Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 items :

  • Foreign Policy x
Clear All
Stability, Ambiguity and Change in the Discourses of NATO allies in the Black Sea region: The Cases of Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey

). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Romania, 2017. Romania-NATO. [online] Available at: https://www.mae.ro/en/node/2066?page=2 (Accessed February 2017). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, 2017. Turkey’s relations with NATO. [online] Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/nato.en.mfa (Accessed March 2017). Mitrovici, E. and Diac, M., 2016. The Bulgarian Prime Minister opposes to the Black Sea flotilla. President Iohannis insists it is a good idea. România Liberă, 16 June [online]. Available at: http

Open access
Estonia’s comprehensive approach to national defence: origins and dilemmas

Europeanization - Case of Finland and Estonia. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 16 (1), 5−23. Markus, R.; Veebel, V.; Lvova, O. (2018). Crisis Management for Public Sector during the European Financial Crisis: Lessons of Estonia in 2008-2011. Proceedings of the 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2017 - Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth 2017-January, 1386-1393 McDonnell, J.P. (2009): National Strategic Planning: Linking DIMEFIL/PMESII to a Theory of Victory. Joint

Open access
Discursive and Institutional Management of Refugees and Their Crisis in Lithuania

Rumuniją’ [Euro got Lithuania naked: in terms of medium wage we are better only than Hungary Bulgaria and Romania] at http://www.15min.lt/verslas/naujiena/finansai/eurasapnuogino-lietuva-vidutine-alga-es-lenkiame-tik-vengrijabulgarija-ir-rumunija-662-487836 Mazuronis, Valentinas. 2015. ‘Laikinoji apsauga - planas migrantų krizei spręsti’ [Subsidiary protection - a plan for solution of the migrant crisis] at http://www.delfi.lt/news/ringas/politics/v-mazuronislaikinoji-apsauga-planas-pabegeliu-krizeispresti.d?id=68929838 O’Manique, Colleen

Open access
Does Latvia Matter in Regional Geopolitics?

Estonia. Romanian Review on Political Geography/Revista Româna Geografie Politica, 14(1), pp. 45-50. JOENNIEMI, P., 2012. Turning into a Sovereign Actor? Probing the EU Through the Lens of Neighborhood. Geopolitics, 17(1), pp. 25-46. KARA-MURZA, V.V., 2015. Russia and the Baltics: Once Friend, Now Foe. World Affairs, 2015(January/February),. KAZHARSKI, A. and MAKARYCHEV, A., 2015. Suturing the Neighborhood? Russia and the EU in Conflictual Intersubjectivity. Problems of Post-Communism, 62(6), pp. 328. KESA, K., 2011. Latvian and

Open access
How Russian Soft Power Fails in Estonia: Or, Why the Russophone Minorities Remain Quiescent

References Amnesty International (2006), Linguistic Minorities in Estonia: Discrimination Must End, available at http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR51/002/2006/en, (last accessed on 4 November 2015). Berg, E. & Boman, J. (eds) (2005), Crossborder Cooperation in Focus: What are the Lessons to be Learned in the Estonian-Russian and Romanian-Moldovan Borderland? (Tartu, Tartu University Press). Brüggemann, K. & Kasekamp, A. (2008), ‘The Politics of History and the War of Memories in Estonia’, Nationalities

Open access
Researching Baltic security challenges after the annexation of Crimea

_Stoicescu_-_The_Russian_Threat_to_Security_in_the_Baltic_Sea_Region.pdf Thompson, L.B. (2016). Why the Baltic States are where nuclear war is most likely to begin. The National Interests. Available from: http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/why-thebaltic-states-are-where-nuclear-war-most-likely-17044?page=2 Veebel, V. (2018a). (Un)justified expectations on nuclear deterrence of non-nuclear NATO members: the case of Estonia and Latvia?, Defense & Security Analysis, 34:3, 291-309. Veebel, V. (2018b). Russia’s Neo-Imperial dependence model: experiences of former Soviet republics. Romanian Journal of Political Science, 17 (1

Open access
The “New Cold Warriors” and the “Pragmatics”: The Differences in Foreign Policy Attitudes towards Russia and the Eastern Partnership States among the NATO Member States from Central and South-Eastern Europe

Abstract

The post-communist NATO member states from Central and South-Eastern Europe (CSEE) comprise a group of 11 NATO/EU member states, from the Baltic to the Adriatic and Black Sea. The twelfth and thirteenth NATO member states from the region are Albania and Montenegro. The afore-mentioned NATO/EU member states have mostly shown a similar stance towards the Eastern Partnership Policy. However, since 2014, these states have shown more diverse stances, albeit declaratively supporting the anti-Russian sanctions. Due to the difference in stances towards Russia, the “New Cold Warriors” (Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania) and the “Pragmatics” (Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia and Bulgaria), will maintain a mostly common course towards Russia and the Eastern Partnership states because they have to. The Czech Republic, although hosting a part of the US anti-ballistic missile shield, is not a genuine “New Cold Warrior”, while in 2016 Croatia effectively became one.

Open access
Application of Legal Entities to the European Court of Human Rights: a Significant Disadvantage as the Condition of Admissibility

and Shtekel vs. Ukraine, 5 August [online]. Available at: www.hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-104685&filename=001-104685.pdf . (accessed 10 January 2018). ECHR, 2011. Finger vs. Bulgaria, 10 August [online]. Available at: www.hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{“itemid”:[“001-104698”] } (accessed 10 January 2018). ECHR, 2011. Giuran vs. Romania, 21 June [online]. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%20 (accessed 11 January 2018). ECHR, 2011. Luchaninova vs. Ukraine, 9 June [online]. Available at: https

Open access
Political Criteria vs. Political Conditionality: Comparative analysis of Slovenian and Croatian European Union accession processes

, and Minority Protection in Central and Eastern Europe.’ Paper presented at the 5th Convention of the Central and East European International Studies Association, Tartu, 25-27 June. Schwellnus, G., 2006. ‘Double standards? Minority protection as a condition for membership.’ In Sjursen, H. (ed.) Questioning EU enlargement - Europe in search of identity, (New York: Routledge), pp. 186-202. Sedelmeier, U., 2014. ‘Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.’ JCMS 52

Open access
Energy Charter Treaty – Standards of Investment Protection

at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw4228.pdf [accessed 20 December 2017]. Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A, S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20. Award 11 December 2013. Available at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw3036.pdf [accessed 20 December 2017]. Joseph Charles Lemire v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/18. Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability 14 January 2010. Available at: https

Open access