Environmental repercussion of subsidence reservoirs reclamation
Subsidence basins filled with water are being formed above exploitation fields also in woodland areas leading to changes in water relations simultaneously affecting creation of environmental islands characterized by higher biodiversity in comparison with adjacent areas.
Unfortunately, these types of water reservoirs from the legal point of view are considered mining damage and should thus be reclaimed. Reclamation usually consists in gravitational drainage and filling up with barren rock, appropriate relief forming and afforestation. So performed reclamation practices lead to negative effects both within the subsidence and in adjacent areas. The objective of this work was to determine the impact of reclamation based on filling subsidence with barren rock on changes in hydrology and biodiversity of nearby forest communities. For the purpose of the study two objects were selected: the existing water body and former water reservoir - at present filled with barren rock. Both are situated in Ślαskie voivodship (the territory of Mysłowice and Katowice). Within the two objects, hydrological studies at two sampling points in each of the objects and vegetation sampling were performed. The DCA of 12 transects (6 in each object) and statistical analyses of vegetation showed differences between two objects in species composition, especially due to higher abundance and coverage of invasive and expansive species in reclaimed areas. Chemical analyses showed high contamination of surface waters (by e.g. SO42-, Cl-, Na+) caused by waste deposition in barren rock and the negative effect of coal mine waters supplying the area of reclaimed reservoir.
użytkowaniu łąk [The occurrence of Poa pratensis-Festuca rubra community in terms of negligence in the use of meadows]. Annales UMCS. Sect. E. No. 70(1) p. 61–72.
U rban D., G rzywna A. 2003. Zbiorowiska łąkowe z klasy Molinio-Arrhenatheretea w dolinie Ochoży [Meadow plant communities from the Molinio-Arrhenatheretea in the Ochoża valley]. Annales UMCS. Sect. E. No. 58 p. 155–166.
V ander P utten W.H., M ortimer S.R., H edlund K., V an D ijk C., B rown V.K., L eps J. 2000. Plant speciesdiversity as a driver of early succession in abandoned
-thermal regionization of Lower Silesia). Zeszyty Naukowe WSR Wrocław, 5, Melioracja, 27: 1-15.
Szoszkiewicz K., Szoszkiewicz J., 1998. Ocena różnorodności gatunkowej pratocenoz na przykładzie wybranych zbiorowisk. (An assessment of speciesdiversity of meadow phytocoenoses based on selected communities). Prace Komitetu Naukowego Rolnictwa i Komitetu Nauk Leśnych PTPN, 85: 47-52.
Trąba Cz., Wolański P., Oklejewicz K., 2006. Różnorodność florystyczna wybranych zbiorowisk nieleśnych doliny Sanu (Floristic diversity of selected non
Justyna Hachoł, Mateusz Hämmerling and Elżbieta Bondar-Nowakowska
. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management. Vol. 7. Iss. 3 p. 247–260.
G rinberga L. 2010. Environmental factors influencing the speciesdiversity of macrophytes in middle-sized streams in Latvia. Hydrobiologia. No. 656 p. 233–241.
G rinberga L. 2011 Macrophyte species composition in streams of Latvia under different flow and substrate conditions. Estonian Journal of Ecology. Vol. 60. Iss. 3 p. 194–208.
H achoł J., B ondar -N owakowska E. 2016. Wielokryterialna ocena skutków regulacji rzek. W: Interdyscyplinarne zagadnienia w inżynierii i ochronie
’évaluation d’un projet de renaturation hydrologique [Bryophytes and bryocenoses at the Entraygues site (Var, France) as an evaluation tool for a hydrological renaturation project]. Ecologia mediterranea. Spec. iss. Vol. 37. Iss. 2 p. 45‒56.
H uston M. 1979. A general hypothesis of speciesdiversity. American Naturalist. Vol. 113. No. 1 p. 81–101.
H uston M. 1994. Biological diversity. The coexistence of species of changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. ISBN 0521369304 pp. 681.
J akobsson A., E riksson G. 2003. Trade-offs between