Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 items :

  • Central and Eastern Europe x
  • Jewish Studies x
Clear All
The Jewish Theological Seminary of Breslau and the Rabbinical College of Padua: A Comparison

socially integrated, with civil rights and aspirations to full political rights, often attending non-Jewish schools and educated in a non-Jewish culture, and sometimes living more in a non-Jewish milieu than in a Jewish one. The programmes and courses of the two institutes When it was founded, the Breslau Seminary, while maintaining its ties with tradition, seemed a more innovative institute than other schools, whose aim was to train rabbis, that were to be found in Central-Eastern Europe, first of all, for its potential students: it offered its services—as the

Open access
Ephraim Elimelech Urbach and the Movement for Torah’s Judaism 1966–1975—An Attempt to Reestablish the Breslau School in Israel

reasons connected to the more spiritual nature of Protestant Christianity and the more tolerant winds beginning to blow through Central and Western Europe as for reasons of apologetics. Nevertheless, they never sought to break down the barriers between Jews and Christians or to legitimize Christianity, because to them the supremacy of Judaism over Christianity was patently obvious. This trend was perpetuated among Orthodox rabbis in Germany and Bohemia all through the 19th century. – Ibid, pp. 193–194. Frankel and his school accepted the philosophic approach of

Open access
Rabbi Wolf Meisel’s Attempt to Establish a Midstream Judaism in Hungary, 1859-1867

sniping” from Löw against his more conservative colleagues and especially against Chief Rabbi Meisel of Pest. Michael K. Silber, “Budapest,” in The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe , ed. Gershon David Hundert, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008), vol. 1, p. 260-274. Löw’s review Ben-Chananja at times became an “arsenal of poisoned darts,” as Meisel’s biographer Meyer Kayserling called it. M. Kayserling, Dr. W. A. Meisel. Ein Lebens- und Zeitbild (Leipzig: Th. Grieben’s Verlag, 1891), p. 63. It is my intention to follow the press battle between the

Open access