less than victory and defeat in future wars. Yet, while Bacevich (1995 : 60) saw that these professional limitations were not new, he pessimistically saw that “most of it is unavoidable”. This article takes a slightly more positive take on the issue. None of this may be new, but it is not impossible to reinvent this professional vocabulary. The aim of this paper is thus to contribute to this debate through the investigation of the most central institution of the military profession – war. In more concrete terms, this paper follows the observation made by Philip
Claes Wallenius, Charlotte Bäccman and Gerry Larsson
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18(4), 359-372.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bäccman, C., & Carlstedt, B. (2010). A construct validation of a profession-focused personality questionnaire (PQ) versus the
Rino Bandlitz Johansen, Monica Martinussen and Nils Kvilvang
Wong, L., & Johnson D.V. (2002). Serving the American people: A historical view of the Army profession. In D. M. Snider & G. L. Watkins (Eds.), The future of the army profession (pp. 537-538). USA: McGraw-Hill.
,” 2003, http://eureka.vu.edu.au/~nalin/IMSA2003GeorgievskiShardaPaper.pdf.
 T. Grant: “Unifying Planning and Control using an OODA-based Architecture,” Proceedings of SAICSIT 2005, p. 159-170.
 N. C. Goodwin: “Functionality and usability,” Communications of the ACM, March 1987, Vol. 30, No. 3, p. 229-233.
 J. Gulliksen, I. Boivie, J. Persson, A. Hektor, and L. Herulf: ”Making a difference - a survey of the usability profession in Sweden,” NordiCHI’04, October 23-27, 2004 Tampere, Finland, p. 207
). However, this study’s results demonstrated that the personality dimension Emotional stability was also correlated to the PSI. This may be explained by the military profession, which requires soldiers to be ‘emotionally fit’, exemplified through high-functioning emotion resilience systems in extreme working contexts that military personnel may encounter ( Algoe and Fredrickson 2011 ). In military staff work, it can mean contributing to decision processes that may directly affect the life and limb of others out in the field. Emotional stability has also been demonstrated
required in the military profession are well defined and well known. Students at the NDU are regularly tested, and physiological screening is part of student selection. Based on this, it is obvious that the participants of this study do exercise regularly and, thus, probably have goals or are at least able to assess them when asked to. A more common population is more likely to include people who do not train, at least not systematically, and thus their assessments of personal goals might not appear as consistent. It has been proposed that the dimensionality of goals in