od 1 styczna 2007 r. do 31 grudnia. 2016 r. Biuro Urządzania Lasu i Geodezji Leśnej Oddział w Brzegu, Brzeg 2007.
Rutkowski P. 2009. Natura 2000 w leśnictwie [Nature 2000 and Forestry]. Warszawa, Ministerstwo Środowiska, 69 p. ISBN 978-83-89994-03-5.
Rutkowski P. 2012. Stan i perspektywy rozwoju typologii leśnej w Polsce. Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu [State and perspectives of foresttypology in Poland]. Rozprawy Naukowe, 436: 3-248.
Sewerniak P. 2011. Zróżnicowanie wybranych właściwości gleb drzewostanów
Václav Kupčák, Karel Pulkrab, Roman Sloup and Anna Beníčková
In forest management, natural conditions have long been systemized by groups of forest habitat types (GFHT). Based on them, appropriate economic measures can be taken and economic efficiency of silviculture calculated. Management intensity, the term related only to timber production in the past, has recently been defined more broadly within the sustainable, close-to-nature forest management concept. It includes economic-ecological and efficient management, and reflects potential production as well as ecological effects of forest stands. Nature and natural development are preferred where artificial interventions are unnecessary (Plíva 2000). This concept uses a specific GFHT as the elementary unit as it allows to exactly identify ecological and economic potential, management measures, quantification and monetary expression of elementary components of economic efficiency. Such optimization of management measures and their economic projections analysis can be considered a comprehensive biological-ecological-economic analysis.
Avis, P.G. 1997. The foresttypology of Latvia: an overview and comparison. – Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, Section B, 51, 195–199.
Bušs, K. 1997. Forest ecosystems classification in Latvia. – Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Science, Section B, 51, 204–218.
Bušs, K.K. 1976. Principles of ForestTypology in Latvian SSR. Review. (Основы лесной типологи Латвийской ССР. Обзор.). Рига, ЛатИНТИ. 25 pp. (In Russian).
Chytrý M., Tichý L., Dřevojan P., Sádlo J., Zelený D. 2018. Ellenberg-type indicator values for
Jarosław Lasota, Ewa Błońska, Tomasz Wanic and Maciej Zwydak
The subject of this study were soil requirements of common woody shrubs, which may be part of the forest understory (Sorbus aucuparia L., Frangula alnus Mill., Corylus avellana L., Juniperus communis L., Padus avium Mill., Euonymus europaea L., Sambucus nigra L.). We focused on phytocenoses in the vicinity of natural forests in reserves and national parks of Polish lowlands and defined optimal types and subtypes of soil with trophic variations for each underwood species. The range of trophism for each species of shrub was determined using specific physicochemical properties of the soils, while soil quality was assessed using the Trophic Soil Index (SIG) (Brożek et al. 2011a). The ecological requirements of the before-mentioned underwood species were linked with forest typology as well as natural vegetation and they showed different soil requirements. Here we report significant differences in particle size and dynamics of organic matter decomposition in soils associated with these underwood species.
The paper proposes and justifies an alternative concept of aggregation of forest site types in higher units for purposes of differentiation of forest management. Analysis of variance was performed for both: the natural occurrence of tree species in reserves, as well as the production potential of tree species measured on the representative plots according to Zlatnik´s altitudinal vegetation zones and edaphictrophic series. Based on the results of this analysis, an aggregation of forest site types was suggested along the elevation gradient of climatop, and along the edaphic-trophic and the edaphic-hydric gradients of edaphotop. By intersection of such created 32 categories of geotope with the basic formation groups of forest habitats by Braun-Blanquet geo-botanical school, 53 reconstructive geo-biotopes were formed. The proposed unit was compared using the F-test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and the index of classification efficiency (EQ) with current typological units in terms of its ability to describe the variability of the analyzed parameters. Finally, the qualitative association of the compared classification models with the European classification systems was assessed. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the site unit geo-biotop is at least comparable with currently used unit MGFT, with the number of categories lower by 72%.
use potential of regional of Slovakia (in Slovak). Bratislava: VUPOP. European landscape convention (2000). Florencia.
Hančinský, L. (1977). Foresttypology in operating practice (in Slovak). Bratislava: Príroda.
Hrnčiarová, T. et al. (1997). The ecological carrying capacity: Methodology and its application on 3 target areas (in Slovak). Part I-IV. Bratislava: MŽP SR, ÚKE SAV.
Miština, T. (2006). Externalities in plant production (in Slovak). In G. Blaas (Ed.), Multifunkčnépostavenie a trvalo udržateľný rast poľnohospodárstva a lesníctva (pp. 56
of woody plants. Moscow: publ. AN SSSR, p. 1-375.
Stepanova, N., Mykhin, V., 1979: Basis of ecology of wood-destroying fungi. Moscow: Nauka, 100 p.
Vorobyov, D., 1967: Metodology for foresttypology research. Kyiv: Urojay, 388 p.
Zmitrovich, I., 2001: Macrosystem and phylogeny of Basidiomycetes: the case for a red algal progenitor. Mycena 1:3-58.
Zmitrovich, I., Wasser, S., 2004: Modern view on the origin and phylogenetics reconstruction of Homobasidiomycetes fungi. Evolutionary theory and processes
.P. (1998). The basic principles of a genetic approach to developing forest type maps. Ecology 4: 256-261.
Sochava, V.B. (1977). Landscapes of Southeastern Siberia (1:1 500000 map). Moscow.
SRTM-3-DEM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Digital Elevation Model). Available from http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/russia.htm
Sukachev, V.N. (1972). Selected Works. Fundamentals of ForestTypology and Biogeocenology , Vol. 1. Nauka Publications, Leningrad.
Sysuev, V.V. (2006