mapping of the multifunctional landscapestructure.
3.2 Conceptual deficits
Despite its widespread appreciation, highly impressive research activities worldwide, work on the operationalisation of the approach and the quantification of ecosystem processes, functions and services ( Costanza/de Groot/Braat et al. 2017 ), the concept has a number of limitations. These go beyond the often-voiced criticism of the anthropocentric nature of the ecosystem services concept, and need to be part of the future research agenda. Such limitations include the large variety of
architects and planners of the time treated the city as a tabula rasa ( Barris 2001 ). The only obstacle to dramatic change was the landscapestructure of the area and the waters flowing there. The form was monumental with a large avenue leading to the Palace of the Republic on Uranus Hill. Other buildings were adjusted to this scale separating the ‘ideal’ city from what was hidden behind in its courtyards. Spatial organisation ( Tab. 6 ) was dedicated to an elitist audience with rescaled elements of large interiors designed only for mass events ( Gospodini 2004
Wiktor Głowacki, Janusz Komenda, Magdalena Zalasińska, Ilona Morawska and František Imrich
to affect the visibility of the monument should be considered individually with particular attention paid not only to the protection of the actual monument, but also to the preservation of the values of the surrounding area. The third paragraph concerns landscape harmonisation. As an outstanding value of the preserved natural and cultural space, landscape is protected against destruction. For this reason, no new “competitive” landmarks should be built in the vicinity of cultural or historic landmarks. The subsequent description of landscapestructure is to a large