Search Results

1 - 10 of 576 items :

  • "forest management" x
Clear All

. dokt. Maszyn. Kat. Urządzania Lasu, 2013, Poznań. 25. Miotke M, Jaszczak R.: Predictions regarding the impact of the forest management plan on environment and Natura 2000 regions in Poland in the context of sustainable development. Journal of Management and Sustainable Development 2 (29) (2011), 127-130. 26. Poznański R.: Nowe metody regulacji w urządzaniu lasu. Kat. Urządzania Lasu AR w Krakowie, 2004, Kraków, ss. 195. 27. Przypaśniak J.: Ocena realizacji prognoz oddziaływania planu urządzenia lasu na środowisko. W: Arkuszewska A., Lotz D., Szujecka G. [red

. Nauka-Przyroda-Technologie, t.5, z.3, art. 21 (2011a). 12. Jaszczak R., Rączka G., Magnuski K., Miotke M., Piątkowski S.: Problemy przebudowy lasów w Polsce w regionach przemysłowych. Nauka-Przyroda- Technologie, t.5, z.3, art. 22 (2011b). 13. Jaszczak R., Magnuski K: Urządzanie lasu. Wyd. UP Pozn., 2012, Poznań, ss. 492. 14. Jaszczak R., Wajchman S.: Problems of forest management in municipal forests of the city of Poznań. Civil And Environmental Engineering Reports 12 (1) (2014), 45-54. 15. Jaszczak R., Wajchman S.: Wybrane aspekty gospodarki leśnej w lasach

References Bartelmus P. 2003. Dematerialization and capital maintenance: two sides of the sustainability coin. Ecological Economics, 46, 61-81. Baycheva T., Inhaizer H., Lier M., Prins K., Wolfslehner B. 2013. Implementing criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management in Europe, report. available at: http://www.ci-sfm.org/report.html. Accessed: 10.01.2014. Bernadzki E. 2006. Forest and forestry in European Union countries. Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych, Warsaw. Blichtarska M., Angelstam P., Elbakidze M., Axelsson R., Skorupski M., Węgiel A

REFERENCES B abics , I. (2014): Cserebogár pajor károsítása ellen alkalmazható csöves ültetési technológia eredményei 2003–2013.[Tube based planting technology applicable against cockchafer grub damage] In: Schiberna, E. (ed.): Klímaváltozással összefüggő erdőgazdálkodási kihívások. [Challenges in the forest management related to climate change.] Válogatott tanulmányok. Fenntartható Erdőgazdálkodásért Alapítvány, Sopron, 69–81. (in Hungarian) B oncica , A. (2011): Conceptual approaches to integrate nature conservation into forest management: a Central European

R eferences Altrell, D. & Erdenebat, E. (2016). Mongolian Multipurpose National Forest Inventory 2014 – 2016 . 1 st edition. Ulaanbaatar, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, p. 171. Čermák, P., Mikita, T., Trnka, M., Štěpánek, P., Jurečka, F., Kusbach, A. and Šebesta, J. (2018). Changes of Climate Characteristics of Forest Altitudinal Zones within the Czech Republic and their Possible Consequences for Forest Species Composition. Baltic Forestry 24(2), pp. 234-248. Černý, M. (2004). Methodology of Forest Management Plan Elaboration Based on an Operational

References Anderson P.G. 1996. Sediment generation from forestry operations and associated effects on aquatic ecosystems. Proceedings of the Forest–Fish Conference: Land Management Practices affecting Aquatic Ecosystems, May 1–4, 1996, Calgary, Alberta. DOI 10.1.1.518.5139. Anderson C.J., Lockaby B.G. 2011. Research gaps related to forest management and stream sediment in the United States. Environmental Management 47(1): 303–313. DOI 10.1007/s00267–010–9604–1. Aust W.M., Carroll M.B., Bolding M.C., Dolloff C.A. 2011. Operational forest stream crossings effects

, Y., McGrath, M.J., Ryder, J., Valade, A., Otto, J., Luyssaert, S. 2016. Forest management: Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming. – Science, 351(6273), 597–599. Noormets, A., Nouvellon, Y. 2015. Introduction for special issue: Carbon, water and nutrient cycling in managed forests. – Forest Ecology and Management, 355, 1–3. Ojanen, P., Minkkinen, K., Alm, J., Penttilä, T. 2010. Soil-atmosphere CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes in boreal forestry-drained peatlands. – Forest Ecology and Management, 260(3), 411–421. Olsson, R. 2011. To manage or

tatenhove, J., 2006: Political Modernization and Policy Arrangements: A Framework for Understanding Environmental Policy Change. Public Organization Review. 6:93–106. Beckley, T., Parkins, J., Sheppard, S., 2005: Public Participation in Sustainable Forest Management: A Reference Guide. Edmonton, Sustainable Forest Management Network, 60. Betuch, H., Polkau, M., Riemer, A., Schüll, E., Winkler, J., Zhirkova, I., 2015: Explorative Future Scenarios for Integrated Forest Management in Europe – An Overview of Scenario Storylines Developed in the Project INTEGRAL, Fraunhofer

as an indicator of health decline in the Beskids, Slovakia. Forest Ecology and Management, 325:108–117. Brodrechtová, Y., Navrátil, R., Sedmák, R., Tuček, J., 2018: Using the politicized IAD framework to assess integrated forest management decision making in Slovakia. Land Use Policy, 79:1001–1013. Carlsson, J., Eriksson, L. O., Öhman, K., Nordström, E. M., 2015: Combining scientific and stakeholder knowledge in future scenario development - a forest landscape case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 61:122–134. Dilek, C., 2009: The Scenario

rural–urban gradient. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28(2), 143–165. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2012.723740. [4] Angelstam, P., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Laestadius, L., Lazdinis, M., Nordberg, M., Pătru-Stupariu, I. & Smith, M. (2011). Knowledge production and learning for sustainable forest management on the ground: Pan-European landscapes as a time machine. Forestry 84(5), 581–596. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpr048. [5] Ambjörnsson Laszlo, E., Keskitalo, E. C. H., Karlsson, S. (2016). Forest discourses and the role of planning-related perspectives: the case