Search Results

1 - 10 of 51 items :

  • Information Technology x
  • Project Management x
Clear All
An Automatic Method to Identify Citations to Journals in News Stories: A Case Study of UK Newspapers Citing Web of Science Journals

series of 39 surveys in the United States from 1996 through 2002 (showed that 42% of adults claimed to follow health news stories in the mass media ( Brodie, 2003 ). It is therefore reasonable for universities and scholars to seek press coverage to promote their work. From a scientometric perspective, newspaper coverage of research may also be used as evidence of the wider impact of the cited papers ( Fogg-Rogers, Grand, & Sardo, 2015 ) in addition to reflecting or causing (by publicity) its greater value within academia (e.g., Fanelli, 2013 ). It is important for

Open access
Methods and Practices for Institutional Benchmarking based on Research Impact and Competitiveness: A Case Study of ShanghaiTech University

.97% 76.91% 10.40% 0.54% 57.80% 148 40.7 4.14 Univ F 22.79% 72.08% 5.80% 0.29% 59.00% 178 28.2 2.81 Univ G 6.41% 68.13% 2.60% 0.11% 75.00% 58 17.9 1.98 Univ H 8.92% 69.39% 4.90% 0.00% 47.10% 88 29.2 2.55 Median 12.70% 70.90% 5.10% 0.34% 58.40% 97 27 2.63 Domestic Univ I 2.83% 61.61% 2.70% 0.00% 58.40% 53 15.9 1.84 Univ J 8.38% 55.39% 1.20% 0.00% 46.40% 56 12.6 1.35 Univ K 10.68% 50.51% 0.70% 0.03% 37.10% 57 9

Open access
A comparison of citation disciplinary structure in science between the G7 countries and the BRICS countries

countries. country Dist ( V Pi2013 , V Ci2013 ) Mean ( V Pi2013 ) Mean ( V Ci2013 ) United States 2.1 19.2 25.3 Russia 1.9 2.6 1.1 Brazil 1.3 2.5 1.5 India 1.2 3.6 2.4 China 1.0 14.8 13.8 United Kingdom 0.8 4.3 5.4 Japan 0.8 4.6 3.6 Germany 0.7 5.0 5.9 France 0.5 3.9 4.4 Italy 0.4 3.5 3.8 South Africa 0.4 0.6 0.4 Canada 0.3 2.9 3.2 Most G7 countries, with United States as an exception, have lower

Open access
Identification and Analysis of Multi-tasking Product Information Search Sessions with Query Logs

average consumers, we removed users who had too many sessions as belonging to businesses. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the users by the number of sessions. Figure 2 Distribution of users by number of sessions. The x -axis in Figure 2 is the number of sessions, and the y -axis shows the number of users who had a particular number of sessions. The secondary axis of y -axis shows the accumulative percentage of the users. We remove users who belong to the upper 2.5% (with more than 33 sessions), those who were likely to be shop owners rather

Open access
Document Type Profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and Country Level

, K., Adachi, J., Aoki, M., Masuda, T., Midorikawa, N., Tanimura, A., & Yamazaki, S. (1988). A comparison between the journals Nature and Science . Scientometrics, 13(3–4), 125–153. 10.1007/BF02017179 Kaneiwa K. Adachi J. Aoki M. Masuda T. Midorikawa N. Tanimura A. Yamazaki S. 1988 A comparison between the journals Nature and Science Scientometrics 13 3–4 125 153 Lewison, G. (2009). The percentage of reviews in research output: A simple measure of research esteem. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 25–37. 10.3152/095820209X410406 Lewison G. 2009 The

Open access
Redesigning the Model of Book Evaluation in the Polish Performance-based Research Funding System

://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2563-z Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. (2017). Narodowy Kongres Nauki. 19–20 września 2017 r. Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego 2017 Narodowy Kongres Nauki 19–20 września 2017 Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. (2018a). Ewaluacja jakości działalności naukowej – przewodnik. Retrieved from https://www.nauka.gov.pl/g2/oryginal/2018_08/6e48e5dd4e469616354f861c105e25f6.pdf Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego 2018a Ewaluacja jakości działalności naukowej – przewodnik Retrieved from https://www.nauka.gov.pl/g

Open access
An Accurate and Impartial Expert Assignment Method for Scientific Project Review

qualifications: (1) sufficient knowledge of the area/field under review; (2) enough front-line research experience to grasp the area/field’s key research points and frontiers to better guarantee an accurate understanding of the project proposal quality; and (3) few or no interest associations with the applicant to ensure the fairness of the project review. Interest association in this context refers to (a) the applicants’ academic association (e.g. same organization, co-authored/co-funded works, and other relationships/links, past or present) with the review experts, and (b

Open access
Gauging a Firm’s Innovative Performance Using an Integrated Structural Index for Patents

revision after review. References Banerjee, P.M., & Cole, B. M. (2010). Breadth-of-impact frontier: How firm-level decisions and selection environment dynamics generate boundary-spanning inventions. Technovation, 30(7), 411–419. 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.001 Banerjee P.M. Cole B. M. 2010 Breadth-of-impact frontier: How firm-level decisions and selection environment dynamics generate boundary-spanning inventions Technovation 30 7 411 419 Banks, M.G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds

Open access
Insight into the Disciplinary Structure of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology

co-occurrence matrix reports the relationship among different disciplines of N&N, as operationalized as WCs. The matrix construction is the basic work for analyzing disciplinary network structure and disciplinary cliques here. WCs provide an effective level of measurement of discipline for the study of interdisciplinary processes ( National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, 2005 ). The 225 or so WCs (the number is adjusted slightly over time) reflect sub-disciplines (e.g. Organic Chemistry). WCs have been selected to map science

Open access
Usage Count: A New Indicator to Detect Research Fronts

2011.59 detected by usage count and 2009.07 by times cited. Table 2 Recentness of the research fronts detected by times cited. Clusters No. of references Mean cited year No. of citing articles Recentness Emerging peptide nanomedicine 29 2008 54 2010.44 Pluripotent stem cell 25 2007 56 2008.89 Adipose-derived stem cell 25 2003 83 2010.14 Somatic cell 22 2008 52 2009.33 Mesenchymal stem cell 22 2003 55 2010.07 Induced pluripotent stem cell 22 2008 41 2009

Open access