Search Results

1 - 10 of 43 items :

  • "Current Population Survey" x
Clear All

Abstract

While usually lauded, "empathic giving" may actually lead to suboptimal outcomes due in part to the enhancement of tribal sentiments in individual interactions, as well as by decisions driven more by emotional, rather than rational, considerations in the giving process. This point is linked to recent suggestions that government should reform social safety nets in order to decrease these negative interactions, and increase their efficacy. To this end, we use analyses of the September Supplements to the Current Population Survey in order to explore and find a negative change in individual-level volunteering subsequent to hurricanes Katrina and Ike, but not after hurricane Charley. We also find variations by region, and in particular, in "Deep Blue" states, as well as by whether individuals were located in the hurricane-affected states. Our findings are consistent with the notion that empathy may lead to more problems, including burnout and stratified giving, with implications for a public or private call to action.

Health Expenditure Accounts: Methodology Paper, 2013 . Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/dsm-13.pdf (accessed March 2018). Davern, M., H. Rodin, L.A. Blewett, and K.T. Call. 2007. “Are the Current Population Survey Uninsurance Estimates Too High? An Examination of the Imputation Process.” Health Services Research 42(5): 2038–2055. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00703.x . Day, J. 2013. “Medicare and

and Data Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 574–584. Hess, J. and E. Singer. 1995. “The Role of Respondent Debriefing Questions in Questionnaire Development”. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, August 13–17, 1995. 1075–1080. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers/1995_187.pdf (accessed on February 5, 2016). Klerman, J.A., M. Davern, K.T. Call, V. Lynch, and J. Ringel. 2009. “Understanding the Current Population Survey’s Insurance Estimates and the Medicaid

.” SAGE Open 6: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671770 . Ellis, R., M. Virgile, J. Holzberg, D. Nelson, J. Edgar, P. Phipps, and R. Kaplan. 2017. “Assessing the Feasibility of Asking about Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Current Population Survey: Results from Cognitive Interviews.” Technical Report, Center for Survey Measurement, U.S. Census Bureau; Office of Survey Methods Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/cps_sogi_cognitive_interview_report.pdf (accessed February 2018). Fazio, R.H. 1986

–259. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn013 . Eberly, T., M.B. Pohl, and S. Davis. 2009. “Undercounting Medicaid enrollment in Maryland: Testing the accuracy of the current population survey.” Population Research and Policy Review 28(2): 221–236. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9078-5 . Farley-Short, P. 2001. Counting and Characterizing the Uninsured. Available at: http://rwjf-eriu.org/pdf/farleyshort-final.pdf (accessed March 2019). Fertig, A.R., J. Pascale, K.T. Call, and D. Oellerich. 2018. Design and Sampling Strategy for a Validation Study Linking

American Statistician 60: 251-256. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/000313006X126819. Hicks, W. and J. Kerwin. 2011. “Cognitive Testing of Potential Changes to the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey.” Unpublished Westat report to the U.S. Census Bureau. July 25, 2011. Butrica, B.A., I. Howard, K.E. Smith, and E.J. Toder. 2009. “The Disappearing Defined Benefit Pensions and Its Potential Impact on the Retirement Income of Baby Boomers.” Social Security Bulletin 69: 1-28. Meyer, B.D., W.K.C. Mok, and J.X. Sullivan. 2009. “The Under

.K. Shevell. 1985. “The Subjective Dates of Natural Events in Very-Long-Term Memory.” Cognitive Psychology 17(2): 139 – 177. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90006-4 . Bureau of Labor Statistics. Undated. “Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey: Frequently Asked Questions.” Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/faq.htm (accessed June 2018). Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, May 2017.” Available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/conemp.pdf (accessed June 2018). Cohany, S.R. 1996

.” Science 185: 1124-1131. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1983. “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.” Psychological Review 90: 293-315. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293. U.S. Census Bureau. 2013. Current Population Survey Interviewing Manual. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/techdoc/cps/CPS_Manual_June2013.pdf (accessed September 11, 2015). U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. Current Population Survey (CPS) and American Community Survey (ACS): Coding

://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/-toward-a-benefit%20cost-theory-of-survey-participation-evidence-further-tests-and-implications.pdf (accessed June 2020). U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2006. “Design and Methodology: Current Population Survey.” Technical Paper: 66. Available at: https://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/tp-66.pdf (accessed March 2019).

–4. Feldstein M.S., (2011), Te Euro and European Economic Conditions, NBER Working Paper 17617, Cambridge (http://www.nber.org/papers/w17617.pdf?new_window=1, accessed: 01-08-2013). Gáková Z., Dijkstra L., (2008), Labour mobility between the regions of the EU-27 and a comparison with the USA, “Regional Focus”, Directorate -General for Regional Policy, No. 2. Kaplan G., Schulhofer -Wohl S., (2011), Interstate Migration Has Fallen Less Tan You Tink: Consequences of Hot Deck Imputation in the Current Population Survey, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Research Department