Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 items :

  • "Conservation action" x
Clear All

Abstract

Lotus sanguineus is one of the endemic taxa from Mediterranean Region of Turkey. It has hitherto been known from type locality and was assessed under VU and EN categories despite the lack of information on the population size, number of location and habitat quality. This study aims to determine the global conservation status and conservation strategies of the narrow endemic species. We collected all available data and evaluated them with the field studies. We reported the sizes of populations, altitude, coordinates, habitat types and the threats it faces for each locality. GeoCAT analyses at global levels indicate the extent of occurrence 19.965 km2 and area of occupancy 9 km2 and there could be an inferred decline due to habitat loss and fragmentation of the original population, suggesting this species might be classified as Critically Endangered, based on criterium B1ab (i, ii, iii) + 2ab (i, ii, iii) in the Red List categorization. Conservation priorities include life history and ecology studies, in-situ conservation, population monitoring and ex-situ conservation to prevent the destruction of the existing gene pool.

                                                                                                                               USE AND TRADE  CONSERVATION ACTIONS                 CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Abstract

Autochthonous genetic resources of woody plants have become seriously endangered in Flanders because of the particularly low and fragmented forest cover, centuries of intensive forest use in this highly populated area and the wide-spread usage of non-autochthonous planting stock in reforestation and landscape plantings. Intraspecific hybridisation between remnant autochthonous populations and foreign genotypes, which can show inadequate adaptation, may influence the autochthonous genetic constitution and fitness in the long term. As several European countries face similar problems, the objective of this paper is to outline the conservation measures that are taken in Flanders. The central aim is to maintain and create the necessary conditions for natural and flexible evolution of the genetic diversity of autochthonous trees and shrubs. An inventory survey to locate remaining autochthonous populations was started in 1997 and will be completed in 2006. Relict populations are preserved in clonal banks. Central issues are the production of autochthonous planting stock through in situ seed collection, the approval of seed sources and stands and the creation of seed orchards. Conservation actions are discussed.

Abstract

There is scarce information on the migration patterns and population size of the Eurasian marsh harrier (Circus aeruginosus) in Iraq in general and in the southern Mesopotamian wetlands in particular. From February 2018–April 2019, a total of 11 field expeditions were conducted in the Central Marshes (219,700 ha), one of the major Mesopotamian wetlands and Iraq’s National Park, a RAMSAR and UNESCO site. Two of the field survey objectives were to determine the spatial and temporal distribution and estimate the population size of the migratory/wintering Eurasian marsh harrier in the Central Marshes. Distance sampling on three line-transects covering a study plot of 40,000 ha was conducted. Among other wintering Circus harriers, the Eurasian marsh harrier was the most abundant species with a total of 93 individuals recorded. The estimated species densities were 0.0042–0.035 individuals/ha, and the estimated size of the Eurasian marsh harrier migratory population in the Central Marshes was 922.7–7,689.5 individuals. Moreover, the migration phenology and breeding status of the Eurasian marsh harrier in the Central Marshes were investigated. Our efforts did not confirm the breeding of this species during recent years, or since the inundation of the Mesopotamian wetlands in 2003. Furthermore, hunting and trapping were identified as major threats affecting the species which need urgent conservation action.

                                                                                                                                                                              USE AND TRADES                  CONSERVATION ACTIONS

, African Primates: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan . Gland. IUCN. Oslisly, R & Peyrot, B 1993, Les gravures rupestres de la vallée de l’Ogooué (Gabon) . ed. Sépia, Paris. Plan de gestion du Parc National de la Lopé 2006–2011 , 2006, CNPN, Libreville Rapac , 2015. Available from : < http://www.rapac.org/index.php?option=com_docman&view=document&layout=default&alias=174-Photographic-and-Tourism-Potential-Report-on-8-RAPAC-pilot-sites-located-in-8-central-african-countr&category_slug=developpementtouristique&Itemid=100206 >. [16.02.2015]. Tripadvisor. Lope Hotel

Carolina as critical shorebird habitat. – Chat 54: 69–92. Meine, C. D. & Archibald, G. W. 1996. The cranes: status survey and conservation action plan. – IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 1–207. Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. – Nature 421: 37–42. DOI: 10.1038/nature01286 Peñuelas, J. & Filella, I. 2001. Responses to a warming world. – Science 26: 793–795. Prange, H. 1999. Migration of Common Crane Grus grus in Europe. – Vogelwelt 120: 301–305. Sparks, T. H., Bairlein, F., Bojarinova, J. G

., Tomialojć L. 1997. Blackbird. In: The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance (Hagemeijer WJM, Blair MJ, eds.), T & A D Poyser, London. 544-545. Nesje M., Rřed K. H. 2000. Sex identification in falcons using microsatellite DNA markers. Hereditas. 132: 261-263. Newton I. 2004. The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis. 146: 579-600. Sacharczuk M., Jaszczak K., Kruszewicz A. 2002. Sex identification in monomorphic birds - a review. Pr. Mater. Zoot. 60: 35

:345-353. Pucek, Z., Belousova, I. P., Krasińska, M., Krasiński, Z. A., Olech, W., 2004: European bison. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Bison Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Stoate, C., Boatman, N. D., Borralho, R. J., Rio Carvalho, C., de Snoo, G. R., Eden, P., 2001: Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 63:337-365. Sztolcman, J. 1926: European bison its history habits and future. Warszawa: The Central Union of Polish Associations of Hunting. Verkaar, E. L. C., Beeke, M., Hanekamp, E

-sucking bug in a hollow egg. J. Ornithol., 147, 115-118. Bodmer, R. E., Brooks, D. M. 1997. Status and Action Plan of the Lowland Tapir (Tapirus terrestris). In: Brooks, D. M., Bodmer, R. E., Matola, S., eds. Tapirs - Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Tapir Specialist Group, Cambridge. Available at http://www.tapirback.com/tapirgal/iucn-ssc/tsg/action97/cover.htm Capitanio, J. P., Mendoza, S. P., McChesney, M. 1996. Influence of blood sampling procedures on basal hypothalamic pituitary adrenal hormone levels and leukocyte values in rhesus macaques