DNA technology – when applied properly – provides the criminal justice system with a highly reliable identification method, which can be used to both convict and exonerate individuals. At the same time, however, this capacity of DNA technology undermines various forensic science identification techniques, including tool-mark, fingerprint, and bite-mark analysis, which the criminal justice system has routinely admitted as evidence for decades. See, in general , Paul C. Giannelli, Forensic Science: Under the Microscope 34 Ohio N. U. L. Rev
Edwin Henao-García, Jose Arias-Pérez and Nelson Lozada-Barahona
). Connecting gender identity, entrepreneurial training, role models and intentions. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship , 9 (1), 87–108. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-08-2016-0028
Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics , 16 (2), 95–111.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review , 33 (3), 114–135.
Guerrero, M., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2013