Academia in CentralandEasternEurope. Accounting & Management Information Systems, 14(2), 247-274.
Albu, C. N., Albu, N., and Alexander, D., 2014. When Global Accounting Standards Meet the Local Context: Insights from an Emerging Economy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(6), 489-510. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.005
Albu, N., and Albu, C. N., 2012. International Financial Reporting Standards in an Emerging Economy: Lessons from Romania. Australian Accounting Review, 22(4), 341-352. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10
eco-systems: A European mapping report Updated country report: Slovakia. Retrieved from European Commission, Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion Website: ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=16382&langId=en .
Labaye, E., Sjåtil, P.E., Bogdan, W., Novak, J., Mischke, J., Fruk, M., Ionuțiu, O. (2013). A new dawn: Reigniting growth in CentralandEasternEurope . Retrieved from McKinsey Global Institute Website: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/europe/a-new-dawn-reigniting-growth-in-central-and-eastern-europe .
O’Byrne, D., Lean, J., Moizer, J
Institutional analysis has been generally accepted as a necessary way of understanding socioeconomic development. There are several studies in the literature which use this methodology in the investigation of the transition from a socialist to a capitalist system and the stabilized institutional arrangement of post-socialist countries. This paper examines how institutional analysis can contribute to the understanding of the current position and future perspectives of CentralandEasternEuropean (CEE) countries which are European Union (EU
Multicultural Societiesʼ, Vol. 6, No. 2.
Dasgupta B. (1981), Rural‑urban Migration and Rural Development, [in:] J. Balan (ed.) Why People Move, UNESCO, Paris.
Dustmann Ch., et al. (2003), The Impact of EU Enlargement on Migration Flows, Home Office Online Report 25/03.
Duszczyk M., Matuszczyk K. (2014), Migration in the 21st Century from the Perspective of CEE Countries - an Opportunity or a Threat? CentralandEasternEuropean Development Institute, Warsaw.
Gabrielczak P., Kucharski L., Kwiatkowski E. (2015
Vigoda, E. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review , 62(5), 527–540.
Vintar, M., Rosenbaum, A., Jenei, G., Drechsler, W. (eds.) (2013). The Past, Present and the Future of Public Administration in CentralandEasternEurope . Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.
for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 456-473.
Szyjko, C.T. (2011). Future of the European social model. Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 84-96.
Timofei, L. (2011). The European Social Model - pros and cons. Journal of Doctoral Research in Economics, III(4), 11-18.
World Bank (2014). Strengthening recovery in CentralandEasternEurope - EU 11 Regular Economic Report. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Feature%20Story/ECA/eu11-regular-economic-report-july-2014.pdf.
Ahmed, A. S., Neel, M., and Wang, D., 2013. Does Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Improve Accounting Quality? Preliminary Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30 (4), 1344-1372. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01193.x
Akerlof, G. A., 1970. The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3), 488-500. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Albu, C. N., and Albu, N., 2015. Introduction to the Special Issue on Accounting Academia in CentralandEastern
Union Politics . 2 nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2005. “The Re-Emergence of Weberian Public Administration after the Fall of New Public Management: The CentralandEasternEuropean Perspective.” Handuskultuur 6, 94 – 108.
Erlandson, David A., Edward L. Harris, Barbara L. Skipper and Steven D. Allen. 1993. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hofmann, Herwig C. H. 2008. “Mapping the European Administrative Space.” West European Politics 31(4), 662 – 676
Purpose: Despite the importance of innovation, the full innovation potential of companies operating in the industrial sector of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) seems not to have been unlocked yet. Thus, the primary purpose of the study was to explore the key elements of company innovation policies applied on the way to successful innovation. Methodology: The study is based on qualitative methods. The aim of the study has been achieved through 24 semi-structured interviews conducted with senior management, project leaders, and R&D specialists employed at companies operating in the industrial sector in CEE. The time frame covers the period of the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017. Findings: Managing disruption consists of focusing on innovation development stage and following market imperatives by making the innovation try to address the market needs. Balancing portfolio requires considering product and process innovation jointly. Furthermore, 62% of the interviewees say that breakthrough innovation results ultimately from numerous incremental advancements. As far as policy integration is concerned, achieving competitive advantage through internal research is common amongst technological leaders, while market contenders turn to external cooperation. Moreover, incorporating CSV principles into the concept of innovation policy appears to be a necessity. Managing intangibilities comes down to patents. Research limitations: The research was burdened with such limitations as respondents experiencing time pressure and the use of only one source of information (the interviewees). Originality: Despite much general evidence, the study attempts to complement the rare qualitative studies on innovation in CEE. It was carried out as a response to the lack of an in-depth study covering such recurrent challenges in the field of company innovation policies as disruption, portfolio balancing, integration, intangibilities’ management, and play.