One of the most effective tools in e-learning is the Self-Assessment Tool (SAT) and research has shown that students need to accurately assess their own performance thus improving their learning. The study involved the design and development of a self-assessment tool based on the Revised Blooms taxonomy Framework. As a second step in investigating the effectiveness of the SAT, 1st year student of the BSC Educational Technology program from the VCILT, University of Mauritius were used as testing sample. At this stage the SAT was provided to only half of the sample who were randomly chosen and placed into a treatment group. The remaining half (Control Group) had the normal conditions on the E-learning platform. A semester exam was devised and administered to the whole sample to find out if there was a difference between the scores of both groups. Lastly a feedback form was given to only the treatment group to find out their views on the SAT. The results indicated a significant difference in scores between the treatment and the control groups when the Student’s Independent T-test was used. Group A percentage of passes were higher compared to Group B. Failures were recorded for both groups with an increased rate of failure for Group B compared to Group A. Moreover, most of the respondents’ feedbacks suggested that SAT was a useful guide with helpful feedbacks. The findings concluded that SAT was viewed more as a revision tool that allowed them to assess their own learning.
4. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education [Report]. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, Feb. 2007. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
5. Bell, A. (2009). Exploring Web 2.0: Second generation interactive tools - blogs, podcast, wikis, networking, virtual worlds, and more. Georgetown, TX: Katy Crossing Press.
6. Bernoff, J.; Pflaum, C.N.; Bowen, E. (2008, October 20). The growth of social technology adoption. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA
1. Adams, A. and Pike, A. (2008). Security issues within prison and health ODL programmers. Retrieved 10th April, 2012, from the website: http://wikieducator.org/images/a/ab/PID_461.pdf
2. Almaliotou-Kalabaliki, G. (2011). How a 30-year-old inmate studies from within prison. Republication from Ethnos.
3. Bateman, J. (2010). Virtual Campus (Project). In Workshop A5: e-Learning platforms and Distance learning. Budapest: European Conference on Prison Education. Retrieved 16th February, 2015, from the website: http://ec.europa.eu/education/tools
Jean Claude Byungura, Henrik Hansson, Kamuzinzi Masengesho and Thashmee Karunaratne
. Gevaert, R. (2012). A sustainable model for ICT capacity building in developing countries. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Large Installation System Administration: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques. 123-134. USENIX Association.
15. Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204.
16. Government of Rwanda (2013) Low no 71/2013 of 10/09/2013 establishing the
Chwen Jen Chen, Kee Man Chuah, Jimmy Tho and Chee Siong Teh
Franco, C. (2008). Using wiki-based peer-correction to develop writing skills of Brazilian EFL learners. In Novitas-Royal, 2(1), (pp. 49-59).
18. Engstrom, M.E. and Jewett, D. (2005). Collaborative learning the wiki way. In TechTrends, 49(6), (pp. 12-15).
19. Greener, S. (2009). Talking online: reflecting on online communication tools. In Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(3), (pp. 178-190).
20. Healey, D.; Hanson-Smith, E.; Hubbard, P.; Ioannou-Georgious, S.; Kessler, G. and Ware, P. (2011). TESOL technology standards: Description
Dimitra Gratsiouni, Maria Koutsouba, Foteini Venetsanou and Vasiliki Tyrovola
Dance, 7, 11-46. Retrieved from http://elepex.gr/images/stories/evdomostomos/antoniou_full_paper_1_gr.pdf
4. Bailey, H., Bachler, M., Buckingham Shum, S., Le Blanc, A., Popat, S., Rowley, A., & Turner, M. (2009). Dancing on the grid: using e-science tools to extend choreographic research. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367(1898), 2793-2806.
5. Bench, H. (2010). Screendance 2.0: Social dance-media. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 7(2), 183-214.
6. Berk, R. A. (2009
Stefanos Armakolas, Christos Panagiotakopoulos and Anthi Karatrantou
19. Coureau, S. (2000). The basic “tools” of the adult educator. Athens: Metaixmio.
20. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15 (1), 3-8.
21. Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. American Journal of Distance Education, 5 (1), 24-35.
22. Dobbs, R. R., Waid, C. A., & del Carmen, A. (2009
. Richter, A., & Koch, M. (2008). Functions of social networking services. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 87-98.
34. Rinaldo, S. B., Tapp, S., & Laverie, D. A. (2011). Learning by tweeting: Using Twitter as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 193-203. doi: 10.1177/0273475311410852.
35. Rowe, M., Bozalek, V., & Frantz, J. (2013). Using Google Drive to facilitate a blended approach to authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 594
Vasileios Kagklis, Anthi Karatrantou, Maria Tantoula, Chris T. Panagiotakopoulos and Vassilios S. Verykios
, A.J., & McDonald, M.P. (2011, October 26). Social Media versus Knowledge Management [Blog post]. Harvard Business Review Blog. Retrieved 10-1-2014 from http://blogs.hbr.org/2011/10/social-media-versus-knowledge/
9. Brindley, J.E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment. IRRODL, 10 (3). Retrieved 10-01-2014 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/675/1271
10. Cambria, E., & Hussain, A. (2012). Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications. Springer
Elsebeth Korsgaard Sorensen and Hanne Voldborg Andersen
). Using Digital Technologies to Strengthen Participation and Inclusion of Learners with Developmental and Attention Deficits. Proceeding at the 9th EDEN Research Workshop - EDENRW9, 4-6 October 2016, Oldenburg.
25. Sorensen, E. K., Andersen, H. V., & Grum, H. (2013). Intercultural dialogic eLearning: A tool for fostering shared understanding and sustainable competence development in practices of inclusion. Victoria, BC: AACE - Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
26. Sorensen, E. K. & Ó Murchú, D. (2004). Designing