Search Results

1 - 10 of 405 items :

Clear All

References Allison, Henry. 1995. Kant’s theory of freedom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Allison, Henry. 1996. Kant on Freedom: a reply to my critics. In Idealism and Freedom: essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Almeida, Guido. 2002. Sobre as “Fórmulas” do Imperativo Categórico. In DOMINGUES, Ivan., PINTO, Roberto Paulo M., DUARTE, Rodrigo. Ética, Política e Cultura . Belo Horizonte: ed. UFMG. Almeida, Guido. 2009. Fundamenta ão da Metafísica dos Costumes / Immanuel Kant. Tradu ão com

References CASH, M. (2002): Distancing Kantian Ethics and Politics from Kant’s Views on Women. In: Minerva , 6, pp. 103–150. DENIS, L. (2001): From Friendship to Marriage: Revising Kant. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , 63(1), pp. 1–28. ELAM, D. (2010): Women on the Edge of Modernity. In: Women: A Cultural Review , 11(1/2), pp. 118–130. GANGAVANE, D. (2004): Kant on Femininity. In: Indian Philosophical Quarterly , 31, pp. 359–376. KANT, I. (1997): Lectures on Ethics , trans. by Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. KANT, I. (1996

Economics, 37(10), pp. 755-763. Ern, V.F., 1991, From Kant to Krupp. In: Works, Moscow, pp. 308-319. Filatov, V.P., 2012, Human models in social sciences. Epistemology & philosophy of science, 31 (1), pp. 125-140. Kalinnikov, L.A., 2010, On the moralcentrism of Kant’s transcendental anthropology and the role of morals in human nature. Kantovskij Sbornik, 4 (34), pp. 21-33. Kant, I., 1900, Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin. Kant, I., 1929, Critique of pure reason (Norman Kemp Smith, tr.), London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd. Kant I., 1991, The Metaphysics of

, Vol. I, Macmillan, London, 254–340. Conrey, B. (2003), “The Riemann Hypothesis”, Notices of AMS , March, 341–353. Coxeter, H.S.M. (1998), Non-Euclidean Geometry (sixth ed.), The Mathematical Association of America. De Jong, W.R. (1997), “Kant’s Theory of Geometrical Reasoning and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. On Hintikka’s Interpretation of Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science , 28 (1), 141–166. Desanti, J.-T. (1983), Les idéalités mathématiques , Seuil, Paris. Donaldson, S.K. (1983), “An application of gauge

OPEN ACCESS

: https://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/JAHLF-on-PAV-declaration.pdf KANT, I. (1908): Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Akademieausgabe , vol. VI, ed. Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Reimer. KANT, I. (1911): Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten , Akademieausgabe , vol. IV, ed. Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Reimer. KANT, I. (1913): Kritik der praktischen Vernunft , Akademieausgabe , vol. XIX, ed. Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Reimer. KANT, I. (1914

The purpose of this paper is to advance a new understanding of Immanuel Kant's view of punishment which will, in turn, cause us to reevaluate our penal practices. One might be skeptical of the possibility of saying anything new in this area, as much ink has been spilled about punishment generally and, more specifically, punishment from a Kantian perspective. I aim to show, however, that the traditional interpretations of Kantian punishment are problematic—and that a more compelling interpretation should cause us to embrace fairer practices in the criminal justice

References BELÁS, Ľ. (1994): Kantova filozofia dejín a „praktický rozum“ [Kant’s Philosophy of History and “Practical Reason”]. In: Filozofia , 49(2), pp. 72–77. BELÁS, Ľ. (2005): Sociálne dôsledky Kantovej etiky [Social Consequences of Kant’s Ethic]. In: Filozofia , 60(4), pp. 254–268. CASSIRER, E. (1981): Kant’s Life and Thought , trans. by J. Haden. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. HABERMAS, J. (1991): The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society , trans. by T. Burger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT

References Allison, H. (2006). ‘Kant’s Transcendental Idealism’. In G. Bird (Author), A Companion to Kant (pp. 111-124). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Allison, H. E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defence. New Haven: Yale University Press Allison, H. E. (2012). ‘Transcendental Realism, Empirical Realism, and Transcendental Idealism’. In H. E. Allison (Author), Essays on Kant (pp. 67-83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Berkeley, G. (1999). Principles of Human Knowledge: And, Three Dialogues (Oxford World’s Classics) (H. Robinson, Ed

REFERENCES 1. Aristotle. (2003). Nicomachean Ethics. Novi Sad: Izdavacka Knjizarnica Zorana Stojanovica Sremski Karlovci. 2. Babic, J. (2007). Good Will. Theoria, 50(4), 7 - 20. 3. Babic, J. (2008). Ethics And Moral. Theoria, 51(1), 35 - 48. 4. Brkljacic, M. (2007). Ethics And Sports. Medicina Fluminensis, 43(3), 230-233. 5. Brkljacic Zagrovic, M., Brkljacic Beg, S., Mavrinac, M., Sorta-Bilajac Turina, I., Bunjevac, I., & Cengic, T. (2011). Can A Modern Sport Exist Without Its Ethics? – The Need For Systemic Education. Jahr, 2(3), 93-110. 6. Kant, I. (2008

References ARIS, R. (1965): History of Political Thought in Germany, 1789 – 1815 . London: Frank Cass and Co. BENBOW, H. M. (2006): The Woman Should Reign and the Man Govern: Gendering Kant’s Body Politic. In: Melbourne Journal of Politics , 30, pp. 80–97. CASH, M. (2002): Distancing Kantian Ethics and Politics from Kant’s Views on Women. In: Minerva , 6, pp. 103–150. DENIS, L. (2001): From Friendship to Marriage: Revising Kant. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , 63(1), pp. 1–28. DERANTY, J.-P. (2000): The Son of Civil Society: Tensions in Hegel