Power engineering is one of the key areas of sustainable development. Many countries create new concepts of environmental safety management and modify their energy systems to be in line with the goals of sustainable development in the EU. Sustainable development indicators can be a tool for monitoring the set goals of environmental safety management. The aim of the article is to assess the environmental safety management of the energy sector in Poland in relation to EU as well as presenting the concept of sustainable energy development and indicators used to assess the development of energy in the following dimensions: social, economic and ecological. The indicators used to assess the sustainable development of energy in the following dimensions were compared: sustainable consumption and production, marking the production and consumption of energy; organizations and sites with eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS); registration climate change, marking GHG emissions and the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption; sustainable transport, marking the energy consumption of transport relative to GDP. The article will test the hypothesis that the structure of obtaining energy in Poland and the tempo of change in this respect differ from the EU average.
Environmental safety management contributes to sustainable development. Sustainable development is a consequence of global ecological and social threats. The natural potential of the Earth is running out, which is confirmed by worsening indicators of Living Planet Index and Ecological Footprint. Acceleration of sustainable development is particularly important to production enterprises. Production enterprises use the majority of the world’s non-renewable resources and they are largely responsible for environmental pollution. The negative influence of the enterprises on the environment can be stopped by transforming them into sustainable enterprises. Sustainable top managers should play a key role in this process. Sustainable top managers constitute a new currently emerging category of leaders. They possess knowledge and experience in both management as well as sustainability. Their features include social and ecological sensitivity, innovation and the ability to convince and motivate employees within the scope of sustainable development as well. Their objective is to create an organization whose mission, strategy and operational action programmes include ecological and social initiatives. Due to this, sustainable development is becoming an important and permanent element of enterprise functioning. Sustainable leadership constitutes a key challenge for top managers which they should accept for the benefit of future generations. The support of environmental safety management by sustainable top managers promotes its implementation in enterprises thanks to their knowledge and ecological sensitivity as well as engaging in sustainable development.
This study focuses on the evaluation of the benefits and ecological costs that occur in the life cycle of a wind power plant. The study constitutes an attempt to expand upon previously conducted research on the analysis of costs and benefits in the stages of production, operation and post-consumer management of wind turbines. The aim of the study adopted research methodology, analysis and assessment of the benefits and environmental impacts of the Vestas V90/105m 2 MW wind turbine throughout its life cycle. Original assessment indicators of the benefits and ecological costs occurring throughout a wind power plant’s life cycle for environmental safety management, were proposed and verified.
. Skrodzka, W., Kiriliuk, O., 2019. Sustainability indicators and environmentalsafetymanagement as illustrated with an example of the Polish energy sector , CzOTO 2019, 1(1), 398-405. DOI: 10.2478/czoto-2019-0051 Tidd, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K., 2005. Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England. Wierzbicki, M., Nowodziński, P., 2019. Imitation and innovation in business environment Production Engineering Archives, 22, 36-40. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2019.22.07
., Bernard, S., Sloan, P., 2016. Environmental sciences, sustainable
development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary
research. Environ. Dev. 17, 48–56.
Schumpeter, J.A., 1994. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. VI ed. Routledge,
London and New York.
Skrodzka, W., Kiriliuk, O., 2019. Sustainability indicators and environmentalsafetymanagement as illustrated with an example of the Polish energy sector, CzOTO
2019, 1(1), 398-405. DOI: 10.2478/czoto-2019-0051
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K., 2005. Managing innovation: Integrating