Kristjansson, J.T. Iceland as a ‘powerful’ smallstate in the international community. Working Paper, Reykjavik: University of Iceland
Lrt, 2014. L. Linkevičius pabrėžė Lietuvos vaidmenį remiant Ukrainą. Lrt, [online] 18 December 2014. Available at: < http://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/lietuvoje/2/85477 > (accessed 05 March 2016).
Lamoreaux, J.W., 2014. Acting small in a large state‘s world: Russia and Baltic States. European Security, [e-journal] 23(4).
Lamoreaux, J.W. and Galbreath, D.J., 2010. The Baltic States As ‘Small States’: Negotiating The ‘East’ By
The article addresses Lithuania’s foreign policy vis-à-vis the Eastern Partnership programme in 2009-2014 from the perspective of small states’ abilities to influence decision making processes within the European Union. The author aims at revealing the puzzle of Lithuania’s marginal capacities of absolute power being disproportional to the output of its foreign policy towards implementation of the Eastern Partnership programme and hence utilising “smart state strategy” conceptualised by Anders Wivel. The novelty of the study rests on expansion of applying the smart state strategy towards the post-negotiation stage of the policy implementation. The article contributes to the debate over the applicability of the “smart state strategy” approach towards the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union, by arguing that Lithuania’s foreign policy vis-à-vis the Eastern Partnership programme in 2009-2014 does indeed serve as an example of such behaviour, however recognising Lithuania’s initial shift from utilising “small state policy” to “smart state strategy”.
), ‘Multilateralism in NZ Foreign Policy,’ beehive.govt.nz, 19 April 2005. Retrieved from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/node/21717 [accessed 1 Jul 2012]
Henderson, J. (1980), ‘The Foreign Policy of a SmallState,’ in J. Henderson, W. K. Jackson & R. Kennaway (eds.) Beyond New Zealand: the Foreign Policy of a SmallState, Auckland: Methuen.
Holland, M.; Chaban, N.; Bain, J.; Stats, K. & Sutthisripok, P., eds. (2005), EU in the Views of Asia-Pacific Elites: Australia, New Zealand and Thailand, NCRE Research Series Working Paper, no. 5, Christchurch
1 Bőrzel (2002: 205) identified that the EU ‘latecomers’ face a ‘double disadvantage’ in the EU as they lack sufficient staff power, money, and expertise to shape the EU policies.
2 Grøn and Wivel (2011: 523) suggest that ‘smallstate smart strategy’ involves a state as (1) a lobbyist, (2) a self-interested mediator, and (3) a norm entrepreneur.
Bailer, S. 2004. Bargaining Success in the European Union. European Union Politics , 5(1), pp. 99–123.
Baun, M. and Marek, D. 2013 (eds.). The New Member States and the European Union
Arter, D. (2000), ‘Smallstate influence within the EU: the case of Finland’s ‘Northern Dimension Initiative’,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies , vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00260
Björkdahl, A. (2008), ‘Norm advocacy: a smallstate strategy to influence the EU,’ Journal of European Public Policy , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701702272
Blavoukos, S. & Bourantonis, D. (2012), ‘Policy entrepreneurs and foreign policy change: the Greek–Turkish rapprochement
: rezultatyvumo vertinimas [An Operation of Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan: An Assessment of Effectiveness]. Bachelor thesis. Vilnius: Vilnius University, 2009.
Bačiulis, Audrius. "Rusija netikėtai atsigręţė į Lietuvą [Russia Has Unexpectedly Turned to Lithuania]." Veidas (February 15, 2010): 18-19.
Balslev, Uffe. "The Danish Case: International Involvement as the SmallState's Remedy for Great Power Dominance": 107-124. In: Laurent Goetschel, ed. Small States Inside and Outside the European Union: Interests
Archer, C., Bailes, A. J. K., Wivel, A., 2014. Small States and International Security: Europe and Beyond. Abingdon: Routledge.
Archer, C., 2014. The Nordic States and Security. In: Bailes, A.J.,Wivel, A., Clive, A. ed. Small States and International Security: Europe and Beyond. Routledge, pp. 95-112.
Bailes, A. J. K., Thayer, B. A., Thorhallsson, B., 2016. Alliance theory and alliance ‘Shelter’: the complexities of smallstate alliance behavior. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, Vol1, p.9-26.
Bailes, A. J. K., Rickli
of State in Iceland . Web. 28 June 2016, < http://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/eem/1315-olafur-ragnar-grimsson-re-elected-for-a-5th-mandate-as-head-ofstate-in-iceland>.
Thorhallsson, B., The Icelandic Crash and its Consequences: A SmallState without Economic and Political Shelter, [in:] Small States in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, eds. Steinmetz R., Wivel A., Ashgate Publishing 2013.
Tokarski, T., Kryzys? Islandia nie ratowała banków, ale uciekła przed widmem Unii. . Web. 28 June 2016, <http://www.pch24.pl
://www.eda.europa.eu/info-hub/defence-data-portal [Accessed 4 September 2017].
 Finnish Defence Forces, 2017. Lebanon UNIFIL [online] Available at: http://ilmavoimat.fi/en/web/kansainvalinenkriisinhallinta/lebanon-unifil [Accessed 31 August 2017].
 Hey, J., 2003. Introducing SmallState Foreign Policy. In: Hey, J. ed. 2003. Small States in World Politics. Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior . Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. pp. 1-12.
 International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2017. The Military Balance . London: Routledge for International Institute for Strategic Studies
In this article, Lithuania's relations with Russia from 2004 to 2014 are examined. This analysis is not much of a challenge in itself: there have been no significant changes in the overall quality of the two countries' relations, no new issues of disagreement, and the countries' approaches to each other have also remained unchanged. This analysis is significant in a different way-relations with Russia motivate and induce Lithuania's entire foreign policy arena, from its strategies to the country's everyday debates. Understanding Lithuania's relations with Russia leads to insights regarding Lithuania's geopolitical thinking and how Lithuania represents itself. Therefore, in this article, the goal is to demonstrate that an analysis of Lithuanian-Russian relations since 2004 not only explains Lithuanian foreign policy, but also reveals an enduring and negative stability in bilateral relations notwithstanding constant turbulence and quarrels.