Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 items :

  • "correlation" x
  • Selected Philosophical Movements x
Clear All
Toward a Causal Interpretation of the Common Factor Model

California Press. van der Maas, Han. L. J.; Dolan, Conor. V.; Grasman, Raoul. P.; Wicherts, Jelte. M.; Huizenga, Hilde. M.; and Raijmakers, Maartje. E. 2006. A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review 113: 842–61. Spearman, Charles. 1904. ‘General Intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology 15: 201–92. van Bork, Riet; Rhemtulla, Mijke; and Borsboom, Denny. 2015. Latent variable and network model implications for partial correlation

Open access
Causal Concepts Guiding Model Specification in Systems Biology

: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Opgen-Rhein, Rainer; and Strimmer, Korbinian. 2007. From correlation to causation networks: a simple approximate learning algorithm and its application to high-dimensional plant gene expression data. BMC Systems Biology 1. < >. Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference . New York: Cambridge University Press. Peter, Isabelle S.; and Davidson, Eric H. 2015. Genomic Control Process: Development and Evolution . New

Open access
The Loss of the Great Outdoors: Neither Correlationist Gem nor Kantian Catastrophe


This article concerns Quentin Meillassoux’s claim that Kant’s revolution is responsible for philosophy’s catastrophic loss of the ‘great outdoors’, of our knowledge of things as they are in themselves. I argue that Meillassoux’s critique of Kant’s ‘weak’ correlationism and his defence of ‘strong’ correlationism are predicated on a fallacious argument (termed ‘the Gem’ by David Stove) and the traditional, but in my view mistaken, metaphysical interpretation of Kant’s transcendental distinction. I draw on Henry Allison’s interpretation of Kant’s idealism to argue that when Kant’s transcendental distinction is understood epistemologically we can avoid the fallacious reasoning underpinning Meillassoux’s argument, and at the very least attenuate his concerns about the ‘Kantian catastrophe’.

Open access
Transcendental Phenomenology and Unobservable Entities

of Responsibility, Cham: Springer. Vallor, Shannon (2009): “The Pregnancy of the Real: A Phenomenological Defense of Experimental Realism,” Inquiry 52, 1, 1-25. Wiltsche, Harald (2017): “Science, Realism and Correlationism. A Phenomenological Critique of Meillasoux’ Argument from Ancestrality,” European Journal of Philosophy 25, 3, 808-832. Wiltsche, Harald (2012): “What is Wrong with Husserl’s Scientific Anti-Realism?” Inquiry 55, 2, 105-130.

Open access