Intelligence is the traditional element of interest when measuring the human cognitive abilities. However, intelligence is complex and researchers are constantly finding new angles of looking at it. One such angle is reflective reasoning. Sometimes individuals choose to override the intuitive answer and by engaging in further reflection they reach the correct answer. The cognitive reflection test (CRT) measures a person’s ability to suppress their incorrect intuitive answer in favor of reflection that should then lead to the correct response. The test contains three short mathematically based problems, which measure, among others, cognitive ability, mathematical abilities and cognitive reflection. Using a sample of 195 students from a state university, one of the largest universities in Romania, we explore the extent to which a variety of phenomena and trends identified by previous findings on CRT show similar results on our sample.
This paper focuses on cybersecurity knowledge, claiming that this knowledge may have a value of its own, and suggests a market mechanism to foster the creation of this kind of value. The goal is to elaborate the value of cybersecurity knowledge and propose a semantic approach with an example model to enable better handling of the relevant body of knowledge and its value. The problem of attributing value to cybersecurity should be perceived as analogous to that in information technology. We have examined the relevant body of knowledge with a focus on its characteristics from the viewpoint of different types of market players and their interests. By applying our model, it is possible to increase the accessibility of knowledge and observe externalities from sharing thereof.
We live in an information society for which the Internet, as a global system of connections between computers and, consequently, databases stored in them, plays a highly important part. Hence, more and more real property data are available. This article is devoted to the analysis of the opportunities to purchase the Register of Real Estate Prices and Values (RREPV) online from county geoportals. RREPV is one of the sources of information used in the process of real estate value estimation. Pursuant to § 74 of the Regulation on the Land and Property Register, the register is kept by the head of the county. There are 380 counties in Poland, including 66 city counties. Such a big number of administrative units in Poland, along with a great variety of different information and communication systems used for keeping RREPV, results in the fact that online access to the register data is not possible everywhere. The aim of the paper is to present the spatial layout of counties which: created the opportunity to access the National Geodetic and Cartographic Resource data via county geoportals, launched special modules for handling real estate appraisers and made it possible to purchase RREPV data online.
Literature Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2010). Certain and Uncertain Utility. The Allais Paradox and Five Decision Theory Phenomena. Levine’s Working Paper Archive 926159295 . Retrieved from https://pdfs.semantic-scholar.org/83da/ed55d89ad8d0b94ac72e509dbb11-8983-f069.pdf Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., & Liu, N. (2016). Group Decision rules and group rationality under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 52 (2), 99-116. Bakacsi, Gy. (2015). Valtozo vezetesi paradigma – valtozo megbizo ugynok problema? [Changing leader-paradigm – changing principal
://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/61046 (accessed 10th June 2014). De Martino, B., D. Kumuran, B. Seymour, and R. Dolan. 2006. “Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain.” Science 313: 684-687. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/313/5787/684.full.pdf?sid¼e7dcf2c8-5bbb-4d89-97f2-5344613de9bf (accessed 10th June 2014). Duncan, G., S. Keller-McNulty, and L. Stokes. 2001. Disclosure Risk vs Data Utility: the R-U Confidentiality Map. NISS Technical Report no. 121. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid¼6BF9C4E902605252F4302A43786EF152
References Allais, M. (1988, December 9). An Outline of My Main Contributions to Economic Science. Lecture notes distributed in Nobel Lectures. France, Paris. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1988/allais-lecture.html , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00134634 Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2010). Certain and Uncertain Utility. The Allais Paradox and Five Decision Theory Phenomena. Levine’s Working Paper Archive 926159295. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/83da/ed55d89ad8d0b94ac72e509dbb118983f069.pdf Arrow, K. J. (1984). The
storitev v zdravstvu od 1.1. 2012 dalje. Pridobljeno 25.1.2012 s spletne strani: http://www.zzzs.si/zzzs/pao/izvajalci.nsf/o/0C38E1F23D89C18FC125796F00173041. 27. Zakonodaja Republike Slovenije. Zakon o duševnem zdravju Republike Slovenije. Pridobljeno 20.1.2012 s spletne strani: http:// zakonodaja.gov.si/rpsi/r07/predpis_ZAKO2157.html. 28. Zavod za zdravstveno zavarovanje Republike Slovenije. Recept glasilo, zadnja verzija. Pridobljeno 20. 1. 2012 s spletne strani: http://www.zzzs.si/ZZZS/info/egradiva.nsf/0/2e6416e75fe33f0 5c125796c00492304/$FILE/Bilten%20Recept_%C5%A
the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gliwice of the 15.10.2014] [online]. [Access 19.01.2016]. Available at: http://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl/doc/91544C7772 IV SA/Po 4/13 - Wyrok Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Poznaniu z dnia 27.03.2013 r. [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Poznan of the 27.03.2013] [online]. [Access 19.01.2016]. Available at: http://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl/doc/C4FE1D89F5 IV SA/Wa 750/10 - Wyrok Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Warszawie z dnia 25.08.2010 r. [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw of
/1 – 2011 i CBS Observer. Hansen L. 2011 CBS gør det godt i konkurrencen om forskningsmidler Indlæg d 25 1 – i CBS Observer Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research policy, 41(2), 251–261. Hicks D. 2012 Performance-based university research funding systems Research policy 41 2 251 261 Regeringen (2005). Offentlig forskning – mere konkurrence og bedre kvalitet. Baggrundsnotat til Globaliseringsrådets drøftelse på mødet d. 8.-9. december 2005. Regeringen. Regeringen 2005 Offentlig forskning – mere konkurrence og bedre kvalitet