Kiczales G., Lamping J., Menhdhekar A., Maeda C., Lopes C., Loingtier J.-M., Irwin J., 1997. Aspect-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), LNCS 1241, pages 220-242, Springer-Verlag.
Laddad, R, 2003. AspectJ in Action: Practical Aspect-Oriented Programming. Manning.
Beck K., 2002. Test Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley.
Loughran S., Hatcher E., 2007. Ant in Action, 2nd
Sandro Bolanos, Rubén González Crespo, Jordán Pascual Espada, Vicente García-Díaz and Jānis Osis
 J. Osis and E. Asnina. “Is Modeling a Treatment for the Weakness of Software Engineering?” in Model-Driven Domain Analysis and Software Development: Architectures and Functions . IGI Global, New York, USA, pp. 1–14, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-874-2.ch001
 P. Naur and B. Randell, Software engineering: Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO science committee , Scientific Affairs Division , NATO , Garmisch, Germany, November, 1968.
 S. McConnell, Rapid Development , Microsoft Press, 1996.
Agile Manifesto,” Aug. 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.drdobbs.com/open-source/the-agile-manifesto/184414755 . [Accessed: 25 April 2018].
 B. Volfson. Gibkie Metodologii Razrabotki . Piter, 2012. s. 112.
 B. Meyer. Agile! The Good, the Hype and the Ugly . Springer, 2014. 170 p.
 M. Cohn. Succeeding With Agile: Software Development Using Scrum . Addison-Wesley, 2009. 504 p.
 J. Sutherland. Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time . Crown Business Publications, 2014. 256 p.
 K. S. Rubin
Cusumano, M., MacCormack, A., Kemerer, C. F. , et al. Software Development Worldwide: The State of the Practice. IEEE Software , 2003, vol. 20, N 6. p. 28-34.
Gumm, D. C. Distribution Dimensions in Software Development Projects: A Taxonomy. IEEE Software , 2006, vol. 23, N 5. p. 45-51.
Meyer, B. The Unspoken Revolution in Software Engineering. Computer , 2006, vol. 39, N 1. p. 124, 121-123.
Prikladnicki, R., Audy, J. L. N. and Shull, F
This paper describes an alternative way of assessing journals considering a broader perspective of its impact. The Area-based connectedness (ABC) to society of journals applied here contributes to the assessment of the dissemination task of journals but with more data it may also contribute to the assessment of other missions.
The ABC approach assesses the performance of research actors, in this case journals, considering the characteristics of the research areas in which they are active. Each paper in a journal inherits the characteristics of its area. These areas are defined by a publication-based classification. The characteristics of areas relate to 5 dimensions of connectedness to society (news, policy, industrial R&D, technology and local interest) and are calculated by bibliometric indicators and social media metrics.
In the paper, I illustrate the approach by showing the results for a few journals. They illustrate the diverse profiles that journals may have. We are able to provide a profile for each journal in the Web of Science database. The profiles we present show an appropriate view on the journals’ societal connectedness.
The classification I apply to perform the analyses is a CWTS in house classification based on Web of Science data. As such the application depends on the (updates of) that system. The classification is available at www.leidenranking.com
The dimensions of connectedness discussed in this paper relate to the dissemination task of journals but further development of this method may provide more options to monitor the tasks/mission of journals.
The ABC approach is a unique way to assess performance or impact of research actors considering the characteristics of the areas in which output is published and as such less prone to manipulation or gaming.
At present, China is a front-runner in the number of scientific outputs, but the quality remains to be improved. In order to respond to international competition and to satisfy domestic development needs, the orientation of China’s science and technology evaluation has changed from encouraging international publications to pursuing excellence and encouraging science and technology for promoting development. One of the policies is the introduction of international experts in science and technology evaluation when conditions permit. For instance
evaluations for researchers or institutions at different career or development stages. Typical reasons for this type of evaluations include promotion and funding. Universities and scientific institutions may have a legal obligation to perform regular assessments of their research work.
Types of research or performance: basic or applied research in the natural sciences, basic or applied research in the social sciences and humanities, contributing to interdisciplinary research, advancing clinical medicine, patenting, technique & product development, policy research, social
University benchmarking and assessment has long been a heated area of research and practices with many approaches and rankings. However, there exist different types of universities with different missions and sizes, resulting in varied emphases on research, teaching, or industrial/regional development. Even within research-oriented universities, some are more focused on basic research, while other ones aim more at applications. Most general ranking systems cannot show the degree to which ShanghaiTech University (hereafter: ShanghaiTech) as a