Search Results

1 - 10 of 151 items :

  • "Cognitive linguistics" x
Clear All

Bibliografia AUER, Peter: Jazyková interakce. Sociolingvistická edice. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny 2014, s. 24 – 35. (prekl. J. Nekvapil) BELAJ, Branimir – TANACKOVIĆ FALETAR Goran: Space, Conceptualization and Case Meaning: A Cognitive Account of the Dative in Croatian. In: Cognitive Linguistics Between Universality and Variation. Eds. M. Brdar – I. Rafaelli – M. Žic Fuchs. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2012, s. 53 – 92. BÜHLER, Karl: Exprese – apel – reprezentace. In: Auer, P.: Jazyková interakce. Sociolingvistická edice. Praha

References Attardo, Salvatore, Victor Raskin (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor , 4:3–4: 293–347. Booth, Wayne C. (1983). The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press Coulson, Seana (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Coulson, Seana, Esther Pascual (2006). For the sake of argument: Mourning the unborn and reviving the dead through conceptual blending. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4

in ExELL

Pragmatics 36: 1231–1252. Dirven, René (1999). Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Radden Günter, eds. Metonymy in Language and Thought . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 275-287. Goossens, Louis (1990). Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323–340 Goossens, Louis (1995). Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions for linguistic action. Goossens, Louis, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon

in ExELL

(2), 163–207. Cienki, A. (1998). STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics , 9 (2), 107–149. Corum, M. (2019, May). Conceptual construal and the creole lexicon. 7th Conference of the Scandinavian Association for Language and Cognition, Aarhus, Denmark. Dutton, T., & Thomas, D. (1995). A new course in Tok Pisin (New Guinea Pidgin). Canberra, ACT: Australian National University. Engelberg, S., & Stolberg, D. (2017). The influence of German on the lexicon of Tok Pisin. In P. Maitz & C. A. Volker (Eds.), Language contact in the

References Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Grady, Joseph. 2007. “Metaphor” in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 188-214. Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lakoff, George. 1993

coordinate structure constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 88-92. Hamawand, Zeki. 2016. Semantics. A cognitive account of linguistic meaning. Sheffield: Equinox. Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Coordinating constructions: An overview. In M. Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 1-40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Coordination. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, 1-51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Janda, Laura. 2015. Cognitive linguistics in the Year 2015. Cognitive Semantics 1

, Cliff. 2011. Introduction to philosophy of complex systems A. In Hooker, Cliff (ed.), Philosophy of complex system , 3-90. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Janda, Laura. 2015. Cognitive linguistics in the Year 2015. Cognitive Semantics 1. 131-154. Kallas, Krystyna. 1993. Składnia współczesnych polskich konstrukcji współrzędnych . Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Karłowicz, Jan & Kryński, Adam & Niedźwiedzki, Władysław. 1927. Słownik języka polskiego . Tom VIII . Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Kasy im. Mianowskiego Instytutu Popierania Nauki. Malchukov, Andrej

energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 202-212. CHILTON, P., 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. CHUM, H. L. and OVEREND, R., 2001. Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel Processing Technology, vol.71, no. 1, pp. 187-195. CROFT, W. and CRUSE , D. A., 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DE CILLIA, R., et al., 1999. The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, vol. 10, no. 2

.), Cognitive linguistics in the year 2017 (pp. 172–184). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar . New York: OxfordUniversity Press. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Imrényi, A., Kugler, N., Ladányi, M., Markó, A., Tátrai, S., & Tolcsvai Nagy, G. (2017). Nyelvtan . Budapest: OsirisKiadó. Kardos,É. (2016). Telicity marking in Hungarian. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics , 1 (1), 41. Kenesei, I., Vago, R., & Fenyvesi, A

than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 43-62. Clark, J. M. and Paivio, A. 1991: Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 233-62. Croft, W. & Cruise, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dancyngier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2015). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Danesi, M. (1992). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: The neglected dimension. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and