Nestor Shpak, Nazar Podolchak, Veronika Karkovska and Wlodzimierz Sroka
corporate learning, as they know that they need to increase their competence to break through and survive in times of a sudden crisis or a global problem.
The employees of Generation X need to receive strategic information from the administration for explaining the objectives of the activity, involving them in the process of making managerial decisions regarding the prospects for the development of the structure. They make up the most dynamic group of public servants, but if they are not satisfied with the motivational programs, they will seek new opportunities even
In the Slovak Republic, a number of internal ministerial advisory bodies, intended to provide high-quality analyses and evidence based policy making for national policy, have been established over the last two years. We have studied how the rational technocratic model of scientific policy advice as a specific mode of governing, acted out through these new institutional sites of expertise, survives in a highly politicised environment of the Slovak public administration. Central to our study was the reconstruction of an intersubjective account central to the work of organising on which the analytical centres and their staff, as well as their patrons, participate. Complementary to this, we focused on intersubjectively shared elements of the analysts’ community and subculture within the dominant CEE public administration culture. The vision of governing with expertise shared by analytical centres rests on the principles of transparency, orientation on professional merit (primarily econometric, analytical skills), voluntarism, conflict avoidance, political opportunism and institutional autonomy. Analytical centres identify themselves as a distinct professional group – in fact, they form a distinct organisational subculture around traits such as demographic characteristics (predominantly young males with economic or mathematical/IT background), symbols, hierarchies, working culture, humour, as well as artefacts. Analysts see their mission in the provision of impartial, objective analytical evidence for informed decision making, yet they negotiate the boundary between politics and expertise on a daily basis, and, as we found, in numerous aspects of analysts’ work politics cannot be entirely bracketed.
Aiello, F. & Pupo, V. (2012). Structural Funds and The Economic Divide in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34 (3), 403-418.
Andrulevičiūtė, V. (2015, September 21). Will Lithuania survive without EU structural funds? Delfi News. Retrieved from http://en.delfi.lt/lithuania/economy/will-lithuania-survive-without-eu-structural-funds.d?id=67941614
Balzaravičienė, S., & Pilinkienė, V. (2012). Comparison and Review of Competitiveness Indexes: Towards the EU policy. Economics and Management, 17 (1), 103