innovation efficiency , „Research Policy”, Volume 42, Issues 6–7, July–August.
Czarniawska B. (2010), Trochę inna teoria organizacji: Organizowanie jako konstrukcja sieci działań , Wydawnictwo Poltext, Warszawa.
DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. (1983), The Iron Cage Revisited. Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields , „American Sociological Review”, 48.
Eggertsson T. (2013), Quick guide to New Institutional Economics , „Journal of Comparative Economics”, 41.
Elving W.J.L. (2005), The role of communication in
 Afuah, A. (1998). Responding To Structural Industry Changes: A Technological Evolution Perspective. Oxford University Press, Usa, Vol.6, Issue 1, pp. 183-202.
 Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2009). Organizational Emotional Capability, Product And Process Innovation, And Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Journal Of Engineering And Technology Management , Vol. 26(3), pp. 103–130.
 Barczak, G. (1995). New Product Strategy, Structure, Process And Performance In The Telecommunications Industry. Journal Of
 Baird, K., Hu, K.J. and Reeve, R. (2011). The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31 (7), 789 - 814.
 Baldwin, J. and Lin, Z. (2002). Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Research Policy , 31 (1),.1–18.
 Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. and Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47 (8), 1323 - 1339
Zuzanna Ostraszewska, Agnieszka Tylec and Sergii Vasylyk
European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard, 2016 , available at http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_pl .
European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard. Methodology report, 2016 , available at http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_pl .
European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard. Methodology report , 2018, available at https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/30081
Kamińska, A., 2017. Kształtowanie potencjału innowacyjnego
Rasa Aleknavičiūtė, Viktorija Skvarciany and Simona Survilaitė
Intellectual Capital, 10(4), 573-587.
Chen S. (2003). Valuing intellectual capital using game theory. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), 191-201.
Coe, D. T., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. W. (2009). International R&D spillovers and institutions. European Economic Review, 53(7), 723-741.
Curado, Henriques ir Bontis. (2011). Intellectual capital disclosure payback. Management Decision, 49(7), 1080-1098
Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study
 Adams, R., Bessant, J. and Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Review , 8 (1), 21-47.
 Albury, D. (2005). Fostering Innovation in Public Services. Public Money and Management, 25 (1), 51-56.
 Alpkan, L., Cagri Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G. and Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48(5), 732-755.
 Armstrong, C., Flood, P. C
– recent theoretical advances and future challenges. W: R. Capello, P. Nijkamp (red.). Handbook of regional growth and development theories . Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848445987 .
6. Dargan, L., Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48 , 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x .
7. Furmankiewicz, M. (2002). Funkcjonalno-przestrzenne sieci współpracy samorządów lokalnych. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 1 (8), 5-24.
8. Furmankiewicz, M., Stefańska, J. (2010). Partnerstwa
Tuan-anh Tran, Rajab Ghabour, My Nguyen and Miklós Daróczi
, 2(1), 56–74, doi: http ://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216.
Choomlucksana, J., Ongsaranakorn, M., Suksabai, P., 2015. Improving the Productivity of Sheet Metal Stamping Subassembly Area Using the Application of Lean Manufacturing Principles. Procedia Manufacturing, 2(February), 102–107, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.090.
CIDB MALAYSIA, 2008. Malaysia Report . The 14th Asia Construct Conference, 1, 13–26.
Edison, H. et al., 2018. Lean Internal Startups for Software Product Innovation in Large Companies: Enablers and Inhibitors . Journal of
Budget transparency innovations bring new extent and forms of transparency. The aim of the article is to explore the diffusion of budget explorers, that is, a budget transparency innovation extremely popular in the Czech Republic, and to evaluate their impact on voluntary budget information disclosed.
Careful mapping of the diffusion using a survey of budget explores in 72 former Czech district towns and media analysis shows that the key success factor was its convenience for politicians, as it is attractive, easy to implement and up-to-date demonstration of their transparency. Budget explorers are nowadays a standard extension to accounting software, and their usage is evaluated in several government transparency competitions.
The major benefit of the budget explorers is that they made for the first time publicly available detailed public financial information, changed the standard of best practice and drew some public attention. At the same time, they, unfortunately, narrowed the scope of the budget transparency debate by omitting the importance of the draft budget and introduction of performance measurement.
The research aims to identify a modern Business Process Management solution to simulate integrated coordination mechanisms with impact on organization’s innovation. From a scientific and socio-economic perspective, the article is aligned with the European innovation trend that supports organizations' preoccupation to introduce innovation and upgrading processes, technologies and business models. The issues that the author has identified and sought to find answers are to identify that mild method of Business Process Management that can be correlated with the dimensions of organizational innovation in areas such as: the organization's infrastructure, partnership between business members, innovation "inside". The second issue is to limit current approaches by analyzing the current state of knowledge. The research has been included within the boundaries of modeling and simulation of business process flows with impact on organizational innovation vectors. Thus, the paper proposes and presents a set of integrated processes of collaboration between the organization and the business environment using Business Process Management as an integrated coordination mechanism of the organization's innovation