Search Results

1 - 10 of 87 items :

  • "intonation" x
Clear All

. (1990). How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development , 61 (6) , 1824–1841. Cutler, A. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In M. Galy, R. Fox, & A. Bruck (Eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 117–127). Chicago, Ill.: CLS. Dews, S. & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: a social function of irony. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity , 10 (1), 3–19. Filippova, E. (2014). Developing of appreciation of irony in Canadian and Czech discourse. Journal of Pragmatics

Abbreviations ap = accentual phrase, dur = durative, ez = the ezafe particle, ip = intonational phrase, prs = present, pst = past, ptcp = participle, sg = singular, sm = specificity marker; the equal sign (=) in the examples marks an enclitic boundary; the plus sign (+) separates the two parts of a compound verb References Abolhasanizadeh, V., Gussenhoven, C., and Bijankhan, M. (2010). The position of clitics in Persian intonational structure. Speech Prosody 2010, 100108, 1-4. Retrieved from

References Anderson, Stephen R. 1971. On the linguistic status of the performative/constative distinction . Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Avis, Walter. S. 1972. So eh? is Canadian, eh. Canadian journal of linguistics 17(2). 89–104. Bach, Kent & Robert Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts . Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Bartels Christine. 1999. The intonation of English statements and questions . New York: Garland Publishing. Beyssade, Claire & Jean-Marie Marandin. 2006. The speech act assignment problem revisited

References Bailly, Gerard & Holm, Bleike, 2005. SFC: A trainable prosodic model. Speech Communications, 45, 364-384. Campione, Estelle; Hirst, Daniel & Véronis, Jean. Automatic stylisation and symbolic coding of F0: implementations of the INTSINT model. Intonation. Research and Applications, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. Cruttenden, Alan 1981. Falls and rises: meanings and universals. Journal of Linguistics 17, 77-91. Cruttenden, Alan 1997. Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crystal, David 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English

, NJ: Erlbaum. Baron-Cohen, S. & Swettenham, J. (1996). The relationship between SAM and TOMM: Two hypotheses. In P. K. Smith & P. Carruthers (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, J. R. & Dunn, J. (1991). ‘You can cry, mum’: The social and developmental implications of talk about internal states. British Journal of Developmental Psychology , 9, 237-256. Capelli, C., Nakagawa, N., & Madden, C. (1990). How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development , 61, 1824-1841. Case, R. (1992

References Baker, Rachel Elizabeth. 2010. The acquisition of English focus marking by non-native speakers. (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University. Baumann, Stefan–Martine Grice. 2006. The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1636–1657. Boersma, Paul–David Weenink. 2016. PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer. Celce-Murcia, Marianne. 2007. Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In: E. Alcón Soler, M. P. Safont Jordà (eds), Intercultural language use and language learning , 41

brief television news items: Effects of presentation mode, picture content and serial position. Journal of Educational Television , 5, 57-61. Gunter, B. (1980). Remembering television news: Effects of picture content. Journal of Psychology , 102, 127-133. Gunter, B. (1987). Poor reception: Misunderstanding and forgetting broadcast news. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Iyengar S. & Kinder D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Jun, S.-A. (2003). Intonation. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Vol

.). 2004. IULC Working Papers Online 4-04. [], 1-44. José, Brian & Auger, Julie. 2005. Geminates and Picard pronominal clitic allomorphy. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4. 127-154. Jun, Sun-Ah. 1998. The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 15. 189-226. Jun, Sun-Ah & Fougeron, Cécile. 2000. A Phonological Model of French Intonation. In Botinis, Antonis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modeling, and Technology, 209-242. Amsterdam: Kluwer. Jun, Sun-Ah & Fougeron, Cécile. 2002. Realizations of accentual phrase in


The paper tests the hypothesis that prosodic highlighting of individual words with emotional connotation can affect the recipient’s perception of the expressiveness of the entire utterance. Seventeen respondents listened to two speech realizations of the same text and marked its emotional level on the scale between positive and negative. To achieve emotional neutrality of the utterances, they were synthesized with Kempelen 3.0 speech system. The results show a tendency of respondents to perceive speech with prosodically highlighted negative words as more negative (sad) than speech with positive words highlighted, which was marked as more positive (joyful).

, 1994, roč. 5, s. 37 - 41. Shriberg, Elizabeth: To “Errrr” is Human: Ecology and Acoustics of Speech Disfluencies. In: Journal of International Phonetic Association, 2001, roč. 31, č. 1, s. 153 - 169. Shriberg, Elizabeth - Lickley, Robin: Intonation of clause-internal filled pauses. In: Phonetica, 1993, roč. 50, s. 172 - 179. Shiwa, Toshiyuki - Kanda, Takayuki - Imai, Michita - Ishiguro, Hiroshi - Hagita, Norihiro: How quickly should communication robots respond? In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM /IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, 2008, s. 153