetitiveness Considered as a Form of Structural Competitiveness. In: Technology and National Competitiveness. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Cho, D.-S. (1998). From National Competitiveness to Bloc and Global