's Press. Isaacs, S. (1988). Shining through . N.Y.: Harper & Row, Publishers. Karasik, V.I. & Gillespie, D. (2014). Discourse personality types. In The XXV annual international academic conference, language and culture , 20-22 October 2014, p. 23-29. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814055566 Korogoda, T.M. (2013). Strategies and tactics of communicative failure repair in the English conversational discourse . Thesis for the Candidate Degree in Philology, Speciality 10.02.04. – Germanic Languages. Kyiv National
The paper offers a study of speech interruptions on the basis of their communicative and pragmatic peculiarities. It provides a dynamic model of interruptions, where the development of the situation of interruption is revealed thanks to the dynamic character of speech interaction. The article presents the analysis of speech acts employed in the process of interruption. It also introduces a number of tactics of the interruption in terms of the cooperative and intrusive interruption strategy.
Marina Zheltukhina and Irina Zyubina
.A. &Buzinova, L.M. (2018). Linguopragmatic aspect of modern communication: Main political media speech strategies and tactics in the USA and the UK. In XLinguae , 11 (2), p. 639-654. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.51. Zvyagintsev, A.G. (2001). Sentenced by time: Russian and Soviet prosecutors: The 20 th century, 1937-1953. Moscow: Rossijskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. / Zvyagintsev A.G. Prigovoryonnyye vremenem: Rossiyskiye i sovetskiye prokurory: ХХ vek , 1937-1953 gg . Moskva: Rossijskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. / Звягинцев А.Г. Приговоренные временем