Mureșan Daniel, Andreea Cătană, Radu Anghel Popp, Diana Elena Dumitraș, Florin Stamatian, Anca Dana Buzoianu and Ioana Cristina Rotar
GSTT1 contribute to risk of cervical neoplasia: an evidence-based meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20157. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020157.
34. McIntyre-Seltman K, Castle PE, Guido R, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM. Smoking is a risk factor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 among oncogenic human papillomavirus DNA-positive women with equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1165-70. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0918.
35. Sheehan D, Meade G, Foley VM, Dowd CA. Structure, function and evolution of
Ana Devic, Mladenko Vasiljevic and Aleksandar Devic
EIN – Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia
RI - Resistance Index
1. Baak JP, Mutter GL, Robboy S, van Diest PJ, Uyterlinde AM, Orbo A, et al. The molecular genetics and morphometry-based endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification system predicts disease progression in endometrial hyperplasia more accurately than the 1994 World Health Organization classification system. Cancer, 2005;103:2304-12.
2. Parra-Herran CE, Monte NM, Mutter GL. Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia with secretory differentiation
Cats and dogs are routinely diagnosed with different forms of neoplasia. One of the simplest imaging techniques is radiography. This way one can assess neoplastic extent affecting soft and bone tissue. 493 radiographs from 235 dogs and cats have been reviewed. 372 radiographs for 94 dogs, an average of 5.2 images for every dog and 121 radiographs for 48 cats, an average of 2.5 images for each cat were done. 27 relevant or suspect radiographs were done in dogs, for a total of 14 neoplastic subjects, corresponding to 6 relevant or suspect images for a total of 3 neoplastic processes in cats. This is translated into a proportion of 7.25% relevant or suspect radiographs in dogs and 4.95% in cats. It also means that 14.89% of the dogs that require radiographic examination and 2.47% of the cats are suffering or are suspicious for neoplastic disease. 5 out of 14 (35%) dogs had relevant radiographs for bone tissue neoplasia, 1 dog (7%) for muscular neoplasia and 4 dogs (28.5%) were suspicious for digital (mixed soft tissue/ bone tissue) neoplasia. 1 out of 3 cats had relevant images for muscular neoplasia and 2 cats for maxillary/ acetabular neoplasia.
Diana Voicu, Alexandru Baroș, Oana Bodean, Florina-Paula Păuleț, Cătălin Cîrstoiu, Bogdan Şerban and Monica Mihaela Cîrstoiu
The article represents an analysis of a confirmed case of digestive neoplasia noted during the last trimester of pregnancy, in which we tried to assess osseous metastases, in correlation with their clinical development and histopathological features. The International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that during the year of 2018, in Romania, a total of 11.076 new cases of colorectal cancer were documented, ranking this type of neoplasia as the 2nd among the most common types of cancer in our country.
Oktay Algin, Evrim Ozmen, Pamir Ersoy and Mustafa Karaoglanoglu
Liver Dis 2007; 16 : 105-8.
Feldmann G, Beaty R, Hruban RH, Maitra A. Molecular genetics of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14 : 224-32.
Botros M, Quevedo JF, Miller RC. Angiosarcoma of the liver after multimodality therapy for gallbladder carcinoma. Radiol Oncol 2009; 43 : 126-31.
Debevec L, Jeric T, Kovac V, Bitenc M; Sok M. Is there any progress in routine management of lung cancer patients? A comparative analysis of an institution in 1996
Slobodan Stojanović, Nada Vučković and Dragan Vemić
1. Aynaud O, Ionesco M, Barrasso R. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia: specific clinical features correlate with histologic and virologic findings. Cancer 1994;74(6):1762-7.
2. Cubilla A, Dilliner J, Schellhammer PF, Horenblas S, Ayala AG, Reuter VA, et al. Malignant epithelial tumors. In: Eble NJ, Sauter G, Epstein IJ, Sesterhenn IA. World Health organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumors of the urinary system and male genital tumors. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004. p. 281
Helena Gutnik, Jasenka P. Matisic, Maja Primic Zakelj and Margareta Strojan Flezar
. p. 326-31.
7. Crum CP, Rose PG. Cervical squamous neoplasia. In: Crum CP, Lee KR, editors. Diagnostic and obstetric pathology. 1st edition Elsevier Inc.; 2006. p. 320-34.
8. Boyle DP, McCluggage WG. Pseudoinvasion of benign squamous epithelium following cervical biopsy: a pseudoneoplastic phenomenon mimicking invasive squamous carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2011; 64: 1093-6.
9. Nafussi A, Hughes DE. Histological features of CIN 3 and their value in predicting invasive microinvasive squamous carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 1994
Monira M. Gad, Salma B. Galal, Wafaa Helmy and Naela H Abd El-Fattah
. Trop Med Int Health 2011; 16(3): 379-89.
8. Adanu RMK, Seffah JD, Duda R, et al. Clinic visits and cervical cancer screening in Accra. Ghana Med J 2010; 44(2): 59-63.
9. Khan M, Sultana SS, Jaben N, et al. Visual inspection of cervix with acetic acid: a good alternative to Pap smear for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited setting. J Pak Med Assoc 2015; 65(2): 192-5.
10. Sankaranarayanan R, Basu P, Wesley RS, et al. Accuracy of visual screening for cervical neoplasia: results from an IARC multicentre study in India and Africa. Int J Cancer