In most of the finite element (FE) simulations, carried out for certain classes of soil–structure interaction problems, such as deepexcavations, a computational strategy that assumes nonlinear soil and linear structure (NSO–LST) behaviour is usually adopted. Such an approach should lead to the conservative assessment of stress resultants in the structure, and a safer design in consequence, but it is rather difficult to say whether this hypothesis holds true in all cases. The main source of this uncertainty is because most of the structural
1. A. Bolt, E. Dembicki, G. Horodecki, K. Jaworska, Analysis of measurement and calculations of displacements of slotted walls multilevelly anchored [in Polish], Materiały XI KKMGiF, Gdansk, 1997.
2. G. Horodecki, A. Bolt, E. Dembicki, Geotechnical problems in design and realization of cased excavations [in Polish], Inzynieria i Budownictwo, nr 12/2002.
3. A. Siemińska-Lewandowska, Designing of deepexcavations walls - theory and practice [in Polish], Geoinzynieria 02/2006.
Rafał F. Obrzud, Sébastien Hartmann and Krzysztof Podleś
This paper analyzes two approaches to serviceability limit state (SLS) verification for the deep excavation boundary value problem. The verification is carried out by means of the finite element (FE) method with the aid of the commercial program ZSoil v2014. In numerical simulations, deep excavation in non-cohesive soil is supported with a diaphragm wall. In the first approach, the diaphragm wall is modeled with the Hookean material assuming reduced average stiffness and possible concrete cracking. The second approach is divided into two stages. In the first stage, the wall is modeled by defining its stiffness with the highest nominal Young’s modulus. The modulus makes it possible to find design bending moments which are used to compute the minimal design cross-section reinforcement for the retaining structure. The computed reinforcement is then used in a non-linear structural analysis which is viewed as the “actual” SLS verification.
In the second part, the paper examines the same boundary value problem assuming that the excavation takes place in quasi-impermeable cohesive soils, which are modeled with the Hardening Soil model. This example demonstrates the consequences of applying the steady-state type analysis for an intrinsically time-dependent problem. The results of this analysis are compared to the results from the consolidation-type analysis, which are considered as a reference. For both analysis types, the two-phase formulation for partially- saturated medium, after Aubry and Ozanam, is used to describe the interaction between the soil skeleton and pore water pressure.
The analysis of an important drawback of the well known Hardening Soil model (HSM) is the main purpose of this paper. A special emphasis is put on modifying the HSM to enable an appropriate prediction of the undrained shear strength using a nonzero dilatancy angle. In this light, the paper demonstrates an advanced numerical finite element modeling addressed to practical geotechnical problems. The main focus is put on serviceability limit state analysis of a twin-tunnel excavation in London clay. The two-phase formulation for partially saturated medium, after Aubry and Ozanam, is used to describe interaction between soil skeleton and pore water pressure.
Karolina Górska, Zbigniew Muszyński and Jarosław Rybak
., Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance, Wiley, New York, 2004.
 GÓRSKA K., WYJADŁOWSKI M., Analysis of displacement of excavation based on inclinometer measurements, Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 2012, Vol. XXXIV, No. 4.
 KARSZNIA K., Geodezyjny i geotechniczny monitoring obiektów inżynierskich w ujęciu dynamicznym. Wykrywanie słabych punktów. Nowoczesne Budownictwo Inżynieryjne, 2008, No. 4.
 LONG M., Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deepexcavations, ASCE Journal of
Congress, Underground – the way to the future, Geneva, 2013.
5. N. Longanathan, H.G. Poulos, “Analytical prediction for tunneling induced ground movements in clays”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 124 (9), pp 846-856, 1998.
6. R.J. Mair, “Tunneling in urban areas and effects on infrastructure. Advances in research and practice”, Muir Wood Lecture, ITA-AITES materials, 2011.
7. M. Mitew-Czajewska “Evaluation of deepexcavation impact on surrounding structures-a case study”, Underground Infrastructure of Urban Areas 3, CRC Pess
://ibm.gov.in/index.php?c=pages&m=index&id=1008 (Accessed: June 30, 2019)
Modi, J., Bharti, S. and Kant, R., (2017). Applicability of continuous miner in room and pillar mining system: higher production and productivity with safety. In International Conference on DeepExcavation, Energy Resource and Production, Kharagpur.
Vagenas, N., Runciman, N. and Clément, S.R., (1997). A methodology for maintenance analysis of mining equipment. International Journal o/Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 11(1), pp. 33-40.
 LONG M., Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deepexcavations , Journal of Geot. & Geoenv. Eng., 2001, No. 3.
 SROKOSZ P., Back analysis iInverse problems in geotechnics-examples of shape determination , Foundations of Civil and Enviromental Engineering, 2008, No. 8.
 VERMEER P.A., Plaxis. Delft University of Technology , A.A. Balkema, Netherlands, 1994.
 VAIRAKTARIS E., Inverse problems in geomechanics , European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2010, Vol. 14
 FINE Ltd. 2013. GEO5 - Podręcznik użytkownika. Wersja 17.
 LIPIŃSKI M.J., WDOWSKA M.K., A stress history and strain dependent stiffness of overconsolidated cohesive soil, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Land Reclamation, 2011, 43(2), 207-216.
 OU CHANG-YU, DeepExcavation Theory and Practice, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2006.
 PASIK T., KODA E., Analiza sił wewnętrznych i przemieszczeń rozpieranej ściany szczelinowej, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum - Architectura, 2013, 12(4), 121