Marek Blok, Sylwester Kaczmarek and Magdalena Młynarczuk
Science and Technology’, 2006, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 182–189.
 National Marine Electronics Association, NMEA 0183: Standard for interfacing marine electronic devices, version 3.01, 2002.
 Stateczny A., AIS and Radar DataFusion for Maritime Navigation , ‘Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin’, 2004, No. 2, pp. 329–336.
 Terma A/S, SCANTER Track Management Protocol, Document No. 303949 SI, Denmark, 2011, [online], http://www.umgdy.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/WI_SCANTER_TRACK.pdf [access 21.04.2019].
Tamás Tettamanti, Márton Tamás Horváth and István Varga
1. Anand, A., Ramadurai, G. and Vanajakshi, L. (2013). DataFusion Based Traffic Density Estimation and Prediction, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, accepted author version, DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2013.806844
2. Bachmann, C. (2011). Multi-Sensor DataFusion for Traffic Speed and Travel Time Estimation , MSc Thesis, Toronto
3. Böker, G., Lunze, J. (2002). Stability and performance of switching Kalman filters, International Journal of Control , 75(16/17): 1269-1281
4. Claudel, C. G
Milena Stróżyna, Jacek Małyszko, Krzysztof Węcel, Dominik Filipiak and Witold Abramowicz
-oriented sensor datafusion for wide maritime surveillance, Waterside Security Conference (WSS), 2010, pp. 1-6.
 Giraud M. A., Alhadef B., Guarnieri F., Napoli A., Bottala-Gambetta M., et al., SARGOS: Securing Offshore Infrastructures Through a Global Alert and Graded Response System, Maritime System and Technology, 2011, Marseille, France.
 Hevner A., March S. T., Park J., Ram S., Design science in information systems research, ‘MIS Quartely’, 2004, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 75-105.
 International Maritime Organization
Anete Vagale, Agris Ņikitenko, Eduards Slava and Ottar L. Osen
 F. Castanedo, “A Review of DataFusion Techniques,” The Scientific World Journal , vol. 2013, pp. 1–19, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/704504
 J. Thomanek, M. Ritter, H. Lietz, and G. Wanielik, “Comparing Visual DataFusion Techniques Using FIR and Visible Light Sensors to Improve Pedestrian Detection,” 2011 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications , pp. 119–125, Dec. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/dicta.2011.27
 M. Kristou, A. Ohya, and S. Yuta, “Target Person Identification and Following Based
, Hershey, PA, pp. 805–829.
Castanedo, F. (2013). A review of datafusion techniques, The Scientific World Journal 2013 : 704504, DOI: 10.1155/2013/704504.
Cha, Y.-H., Ha, Y.-C., Yoo, J.-I., Min, Y.-S., Lee, Y.-K. and Koo, K.-H. (2017). Effect of causes of surgical delay on early and late mortality in patients with proximal hip fracture, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 137 (5): 625–630.
de Bruijne, M. (2016). Machine learning approaches in medical image analysis: From detection to diagnosis, Medical Image Analysis 33 : 94–97, DOI: 10
Estler, W. T., Edmundson, K. L., Peggs, G. N., Parker, D. H. (2002). Large-scale metrology - an update. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology , 51 (2), 587-608.
Luo, R. C., Yih, C.-C., Su, K. L. (2002). Multisensor fusion and integration: Approaches, applications, and future research directions. IEEE Sensors Journal , 2 (2), 107-119.
More, K., Ingman, D. (2008). Quality approach for multi-parametric datafusion. NDT&E International , 41 (3), 155
Piotr Wężyk, Paweł Hawryło, Marta Szostak, Marcin Pierzchalski and Roeland De Kok
-Resolution Imagery for Urban Land Use Classification. In: IEEE/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Remote Sensing and DataFusion over Urban Area, 35-39. Rome, University of Rome LA Sapienza: IEEE . DOI : 10.1109/ DFUA.2001.985721.
Nussbaum S., Niemeyer I., Canty M.J., 2006. SEaTH - A New Tool for Automated Feature Extraction in the Context of Object-Oriented Image Analysis. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XXXVI-4/C4.
Saadat H., Adamowski J., Bonnell R., Sharifi F., Namdar M., Ale-Ebrahim S., 2011
The problem of inference about the joint distribution of two categorical variables based on knowledge or observations of their marginal distributions, to be referred to as categorical data fusion in this paper, is relevant in statistical matching, ecological inference, market research, and several other related fields. This article organizes the use of proxy variables, to be distinguished from other auxiliary variables, both in terms of their effects on the uncertainty of fusion and the techniques of fusion. A measure of the gains of efficiency is provided, which incorporates both the identification uncertainty associated with data fusion and the sampling uncertainty that arises when the theoretical bounds of the uncertainty space are unknown and need to be estimated. Several existing techniques for generating fusion distributions (or datasets) are described and some new ones proposed. Analysis of real-life data demonstrates empirically that proxy variables can make data fusion more precise and the constructed fusion distribution more plausible.
Jonathan Gessendorfer, Jonas Beste, Jörg Drechsler and Joseph W. Sakshaug
2014, Bari, Italy: 37–40.
Fosdick, B.K., M. DeYoreo and J.P. Reiter. 2016. “Categorical DataFusion using Auxiliary Information.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 10(4): 1907–1929. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS925 .
Fulton, J.A. 2012. Respondent Consent to Use Administrative Data, Ph. D. thesis, University of Maryland.
GDPR. 2016. “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data