Search Results

1 - 10 of 134 items :

  • "technology" x
  • Linguistics and Semiotics x
  • Applied Linguistics x
Clear All

References Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge. Bawden, D. (2008). Digital Literacy. SciTopics. Retrieved November 20, 2015, from Brem, S. & Boyes, A.. (2000). Using critical thinking to conduct effective searches of online resources. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7(7). David, J.L. (1994). Realizing the promise of technology: a policy perspective, In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform. The reality behind the promise

Works Cited Anderson, Lorin W., et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives . Longman, 2001. Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress. Multimodality, Learning and Communication . Routledge, 2016. Bloom, Benjamin. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals – Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain . Longman, 1956. Bower, Matt. “Deriving a Typology of Web 2.0 Learning Technologies.” British Journal of Educational Technology , vol. 47, no. 4, 2016, pp. 763-77. Buckingham, David

References Abdullah, M. R. T. L. et al. (2013). M-learning scaffolding model for undergraduate English language learning: Bridging formal and informal learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 217 - 233. Aharony, N. (2014). Library and information science students’perception of mlearning. Journal of librarianship and information science, 46(1), 48-61. Ally, M. (2009). Mobile Learning. Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training. Athabasca: AU Press. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A

References Anderson, Terry (2008). Theory and Practice of Online Learning . Canada: Athabasca University Press. Ally, Mohamed, Patrick Fahy (2002). Using students’ learning styles to provide support in distance education. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning . Madison. Bates, Tony (2005). Technology, E-learning and Distance Education . London: Routlege. Boling, Erica, Mary Hough, Hindi Krinsky, Hafiz Saleem, Maggie Stevens (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes online

in ExELL

References Abdelhalim, S. (2016). An Interpretive Inquiry into the Integration of the Information and Communication Technology Tools in TEFL at Egyptian Universities. Journal of Research in Curriculum, Instruction and Educational Technology , 2(4), 145-173 . Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education , 47(4), 373–398. Arnold, N. (2007). Technology-mediated learning 10 years later: Emphasizing pedagogical or


Based on thecurrentacademic activities, the dominance of American English in science culture, and on the hereto related suppression of the traditional scientific multilingualism, the article deliberates on the relevance of German in the international knowledge industry. Given the increased demand for the MINT-subjects (Mathematics, Informatics, Natural sciences and Technology) and the exclusive promotion of English as (the only) science language in the globalization tide, fact that is mirrored in the altered publication practice, one must necessarily ask, wheth er there is still a future ahead for German as a science language or for German in science.


Preface International Seminar on Linguistics (ISOL) is an international platform for linguist to share and disseminate their thought and research finding. ISOL was been initiated on 2013 and regularly held biannual by Linguistics Society of Indonesia chapter Universitas Andalas (Unand) in collaboration with Linguistic Graduate Program of Universitas Andalas and Linguistic Society of Indonesia. The current conference bring the issues on “Language in Disruptive Technology“ The rapid development of technology has led to the borderless community which

Language in Disruptive Technology

Proceeding of The 4th International Seminar on Linguistics (ISOL-4) Language in Disruptive Technology July 10-11, 2019 Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia Editor Handoko Gusdi Sastra STEERING COMMITTEE Chief of Committee Gusdi Sastra, M.Hum., Ph.D. Co-Chief Dr. Ike Revita, M.Hum. Treasurer Dra. Noviatri, M.Hum Editor Handoko, S.S, M.Hum Steering Committee Prof. Dr. Tafdil Husni, MBA. (Rectore of Universitas Andalas) Dr. Ing. Uyung Gatot (Head of Institute of Research and Community Service) Dr. Hasanuddin

development in technology makes those tools are not suitable for the present farming method, as more practical and modern appliances have replaced them. First is lapiak angkuik that was previously used to carry the harvested rice to collected place or ungguak in which the interpretation of lapiak as ‘mat’ that is made from special kind of pandanuses leave or Suji leaves, while angkuik means ‘to lift or to carry’. When the words are combined lapiak angkuik means as the mat to lift or a mat to carry. lapiak angkuik cannot be used for other purpose like any other mats