Harraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991. Print.
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1999. Print.
Kaku, Michio. Physics of the Impossible. New York: Doubleday, 2008. Print.
Kiran, Asle H. and Peter-Paul Verbeek. “Trusting Our Selves to Technology.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23.3-4 (December 2010): 409-427. Print.
The following paper is devoted to the study of speech manipulation technologies in US political media discourse. A number of web-based articles have been taken under consideration for this study. They demonstrate the problem arising from the refugee flow in Europe and create a special “image” of the complicated European situation. It is helpful to see how the situation appears in the Internet media since this type of mass communication is most influential these days. While considering a large amount of media texts, a special speech manipulation technology has been revealed. This phenomenon demonstrates a distinct structure and close interrelations of purposefully selected elements. Going through a number of stages we can find out the technology of speech manipulation – a system of using the aggregate of speech manipulation instruments in order to purposefully guide the reality perception of the mass audience. The external level of the texts enables us to take a penetrating look at the internal intentions. This knowledge will help us not to confuse the migration crisis as it is and the migration crisis as it seems.
Studies 17.3 (Autumn 1991): 439-460.
Haraway, Donna . “A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, Technology and Socialist-feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” The Cybercultures Reader. Ed. David Bell and Barbara Kennedy. New York: Routledge, 2000. 292-324.
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1999.
Hillman, David and Ulrika Maude. The Body in Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2015. Jacobson, Brian R. “Ex Machina in the Garden
Interaction.” In Curator: The Museum Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 273-290.
De Lauretis, T. 1987. Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Díaz Cintas, J. 2005. “Audiovisual Translation Today - A Question of Accessibility for All.” In Translating Today vol 4, pp. 3-5.
Díaz Cintas, J., Orero P., and Remael, A. 2007. “Media For All: A Global Challenge.” In: Díaz Cintas, J., P. Orero and A. Remael (eds.) Media for All: Subtitling for the Deaf, Audio Description, and Sign
.23 (3 Jan. 2002). Web. 15 Jan. 2018.
Dick, Philip K. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? London: Millennium, 1999.
Galvan, Jill. “Entering the Posthuman Collective in Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep ?” Science Fiction Studies 24.3 (1997): 413-429.
Haraway, Donna. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and the Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” The Transgender Studies Reader . Ed. Susan Stryker and Stephen Whittle. New York: Routledge, 2006. 103-119.
Haraway, Donna. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene
Anders, A. “Foucault and the ‘Right to Life’: From Technologies of Normalization to Societies of Control.” Disability Studies Quarterly 33.3 (2013): 1-18.
Cadman, L. “Life and Death Decisions on Our Posthuman(ist) Times.” Antipode 41.1 (2009): 133-156.
Darke, P. “No Life Anyway: Pathologizing Disability on Film.” The Problem Body . Ed. by S. Chivers and N. Markotic. Ohio: The Ohio State U.P., 2010. 97-101.
Foucault, M. Abnormal: Lectures at the College De France 1974-1975. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Picador, 2003
Scenes of explicit teaching make only limited appearances in the university novel since World War II. While it would be easy – if cynical – to attribute this minimization to the devaluation of teaching in the modern university, the importance of teaching and learning to sympathetic characters (and their lack of importance to corrupted figures) suggests that this lack of focus on the classroom stems from something else. Indeed, university novels tend to be fairly conservative aesthetically, and the demands of traditional narrative make extended classroom scenes difficult if not impossible to manage. Because of these narrative demands, learning and teaching take on different forms in the university novel, creating stories in which education corresponds to the struggle of teachers and students with and against administrators and buildings – stories that, therefore, resemble Leo van Lier’s observation about how remembering our own educations as stories contradicts more bureaucratic visions of learning. This observation holds true whether one considers better-known works of university fiction such as David Lodge’s Campus Trilogy, Mary McCarthy’s The Groves of Academe, and Julie Schumacher’s Dear Committee Members or lesser-known works produced by micro-presses and writers who are enabled by current technologies to publish electronically.