Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 items :

  • "map evaluation" x
Clear All


The author presents criteria of evaluation and assumption for early school education maps. Attention was payed to needs and perceptual possibilities of map users and cartographic correctness of maps. Main criteria of map evaluation – content and form of a map – have their unique attributes. In case of the first criterion they are accuracy and currency, classification of content and usability. Second criterion consist of: composition, colours, labels on the map and readability. Materials commissioned by Ministry of National Education were evaluated on the said criteria basis. Evaluation of maps for early school education revealed their flaws, among which absence of a scale can be named. Afterwards assumptions were developed and used to prepare own proposal of a map. Achieving maximum readability was a priority. Other assumptions concerned graphic balance, classification and hierarchy of content, simplicity of elaboration, usage of readable typefaces and adjustment of transmission to the age of users.


The array of archival maps from the 19th and 20th centuries is very large and, in order to assess their reliability for a particular analysis, some kind of evaluation form must be used. The proposed evaluation form comprises both formal and quantitative criteria, enriched with the maps’ elaboration circumstances, which may influence their reliability. These factors are also applied at both the spatial and attribute levels of information. Guidelines include: the scope of content, the map’s mathematical precision, the descriptive information correctness, the time reference of the content, and the information transfer efficiency.

in Poland, L'entrepreneur face aux politiques publiques europeennes , ed. C. Martin, T. Rkibi, PGV/ISLA, Lisboa. Thomas A.S., Mueller S.L. (2000), A case for comparative entrepreneurship:Assessing the relevance of culture , “Journal of International Business Studies”, 31(2), pp. 287–301. Thomas A.S., Shenkar O., Clarke L.D. (1994), The globalization of our mental maps: Evaluating the geographic scope of JIBS coverage , “Journal of International Business Studies”, 25(4): 675–686. Timmons J. (1990), New Venture Creation, IRVIN, Boston, p. 5. www

References Affek A., 2011. Landscape continuity versus landscape transformation: a case study in the Wiar River catchment, Polish Carpathians (1780-2000). The Problems of Landscape Ecology 30: 147-155. Affek A., 2013. Georeferencing of historical maps using GIS: As exemplified by the Austrian military surveys of Galicia. Geographia Polonica 86(4): 375-390. Bennett B., 2001. What is a forest? On the vagueness of certain geographic concepts. Topoi 20: 189-201. Bjørke J.T., 1996. Framework for entropy-based map evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information

of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 , 4, 507–516. Pašteka R., Karcol R., Kušnirák D., Mojzeš A., 2012: REGCONT: A Matlab based program for stable downward continuation of geophysical potential fields using Tikhonov regularization. Computers and Geosciences, 49 , 278–289. Pašteka R., Milo P., Kušnirák D., Wunderlich T., Wilken D., Putiška R., Urminský J., Papčo J., Murín I., 2015: Role of regularized derivatives in magnetic edge mappers evaluation. Archaeologia Polona, 53 , Archaeological

roapoznanie i interpretacja tresci mapy" [Automatic Recognition and Interprétation of the Map Contents], Prze- glqd Geodezyjny, vol. XLV, No. 11—12, pp. 496—500. G r y g o r e n k o W., 1975a. "Odwzorowanie Sluzfoy Topograficznej WP w Atlasie Swiata" [Projection of the Polish Army Topographic Service for Global Maps], Polski Przeglqd Kartograficzny, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 65—71. G r y g o r e n k o W., 1975b. "Pròba oceny wartosci uzytkoyej map" [Evaluation of a Utilitarian Value of Map], Przeglqd Geodezyjny, vol. 47, No. 9, pp. 379— —382. G r y g o r e n k o W., 1976a

ANDRZEJ RICHLING, WOJCIECH LEWANDOWSKI Fig. 6. A fragment of a map evaluating land use scaled 100,000 — neighbourhood of ¿uromin 1. optimum 2. correct 3. incorrect 4. anthropogenic terrains THE MAP OF LANDSCAPE USE 27 mixed use due to a higher, intensity and variability' of natural processes occurring within them and also due to the fact that within such areas there are possibilities to change the use. Uniform forest complexes and large agricultural areas should not change their use although their borders of composition in forests may be corrected. Also much