Search Results

1 - 10 of 46 items :

  • "management" x
  • Human Resources, Labor Practice, Job and Career x
  • Business Development, Change Management, Cooperation x
Clear All
On Social Knowledge and Its Empirical Investigation in Contemporary Organisations

References 1. Andriessen, D. G. (2008). Stuff or Love? How Metaphors Direct Our Efforts to Manage Knowledge in Organisations // Knowledge Management Research & Practice. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 5–12. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500169. 2. Balconi, M. (2002). Tacitness, Codification of Technological Knowledge and the Organisation of Industry // Research policy. Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 357–379. 3. Bell, D. (1999). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Special Anniversary Edition / with a New Foreword by the Author. – New

Open access
Management of Organizations: Systematic Research
Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai
Open access
Knowledge Sharing Limitations among Academia: Analytic Network Process Approach

References 1. Amayah, A. T. (2013). Determinants of Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organization // Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 454–471. doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2012-0369. 2. Al-Kurdi, O., El-Haddadeh, R., Eldabi, T. (2018). Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Review // Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 226–246. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2017-0129. 3. Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and

Open access
Principle Differences between B2B and B2C Marketing Communication Processes

. Vol. 192, pp. 148–153. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.026. 4. Garg, Sh. (2014). Designing and Managing Integrated Marketing Communication // International Journal of Enhanced Research in Management & Computer Applications. Vol. 3, Issue 12, pp. 30–35. 5. Iankova, S., Davies, I., Archer-Brown, C., Marder, B., Yau, A. (2018). A Comparison of Social Media Marketing between B2B, B2C and Mixed Business Models // Industrial Marketing Management, (in press). doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.001. 6. Kemp, E. A., Borders, A. L., Anaza, N. A., Johnston, W. J

Open access
Business, Government, Society and Science Interest in Co-Production by Relative Evaluation Using Google Trends

., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., et al. (2014). The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review // PLoS ONE. Vol. 9, No. 10. e109583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 14. Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment? // Public Management Review. Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 639–653. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927 15. Pestoff, V. (2014). Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production // Public Management Review. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 383

Open access
Exploring the Effect of Ambient Scent on Consumer Impulsive Buying Behaviour: Theoretical Insights

Implementation of Fast-Food Marketing Campaigns // Journal of Management and Marketing Research, Vol. 14, pp. 1–11. 12. Hirsch, A. R. (1990). Preliminary results of olfaction Nike Study, note dated November 16 distributed by the Smell and Taste Treatment and Research Foundation. Chicago, IL. 13. Hirsch, A. R. (1995). Effects of Ambient Odors on Slot–Machine Usage in a Las Vegas Casino // Psychology & Marketing. Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 585–594. doi: doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120703 14. Hulten, B. (2011). Sensory Marketing: The Multi-Sensory Brand-Experience Concept

Open access
Dividend Practices in Listed Companies: Study on the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh

Finance. Vol. 8(4), pp. 349–363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/15265940710777306 . 6. Allen, I. E., Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert Scales and Data Analyses // Quality Progress. Vol. 40(7), pp. 64–65. 7. Asquith, P., Mullins, D. W. (1983). The Impact of Initiating Dividend Payments on Shareholders’ Wealth // Journal of Business. Vol. 56(1), pp. 77–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/296187 . 8. Baker, H. K., Farrelly, G. E., Edelman, R. B. (1985). A Survey of Management Views on Dividend Policy // Financial Management. Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 78–84. 9

Open access
The Interplay of Religious Symbols and Cultural Values Theory in Advertising

. 227–246. doi: 10.2501/IJMR-2013-021. 41. Klein, N. (2010). No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. – Vintage: Picado, pp. 69–84. 42. Koziniets, R. V. (2002). Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man // Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 29, pp. 20–38. doi: 10.1086/339919. 43. Lee, S., Lovelace, K. J., Manz, C. C. (2014). Serving with Spirit: An Integrative Model of Workplace Spirituality within Service Organizations // Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 45–64. doi: 10

Open access
Possible Impact of Facebook’s Libra on Volatility of Bitcoin: Evidence from Initial Coin Offer Funding Data

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Libra on volatility of Bitcoin using the classical framework of C. G. Lamoureux and W. D. Lastrapes (1990). ARCH and GARCH effects disappear when lagged ICO funding size is included in the variance equation. A negative association between volatility and funding size and the disappearance of volatility persistence (long-term volatility effect) suggest that Libra, as a dominant new currency, is likely to stabilize the cryptocurrency market and enhance potential for currency diversification. Furthermore, it is revealed that the stability cannot be ensured merely by backing decentralized blockchain instruments, such as Bitcoin, with bank deposits, government securities or exchange rate.

Open access
Systemic Improvement of Management: Case Analysis of a Company Evaluating Quality Costs

Factors Effects on Cost of Quality // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 26, No. 7, p. 685-698. doi: 10.1108/02656710910975750. 4. Borut, R., Alic, M. (2010). Capitalising on ISO 9001 Benefits for Strategic Results // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 27, No. 7, p. 756-778. doi: 10.1108/02656711011062372. 5. British Standard (1992). Internet access: <https// Guide-to-the-Economics-of-Quality-Part-1- Process-Cost-Model> [accessed November 10, 2016]. 6. Bushell, S

Open access