Lukas Schrott, Martin Gächter and Engelbert Theurl
Alkire, S. and Santos, E. (2010). Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries, University of Oxford, OPHI Working Paper No. 38.
Bahattacharya, N. and Mahalanobis, B. (1967). Regional Disparities in Household Income in India. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 143-161.
Bagolin, I. (2004). Human Development Index (HDI) - A poor representation to Human Development Approach. University of Rio Grande do Sul, PUCRS, Brazil.
Becker, G. S. et al
. (eds). Ed. FAPA. Warszaw.
4. EUROSTAT. 2019. Online. [Cited 12. 05. 2019]. Available at: < http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/refreshTableAction.do;jsessionid=9ea7d07d30db8bad194c13fb44629ac38aa1b66697b5.e34MbxeSaxaSc40LbNiMbxeNb34Ke0?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tsdpc100&language=en >.
5. KARACZUN, Z., KASSEMBERG, A., OWCZAREK, D. 2015. Governance of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). National case study–Poland. Manuscript.
6. KARLSSON, I., RYDÉN, L., SEPP, K. 2013. Introduction. In: Rural Development and Land Use. Uppsala University, Baltic
This article aims to describe the development process of superior responsibility doctrine at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Superior responsibility is contained in all Statutes of ad hoc tribunals and also the Rome Statute. However, the case of ECCC is distinctive for its special structure and applicable law. As such, the ECCC is being often called ‘hybrid’, court. This Article aims to analyse travaux préparatoires to the ECCC Statute and ECCC Statute itself when it comes to superior responsibility. This analysis will be followed by the ECCC case law. In 2019, the closure of ECCC is anticipated. As such, the first complex analysis on superior responsibility and its applicability by the ECCC is appropriate and can be used as guidance for other already established or future hybrid tribunals. To some extent, the findings can also be used for the application of superior responsibility by the ICC.
1. BUČEK, M. et al. 2010. Regionalna ekonomia a politika. EU: Bratislava, 2010. ISBN 978-80-8078-362-4.
2. CIAIAN, P. - SWINNEN, J. 2006. Land market Imperfections and agricultural policy impacts in the new EU member states: a partial equilibrium analysis. In: American journal of agricultural economics, Oxford, 2006, Volume 88, Issue 4, p. 799-815. ISSN 1467-8276.
3. CISSE, H. 2015. Improving delivery in development: the role of voice, social contract and accountability. In: The World Bankpolicy
1. EROKHIN, V. et al. (2014): Contemporary Issues of Sustainable Rural Development: International Approaches and Experiences of Eastern Europe and Russia : monograph. - Stavropol: AGRUS of Stavropol State Agrarian University, 172 p.
2. EROKHIN, V. (2013): Review of Law Obligations of State Support of Agriculture in EU, CIS and Russia. Agrarian Law VII - Selected Aspects of Agrarian Law: International Scientific Conference of Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovak Republic. - Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture, pp. 17-23.
The New Partnership for Africa’s Development is the latest in a long line of initiatives or framework intended by African leaders to place African continent on a path of growth and sustainable development. The development challenges that face Africa are enormous and varied. Th e crisis of political instability, bad governance, lack of peace and security, poverty and diseases like HIV/AIDs. NEPAD recognized peace and security as condition for good governance and sustainable development. Therefore, in absence of peace and security, democracy and good governance cannot strive and where there is no good governance, we cannot witness sustainable development. This paper argues that peace and security has been elusive in much of Africa. The failure of the Organisation of African Unity to ensure peace and security in Africa and to address Africa’s post-cold war legion of challenges, the successor organisation, the African Union and its attendant development programme, the NEPAD were established. The first issue which is critical to NEPAD is, solving armed conflict and civil unrest on the continent. Currently, twenty percent of the people of Africa are living in condition of conflict. These conditions cause terrible suffering and hold back economic development in the affected countries. The extent of conflict is so great that the whole continent is affected and this creates a major barrier to inward investment. On the resolution, NEPAD is in a position to make considerable progress. It was learnt in Sierra Lone that with concentrated international eff ort, conflict can be successfully ended and institutions of a properly functioning state can begin to be rebuilt. The paper therefore examines the origin of the NEPAD, NEPAD and challenges of peace and security in Africa and involvement of AU/NEPAD in Darfur and Cote D’Ivoire crises. It further discusses the AU/NEPAD conflict mechanisms for conflict prevention, management and resolution and draw conclusion.
, vol. 111(2), pp. 793–828.
DUBNER, Stephen. What Are the Secrets of the German Economy — and Should We Steal Them? [online]. Available at: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/secrets-german-economy-steal/ Accessed: 14.06.2019
DUTT, Pawan, FERRARO, Simona, CHOCHIA, Archil, MULJAR, Ramona. Using Patent Development, Education Policy and Research and Development Expenditure Policy to Understand Differences between Countries: The Case of Estonia and Finland. Baltic Journal of European Studies , 2018, 8 (1), pp. 123–153.
Estonian Patent Office
Balogh, T. (1963). Unequal Partners, 1-2. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barro, J. B. (1998). Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. Cambridge: MIT Press Books.
Bartha, Z., Gubik, S.A., Tóthné Szita, K. (2013). Intézményi megoldások, fejlodési modellek (Institutional solutions, development models). Miskolc: GNR Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Bt.
Bhagwati, J. (1958). Immiserizing Growth: A Geometrical Note. The Review of Economic Studies, 25(3), 201
Countries in the Years 2000–2013. In Economics and Sociology , vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 66–81. DOI: 10.14254/2071–789X.2016/9–4/4.
4. COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 808/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
5. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development