Gianluca Grilli, Giulia Garegnani, Aleš Poljanec, Andrej Ficko, Daniele Vettorato, Isabella De Meo and Alessandro Paletto
organizations. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
Freeman L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks , 1, 215–239.
Granovetter M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology , 6, 1360–1380.
Gregory R., Wellman R. 2001. Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study. Ecological Economics , 39 (1), 37–52.
Grimble R., Chan M.K. 1995. Stakeholderanalysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Natural Resources Forum , 19
, contexts, experiences and opportunities.Agricultural Systems 55(2): 173-193.
GRIMBLE, R. - CHAN, M.K. (1995): Stakeholderanalysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Natural Resources Forum 19(2): 113-124.
HARSHAW, H.W. - TINDALL D.B. (2005): Social structure, identities, and values: a network approach to understanding people’s relationships to forests. Journal of Leisure Research 37(4): 426-449.
HOBBES, T. (1651): Leviathan. Green Dragon, St. Paul's Churchyard.
KANGAS, A. - LAUKKANEN
Giannis Adamos, Eftihia Nathanail, Irina Yatskiv Jackiva, Evelina Budilovich Budiloviča and Maria Tsami
The present paper aims at measuring the satisfaction of travellers and stakeholders on perceived quality of service provided at the Latvian interchange “Riga International Coach Terminal” and understand whether there are any gaps between the two groups of involved parties, based on their perceptions and expectations. To this end, a travellers’ attitudinal survey was organized and interviews with representative stakeholders were conducted, in order to capture and analyse their attitudes and preferences and extract those attributes that affect their satisfaction. Results showed that the interchange performs well in physical quality attributes, such as travel and wayfinding information provision, but in terms of access and aesthetics expectations in the internal and external design, some contradictory findings were revealed between travellers and stakeholders, validating the fact that understanding users’ perceptions can work as vital input to policy makers’ perceptions of an integrated sustainable public transport system.
Problem Solving for closer cooperation between academic entities and enterprises. The following chapter presents a SWOT matrix to elaborate on the results of the analysis into the strengths and weaknesses arising from the application of the BIZ-TRIZ mechanism. The analysis was based on the results of the survey and the literature review. The results of the SWOT analysis showed significant benefits from the application of the BIZ-TRIZ mechanism. This required a needs analysis of the individual stakeholders implementing the BIZ-TRIZ mechanism. The stakeholderanalysis is
Pasti, Vladimir. 2006. Noul capitalism românesc. Iași: Polirom.
Poenaru, Florin. 2014. '‹More of the same›: Elections without choice in Romania.' Critic Atac, 27.10.2014.
Pop-Elecheș, Grigore. 2009. From Economic Crisis to Reform. IMF Programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Prell, Christina, Klaus Hubacek, and Mark Reed. 2009. 'StakeholderAnalysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management.' Society and Natural Resources 22: 501-518.
Krzysztof Kaganek, Tadeusz Ambroży, Dariusz Mucha, Adam Jurczak, Agata Bornikowska, Andrzej Ostrowski, Renata Janiszewska and Teresa Mucha
. Transportation Journal 31(3), 46-53.
8. Przecławski K. (1995). Tourism and its role vs. people with special needs. In J. Ślężyński, W. Petryński (eds.), Progress in tourism for the benefit of people with special needs (p. 34). Kraków: Polish Association of Disabled People. [in Polish]
9. Buhalis D., Eichhron V., Michopoulou E., Miller G. (2005). Accessibility market and stakeholderanalysis. United Kingdom: One-Stop-Shop for Accessible Tourism in Europe (OSSATE), University of Surrey. 10. Jones S. (2004). Disabled faced by travel “barriers
Haniyeh Moradpanah, Mohammad Dehdar Dargahi, Soleiman Mohammadi Limaei and Monireh Moradpanah
Billgren Ch., Holmen H. 2008. Approaching reality: Comparing stakeholderanalysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management. Land Use Policy , 25: 550–562.
Campbell S.J., Kartawijaya T., Yuliantoa I., Prasetiaa R., Clifton J. 2013. Co-management approaches and incentives improve management effectiveness in the Karimunjawa National Park, Indonesia. Marine Pol icy, 41: 72–79.
Emerton L. 1996. Participatory Environmental Valuation: Subsistence Forest use around the Aberdares, Kenya. Applied economics
., QUINN C. H., STRINGER L. C. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholderanalysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90: 1933-1949.
ROGOWSKA M. 2010. Endogeniczne determinanty rozwoju lokalnego. In: Znaczenie samorządu terytorialnego dla rozwoju regionalnego w Polsce Niemczech i na Ukrainie. Red. E. Malinowska-Klimiuk. Zeszyty Naukowe NR 620, Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług Nr 61, Wyd. Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin: 353-362.
RYMARZAK M. 2009. Zarządzanie nieruchomościami
Marta Lackowska, Barbara Nowicka, Marta Bałandin and Mirosław Grochowski
, no. 2-3, pp. 120–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004.
Rannow, S, Loïbl, W, Grieving, S, Gruehn, D & Meyer, BC 2010, ’Potential impacts of climate change in Germany – Identifying regional priorities for adaptation activities in spatial planning’, Landscape Urban Planning , no. 98, pp. 160–171.
Reed, M, Graves, A, Dandy, N, Posthumus, H, Hubacek, K, Morris, J, Prell, C, Quinn, C & Stringer, L 2009, ‘Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholderanalysis methods for Natural Resource Management’, Journal of Environmental Management, no. 90, pp