Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 items :

  • "stewardship theory" x
Clear All

philosophical foundations of corporate governance. London: Routledge. Cuevas-Rodriguez, G., Gomez-Mejia, L. R. & Wiseman, R. M. (2012). Has agency theory run its course?: Making the theory more flexible to inform the management of reward systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 526-546.doi:10.1111/corg.12004 Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47. doi:10.2307/259223 de Haan, J. & Vlahu, R. (2016). Corporate governance of banks: A survey. Journal of

Summary

The main issues in efficiency of a company as an organisation are relations between the Supervisory Board and the Management Board of a company, and the methods of functioning of Supervisory Boards in governance systems of a company.

The classical and modern approach to the role, place, and importance of corporate governance presented in this article, is yet another prompt to continue searching for the optimum in the organisational, economical, and social meaning.

performance. Journal of Business Ethics , 135 (3), 569-585. Shi, W., Connelly, B. L., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). External corporate governance and financial fraud: Cognitive evaluation theory insights on agency theory prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal , 38 (6), 1268-1286. SIB. (2016). Resolución JM-62-2016. Reglamento de Gobierno Corporativo. Guatemala. Retrieved from https://www.sib.gob.gt/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=3632929andname=DLFE-26423.pdf Subramanian, S. (2018). Stewardship theory of corporate governance and value system: The case of a

Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Corporate Stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (4): 34-42. Clark, T. 1998. The Stakeholder Corporation: A Business Philosophy for the Information Age. Long Range Planning 31 (2): 182-194. Daft, R. and Marcic, D. 2001. Understanding Management. London: Thomson Learning. Davis, H. J., Schoorman, F. D. and Donaldson L. 1997. Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 20-47. Donaldson, L. and Davis J. H. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder

corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , vol. 15, no. 1, 1-13. Donaldson, L., and Davis, J.H. (1991), Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns, Australian Journal of Management , vol. 16 no. 1 49-64. Donaldson, T., and Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 65-91. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to

on firms’ financial performance. ASEAN Economic Bulletin , 21 (3), 1-29. Denis, D. J., & Sarin, A. (1999). Ownership and board structures in publicly traded corporations. Journal of Financial Economics , 52 (2), 187-223. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management , 16 (1), 49-64. Ducassy, I., & Guyot, A. (2017). Complex ownership structures, corporate governance and firm performance: The French context. Research in International Business and Finance , 39

.08.2013). Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120. Bohdanowicz, L. (2009). Profesjonalizm w funkcjonowaniu rad nadzorczych spółek akcyjnych. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. and Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20-47, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9707180258 Dolgopyatova, T. (2001). Modeli i mekhanizmy korporativnogo kontrolya v rossiyskoy promyshlennosti. Voprosy ekonomiki, 5: 46-60. Dolgopyatova, T

://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf. Cranfield School of Management. (2009). Sustainable Value EABIS Research Project: Corporate Responsibility, Market Valuation and Measuring the Financial and Non-Financial Performance of theFirm.Retrieved June 17, 2014, from http://investorvalue.org/docs/Eabis-ProjectFinal.pdf. Demb, A., Neubauer, F. F. (1992). The Corporate Board: Confronting the Paradoxes. New York: Oxford University Press. Donaldson, L., Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64. DVFA. (2007). Key

Loans. Journal of Financial Economics, 112 (2), 190-212. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R., Cannella, A.A.Jr. (2003). Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data. Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), 371-382. Donaldson, L., Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16 (1), 49-64. Garcia-Appendini, E., Montoriol-Garriga, J. (2013). Firms as Liquidity Providers: Evidence from the 2007–2008 Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (1), 272-291. Gopalan, R., Nanda, V

agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 4 (28), 355–362. Dunn, B. (1995). Success themes in Scottish family enterprises: philosophies and practices through the generations. Family Business Review , 9 , 17–28. Dyer, W.G. Jr. (2006). Examining the ‘family effect’ on firm performance. Family Business Review , 19 , 253–273. Eddleston, K.A., Kellermanns, F.W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: a stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing