Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 items :

  • "Sociotechnical transitions" x
Clear All

Abstract

Mobilising knowledges across a geography creates opportunities for transitions to smart systems. Publics in a geography are consequently able to form their perspectives around a system and align potential benefits with their needs. Intelligent transport systems are an example of smart living and EVs are cited as an alternative technology that are key to their application. This conceptual paper uses EVs as an example to demonstrate how knowledge mobilisation relating to such technologies can better cater to a geography’s needs. Unfortunately, current EV studies focus on a rural-urban binary. Thus, this conceptual contribution reflects on a study in Cornwall, UK, to reveal the heterogeneous influences on rural EV-related perspectives. This heterogeneity manifests both in particular locations and across cases. Overall a suite of transferrable participatory methods to improve rural knowledge mobilisation is outlined.

‘the Comarca de Verín’, Galicia (Spain). In McDonagh, J. Nienaber, B. & Woods, M. (eds) Globalization and Europe's Rural Regions. Aldershot: Ashgate. Eernstman, N. & Wals, A. E. J. (2009). Interfacing knowledge systems. Introducing certified organic agriculture in a tribal society. NJAS 56(4), 375-390. Doi: 10.1016/S1573-5214(09)80005-5. Geels, F. W. & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research policy 36(3), 399-417. Doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Martinez-Alier, J

] Papachristos G. System dynamics modelling and simulation for sociotechnical transitions research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2018:31:248–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.10.001 [31] Feofilovs M. et al . Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 2020:11(5):615–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2020-0013

] Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T. & Sorrell, S. (2017). The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions. Joule 1(3), 463–479. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018. [23] Geels, F. W. & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy . 36(3), 399–417. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003. [24] Glossary of terms (2012). In: Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Plattner, G.-K., Allen, S. K., Tignor, M. & Midgley, P. M., eds., Managing the Risks of

Denkfallen bei planerischen Abwägungs- und Bewertungsverfahren – Erkenntnisse aus den Kognitionswissenschaften Othengrafen F. Schmidt-Lauber B. Hannemann C. Pohlan J. Roost F. Jahrbuch StadtRegion 2015/2016. Schwerpunkt: Planbarkeiten Opladen 43 – 59 Geels, F.W.; Schot, J. (2007): Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. In: Research Policy 36, 3, 399-417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Geels F.W.; Schot, J. 2007 Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways Research Policy 36 3 399 – 417 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Gugerell, K.; Zuidema, C. (2017): Gaming for