Ewelina Żmijewska, Dariusz Teper, Anna Linkiewicz and Sławomir Sowa
Ancel V., Bellocchi G., Berben G., Bertheau Y., Brera C., De Giacomo M., Janssen E., Kobilinsky A., Kozjak P., Macarthur R., Miraglia M., Onori R., Pia M., Papazova N., Rutar R., Taverniers I., Šuštar Vozlic J. (2009) GMO sampling strategies in the food and feed chain. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on GM and non-GM supply chains: their coexistence and traceability. Paris, France. 2-5 June 2009. pp. 35-37.
Bellocchi G., Ermolli M., Savini C., van den Eede G. (2009) GMO testing methods
Mariola Galbas, Kamila Borys, Anna Woźniak and Marek Selwet
Impact of Globulins Derived from Genetically Modified and Conventional Soybean on Swine Lymphocyte Proliferation in in vitro Cultures
The majority of the global feed market is dominated by the Roundup Ready 40-3-2 transgenic soybean varieties developed and marketed by Monsanto Company, which are characterized by tolerance to glyphosate, the active ingredient of the Roundup herbicide. It should be remembered, however, that soybean is one of the major allergens which may affect animal health. The aim of the study was to compare allergenic properties of globulins derived from genetically modified (GM) soybean imported from the USA and conventional soybean developed in Poland. Analyses were performed by measuring porcine lymphocyte proliferation in in vitro cultures. It turned out that both genetically modified and conventional soybean proteins caused immune response at the level of negative control. A slight increase in relation to the negative control was observed in the case of 7S and 11S fractions derived from the GM meal and 7S fraction isolated from Nawiko meal.
Barbara Tokarska-Guzik, Katarzyna Bzdęga, Katarzyna Koszela, Izabela Żabińska, Barbara Krzuś, Małgorzata Sajan and Agnieszka Sendek
results in Hungary: III. Resistant Biotypes, control methods and authority arrangements. Herbologia 9(1): 119-144.
Laaidi M., Thibaudon M. & Besancenot J. P. 2003. Two statistical approaches to forecasting the start and duration of the pollen season of Ambrosia in the area of Lyon (France). Int. J. Biometeorol. 48: 65-73.
von der Lippe M. & Kowarik I. 2007. Crop seed spillage along roads: a factor of uncertainty in the containment of GMO. Ecography 30: 483-490.
Mack R. N., Simberloff D
Rafal Baranski, Magdalena Klimek-Chodacka and Aneta Lukasiewicz
ABCA, 2012. GM carnations in Australia: a resource guide. http://www.abca.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ABCA_Resource_Guide_2_v2.pdf . Accessed 18 January 2018.
ACBIO, 2013. GM industry called to account: ISAAA’s report mischievous and erroneous. African Centre for Biosafety. https://acbio.org.za/gm-industry-called-to-account-isaaas-report-mischievous-and-erroneous . Accessed 1 October 2017.
AFCD, 2015. Review of the exemption of genetically modified papayas in Hong Kong. Discussion Paper GMO 04/2015. Agriculture, Fisheries and
Piotr Micek, Zygmunt M. Kowalski, Bogdan Kulig and Jarosław Kański
Grassland Association, Helsinki, pp. 438-441.
Vindis P., Mursec B., Janzekovic M., C u s F. (2007). Processing of soybean meal into concentrates and testing for genetically modified organism (GMO). J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng., 20: 507-510.
, KNEŽEVIĆ D, PETROVIĆ S, ZEČEVIĆ V: Variability and stability of harvest index in wheat. Kragujevac J. Sci., 91-96, 2002.
DIMITRIJEVIĆ, M., PETROVIĆ S: GMO - products of novel technology questions and dilemmas. ESNA European society for new methods in agricultural research, Novi Sad, 29. 08. – 2. 09. 2004. Proceedings 29 – 36, 2004.
DIMITRIJEVIĆ M, PETROVIĆ S: GMO - Evolution Under Control or Frankengene Technology. Contemporary Agriculture, 1-2, 287-291, 2005.
DIMITRIJEVIĆ, M. and PETROVIĆ S: Genetic modification in function of ecologically justified