1. Babula M. Placement of a legally incapacitated person in a social care home, in: Selected aspects of humanrights and bioethics. In: A. Białek, M. Wróblewski (ed). Warszawa: The Ombudsman Office; 2017. p. 143-51.
2. Bomba J. Humanities and respect for humanrights in difficult conditions Psychiatr Pol. 1993:3:225-39.
3. Balicki M. Coercion in psychiatry, regulation and practice. Law Med. 1999:1:40-61.
4. Babiuch H. The scope of parents’ rights to raise a child according to their beliefs. Scientific Papers of the State Higher
Ivana ŠOljan, Željka Josipović-Jelić and Anita Kiš
Workplace mobbing is a hostile and unethical communication, systematically aimed from one or more individuals towards mostly one individual, who are forced into a helpless position and are held in it by constant bullying. This article describes some of the most important characteristics of mobbing: offensive behaviour, organizational and non-organizational causes of this behaviour, the victim, and the consequences. Modern business environment is complex, dynamic, volatile, and requires better ability to adjust. Constant changes are a part of organizational reality, but they also produce an ideal environment for all kinds of conflicts. Conflicts are inevitable in every organization, but the task of its management is to identify them and resolve before they affect the workforce, productivity, and costs. The idea is to avert psychological abuse and aberrant behaviour such as mobbing that may cause physical and mental disorders. Mobbing is a problem of the modern society; as a violation of human rights it is relatively new and unrecognised in Croatia. Abuse is mostly psychological; it affects the victim's health and life, quality of work, productivity, profitability, and may lead to significant economic losses in the community. Mobbing can be averted by joint forces that would involve employees and management, medical and legal professionals, and even community as a whole. The more an organization pursues excellence based on trust and business ethics, the higher the probability that mobbing will be averted or stopped.
Sport for All is a universal Olympic idea adopted by supranational institutions such as the Council of Europe, UNESCO, and the UN. Measures that need to be taken to ensure that all people have an equal opportunity to be included in sport are analyzed and discussed based upon a survey of sports and exercise participation in Denmark with a special focus upon people with impairments. The prevailing point of view is a special needs approach to sports participation, whether it is oriented towards separate or integrated forms of organization. It is often unclear whether this approach is aiming for equality of outcome, equality of chance or just a minimum threshold for sports and exercise activity. However, if we adopt a universal approach to Sport for all, then the focus is not on differences among people, but upon the commonalities among human beings in light of their diversity. This approach is associated with the understanding of “universal design” in the UN‟s Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the WHO‟s International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. In conclusion, it is highlighted that a more inclusive Sport for All movement is preferable to a segregated or integrated disability sport, provided the persons concerned have a say in every case.
, M.C. (2011, March). Abortion, dignity, and a capabilities approach. Retrieved from the Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 345: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/index.html[15-04-2014]
Eichberg, H. (2010). Bodily democracy: Towards a philosophy of Sport for All. New York, NY: Routledge.
Fraleigh, W. (1984). Right Actions in Sport: Ethics for Contestants. Champaign, ILL: Human Kinetics Publisher
Giulianotti, R. (2004). Humanrights, globalization and sentimental education: The case of
, ćelija i tkiva u Srbiji. In Irena Pejic (ed) COLLECTION OF PAPERS FACULTY OF LAW, Faculty of Law, University of Niš, 2012 : 27. (in Serbian)
5. Radevic B. Transplantacija jetre: Zavet, Beograd, 1996. (in Serbian)
6. Convention for the Protection of HumanRights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, Oviedo, 1997. [Internet] Available from: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98.
7. Srbija za transplantaciju. [Internet] Available from: http
umană, CA Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca, 2010, 214-218.
5. Hampson FO. Human Security, in Williams P (eds): Security Studies. An Introduction, Routledge, NY, 2008, 238-240.
6. Tim D, Wheeler JN. We the Peoples’: Contending Discourses of Security in HumanRights Theory and Practice in David C, Hynek N (eds): Critical perspectives on Human Security. Rethinking Emancipation and Power in International Relations, Routledge, London and NY, 2011, 20-22.
7. Leucea I. Constructivism și securitate umană. European Institute Iași, 2013, 122-123.
8. David R
Eva Forsom, Lene Warner Thorup Boel, Bo Jaque and Lene Mollerup
] Lynnerup N., Petersen H.C., Alexandersen, V. Antropometri, In: Lynnerup N., Bennike P., Iregren E. (Eds.), Biologisk Antropologi med human osteologi, Gyldendal, København, 2008, 97-110
 Sauer N., The timing of injuries and manner of death: distinguishing among antemortem, perimortem, and postmortem trauma, In: Reichs K. (Ed.), Forensic Osteology Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, 2nd ed., Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, 1998, 321-332
 Kimmerle E.H., Baraybar J.P., Skeletal trauma. Identification of injuries resulting from humanrights
: 57- 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.3.57
18. Zhang JY, Dai M, Wang X et al. A case-control study of hepatitis B and C virus infection as risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in Henan, China Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:574-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/27.4.574
19. Semnani S, Roshandel G, Abdolahi N et al.Hepatitis B/ C virus co-infection in Iran: A seroepidemiological study. Turk J Gastroenterol 2007; 18 (1): 20-1.
20. Jelic M, Lukic Samardzija G, Obradovic M, Markovic Z. Prisons in Serbia – April 2005 – April 2006. Helsinki Committee for HumanRights
force on ethics and law 11: posthumous assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 3050-3053.
25. Kruger M. The prohibition of post-mortem-fertilization, legal situation in Germany and European Convention on humanrights. Revue Int Droit Penal 2011; 82: 41-64.
26. Chatzinikolaou N. The ethics of assisted reproduction. J Reprod Immunol 2010; 85: 3-8.
27. Le Coz P. Respecter l’’embryon humain? In: Lois de bioethique: reexamen, enjeux et debats. Paris: La documentation Francaise, 2009; 49-61.
28. Landau R
Marina Kostić, Biljana Kocić and Lidija Popović Dragonjić
19. Semnani S, Roshandel G, Abdolahi N et al. Hepatitis B/C virus co-infection in Iran: A seroepidemiological study. Turk J Gastroenterol 2007; 18 (1): 20-1.
20. Jelic M, Lukic Samardzija G, Obradovic M, Markovic Z. Prisons in Serbia - April 2005 - April 2006. Helsinki Committee for HumanRights in Serbia. Belgrade, 2006: 14-8.
21. Javadi AA, Avijgan M, Hafizi M. Prevalence of HBV and HCV infections and associated risk factors in addict prisoners. Iranian J Publ Health, 2006; 35 (4