. (1995), Policing the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aspinwal, M. & Schneider, G. (2003), ‘Same menu, separate tables: the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration,’ European Journal of Political Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00526
Balzacq, T., ed. (2009), The External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs: Governance, Norms, Security, Basingstoke: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230233911
Bickerton, C. J. (2010
): European economic and monetary integration and the optimum currency area theory, European Economy, Economic Papers No. 302, February 2008, European Commission, Brussels: available at http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication12081_en.pdf (18 October 2017).
Schuman, Robert (1950): Declaration of 9th May 1950, in: European Issue No. 204, 10th May 2011, Fondation Robert Schuman: available at https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/doc/questions-d-europe/qe-204-en.pdf (17 October 2017).
Szemlér, Tamás (2009): Future Prospects of the European
Acharya, A. (2006), ‘Europe and Asia. Reflections on a tale of two regionalisms,’ in B. Fort & D. Webber (eds.) Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence and Divergence, London: Routledge, pp. 312-321.
Albertini, M. (1999), “L’unificazione europea e il potere costituente”, in Nazionalismo e Federalismo, Bologna: Il Mulino.
Bieber, R. (2009), ‘The Lissabon-Urteil: an association of sovereign states,’ European Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 395
Adler-Nissen, R. (2009), ‘Behind the scenes of differentiated integration: Circumventing national opt-outs in justice and home affairs,’ Journal of European Public Policy , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453239
Agreement… (2013), Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, Official Journal of the European Union , C 175/01, 20.06.2013.
Andersen, S. & Sitter, N. (2006), ‘Differentiated integration: What is it and how much can the EU accommodate?’ Journal of European Integration , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 313
. Accessed via: http://mime-project.org/resources/MIME-POSITION-PAPER-V4.pdf.
HABERMAS, J. 1994. Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State. Gutmann, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, 107-148.
2008. Notes on Post-Secular Society. New Perspectives Quarterly 25(4): 17-29.
HEHMAN, E.-GAERTNER, S.-DOVIDIO, J.-MANIA, E.-GUERRA, R.-WILSON, D.-FRIEL, B. 2012. Group Status Drives Majority and Minority Integration Preferences. Psychological Science 23(1): 46
The article is a synthetic outlook at Konrad Adenauer’s life, activity and the legacy of that politician, described in a tendentious way in the past period, and nowadays – after a temporary increase in the interest during the first years of systemic transformation – deserving a closer examination. In the initial part of the article, some integration concepts of past centuries have been outlined. Then, in a biographical sketch, Adenauer’s private and public activities were characterized, falling into diverse political periods, ranging from imperial Germany, to the post-war formation of the foundations of a reborn democratic state. His participation in these events is outlined. The main achievements of Adenauer during almost 30 years of work in the Cologne municipality are pointed out and the repressions he suffered during the Nazi regime and his participation in the post-war reconstruction of Germany were discussed: long-term leadership in the CDU and the 14-year period of government as the first chancellor of democratic post-war Germany. It was pointed out that the political line he designated, the active presence of Germany in the uniting Europe, proved to be very stable and continued by his successive successors.
The United Kingdom has had an important position in Europe for centuries. Often it is seen as an anti-European country, or as being anti-integration in Europe but it is just defending its own interests, which in many cases hare differed from other members of the European Communities. The UK policy towards European cooperation has been influenced by the particular interest of the country, but there has always been a strong relation between the British and Europe. Great Britain had the biggest empire in human history spread all over the globe, and hence its interest was global rather than limited to local European states. The UK was a victorious country in the Second World War, the only Western European state that participated actively in Nazi defeat. As an important consequence, British nationalism was seen as a positive force to unite all the British against an external threat. During centuries, the British economy has been based on trade, and internationally the government supported and expanded the free trade idea in the world economy to European trade relations. This paper analyzes the main issues that explain the special relations between the EU and the UK. The paper is developed from a historical point of view with a methodology’ based on the critical review of historical facts from a global perspective of the whole traditional approach of the UK towards European integration.
), ‘Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist
Parties and Euroscepticism,’ Party Politics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 15–28.
Eppink, J. D. (2009), ECR Video Profile. Retrieved from http://ecrgroup.eu/?page_
id=1267 [accessed 10 Aug 2011]
Eriksen, E. O. (2005), ‘Reflexive Integration in Europe,’ in E. O. Eriksen (ed.) Making
the European Polity: Reflexive Integration in the EU, Abingdon: Routledge.
ECR (2011a), European Conservatives and Reformists Group. Party Policy Paper ‘10
Ways the ECR Group Has Made the Citizens Lives Better
(eds), European Integration Theory (Second Edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 25-44.
· Burgess Michael, 2012, In Search of the Federal Spirit: New Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Comparative Federalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
· Christodoulidis Emilios, 2017, ‘Subjects and Technologies of European Governance: Reflections on suspect crossings’, in Bardutzky Samo and Fahey Elaine (eds), Framing the Subjects and Objects of Contemporary EU Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 64 -71.
· Cuyver Armin
Anon, 2009. Communication Strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the NATO Integration Process. Sarajevo.
Anon, n.d. Balkan Regional Approach to Air Defence: Role of NATO, 1st ed, [ebook] NATO C3 Agency. Available at: http://bihnato.files.wordpress.com/20l3/02/nato-role-in-braad_20111128.pdf [accessed 21 May 2014].
Atlantic Initiative, 2011. Attitudes toward NATO in Republika Srpska (RS), Bosnia & Herzegovina (BiH).
Azinović, V., Bassuener, K. and Weber, B., 2011. Assessing the Potential