Emília Sičáková-Beblavá, Martin Kollárik and Matúš Sloboda
Adsera, A., C. Boix and M. Payne. 2003. “Are you being Served ? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2), 445 – 490.
Banisar, D. 2004. “Global Survey: Freedom of Information and Access to Government Record Laws around the World.” The Freedominfo.org. Publisher not identified.
Bannister, F. and R. Connolly. 2011. “The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government.” Policy & Internet 3(1), 1 – 30.
Beynon-Davies, P. 2007. “Models for e
Saba Eskandarian, Eran Messeri, Joseph Bonneau and Dan Boneh
 Certificate transparency policy (google groups). groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!forum/ct-policy .
 Heather Adkins. An update on attempted man-in-the-middle attacks, 2011. security.googleblog.com/2011/08/update-on-attempted-man-in-middle.html .
 David Basin, Cas Cremers, Tiffany Hyun-Jin Kim, Adrian Perrig, Ralf Sasse, and Pawel Szalachowski. Arpki: Attack resilient public-key infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , pages 382–393. ACM, 2014
Ball C (2009) What is transparency? Public Integrity
Bauhr, M. and Grimes, M. (2014) ‘Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability’
Besley, T., & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review
Bellver, A., & Kaufmann, D. (2005). Transparenting Transparency—Initial Empirics and Policy Applications. Preliminary draft discussion paper presented at the IMF conference on transparency and integrity June 6–7 2005
AIE et al. (2015). The International Standards for Lobbying Regulation. Access Info Europe, Open Knowledge, Sunlight Foundation, Transparency International. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://lobbyingtransparency.net/lobbyingtransparency.pdf.
AIE. (2015). Lobbying Transparency via the Right to Information. Access Info Europe. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from https://www.access-info.org/wp-content/uploads/LobbyTransparencyviaRTI26June2015.pdf.
Begg, I. (2006). Economic Policy and institutional
Law Review, LXXVI(5): 817-844.
de Lhoneux Etienne and Vassilopoulos Christos A., 2014, The European Stability Mechanism Before the Court of Justice of the European Union. Comments on the Pringle Case, Springer.
de Witte Bruno and Beukers Thomas, 2013, ‘The Court of Justice approves the creation of the European Stability Mechanism outside the EU legal order: Pringle’, Common Market Law Review, L(3): 805-848.
Grimmelikhuijsen Stephan, 2012, ‘A good man but a bad wizard. About the limits and the future of transparency
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011). The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet , 3(1), 1-30.
Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2009). Budget transparency, fiscal performance, and political turnout: An international approach. Public Administration Review , 69 (3), 403-417.
Baekgaard, M., Serritzlew, S., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2016). Causes of Fiscal Illusion: Lack of Information or Lack of Attention?. Public Budgeting & Finance , 36 (2), 26-44.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T
Georgia Fragkouli, Katerina Argyraki and Bryan Ford
Can we improve Internet transparency without worsening user anonymity? For a long time, researchers have been proposing transparency systems, where traffic reports produced at strategic network points help assess network behavior and verify service-level agreements or neutrality compliance. However, such reports necessarily reveal when certain traffic appeared at a certain network point, and this information could, in principle, be used to compromise low-latency anonymity networks like Tor. In this paper, we examine whether more Internet transparency necessarily means less anonymity. We start from the information that a basic transparency solution would publish about a network and study how that would impact the anonymity of the network’s users. Then we study how to change, in real time, the time granularity of traffic reports in order to preserve both user anonymity and report utility. We evaluate with real and synthetic data and show that our algorithm can offer a good anonymity/utility balance, even in adversarial scenarios where aggregates consist of very few flows.
, which in this context also means avoiding mistakes, fraud and corruption ( ibid. ). The tools to achieve this are known, but their use in practice is a problem. This also applies to the principle of transparency in public procurement, which is one of the fundamental principles intended to contribute to the objectives outlined above. Halonen (2016) .
In Slovenia, approx. EUR 4 billion is spent through public procurement every year, which accounts for around 40% of the national budget expenditure. Ministry of Public Administration (2016) . Since Slovenia was severely
Sonja Schwaiger, Jutta Ransmayr, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Sabine Sommer-Lolei and Wolfgang U. Dressler
Barz, I. 1983. “Wortbedeutung und Wortbildungsbedeutung”. Zeitschrift fur Germanistik 4. 65-69.
Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourque, S.Y. 2014. Toward a typology of semantic transparency: The case of French compounds. (PhD dissertation, Department of French Studies, University of Toronto.)
Clark, E.V. 1993. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbin, D. 1987. Morphologie
Adam, A. (2015). Fiscal Transparency in the European Union. Theoretical and Applied Economics Volume XXII , No 1 (602). Retrieved from http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1070.pdf .
Baran, J., Mikołajczyk, K. (2015). Jak udostępniać obywatelom dane o finansach publicznych . Retrieved from http://ibs.org.pl/app/uploads/2016/04/IBS_Podrecznik_udostepniania.pdf .
Filipiak, B. (2011). Finanse samorządowe. Nowe wyzwania bieżące i perspektywiczne. Warszawa: Difin.
IMF (2004). International Monetary Fund, Country Report No. 04