://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ez/index.html Malaga, R. A. (2000). The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Decision Support Systems, 29(2), 125-141. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-Based Measures of CreativeProblem-Solving Skills: I. Problem Construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 63-76. Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition
References 1. Amabile Teresa M. (1996), Creativity in Context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity, Avalon Publishing, New York 2. Christensen Thomas (2010), Thoroughbass as music theory, in: Thomas Christensen, Robert Guerdoned, Giorgio Sanguinetti, Rudolf Lutz (eds.) (2010), Portamentos and Continuo Playing, Leuven University Press, Leuven, 9-42 3. Couger T. Daniel (1995), CreativeProblemSolving and Opportunity Finding, Boyd & Fraser Publishing, San Francisco 4. Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly (1996), Creativity: Flow and The Psychology of Discovery and
The ability to communicate complex meanings is a specific human ability which plays a crucial role in social interactions. A habitual example of these interactions is conversation. However, we observe that spontaneous conversation often hits an impasse when none of the interlocutors immediately produces a follow-up utterance. The existence of impasses in conversations, and the way that interlocutors overcome them provide evidence for our argument that conversation is a sequence of creative problem solving. In this work we use techniques from Conversation Analysis (CA) on publicly available databases of naturally-occurring speech and we suggest a framework to understand how impasses are reached and overcome. As a result, we hope to reveal yet another instance of the bond between language and creativity.
REFERENCES Abykanova, B., Bilyalova, Z., Makhatova, V., Idrissov, S., & Nugumanova, S. (2016). Psychological and pedagogic conditions of activating creative activity in students for successful learning, International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education , 11 (10), 3333-3343. Althuizen, N., & Reichel, A. (2016). The Effects of IT-Enabled Cognitive Stimulation Tools on CreativeProblemSolving: A Dual Pathway to Creativity. Journal of Management Information Systems , 33 (1), 11-44. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York
Abstracts International Section A , 54 , 3700. Arlin, P. K. (1975a). A Cognitive process model of problem finding. Educational Horizons , Winter , 99-106. Arlin, P. K. (1975b). Cognitive development in adulthood: A fifth stage?. Developmental Psychology , 11 (5), 602-606. Arlin, P. K. (1977). Piagetian operations in problem finding. Developmental Psychology , 13 (3), 297-298. Arreola, N. J. (2012). The influence of personality on problem construction and creativeproblemsolving (unpublished master thesis). University of Nebraska at Omaha, NE. Ayas, M. B., & Sak
The paper describes creativity in role context and how drama features and techniques can stimulate creative thinking. The first part of the article concerns the role of drama as a stimulator by encasing the participant in fiction. Aspects of development are also taken into account and the areas of differences in the use of drama at various stages of development, and thus at different stages of education are highlighted. The second part of the paper is devoted to drama techniques - heuristics based on taking on a role. The last part of the article describes how drama stimulates the process of solving problems and delineates its specificity.
://dx.doi.org/10.3998/dialectic.14932326.0001.208 Jausovec, N. (1994). Metacognition in creativeproblemsolving. In Runco, M. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving and creativity (pp. 77-95). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121-146. John-Steiner, V. (1985). Notebooks of the mind. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2005). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. Mahwah, NJ
brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 175-184. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance . New York, NY: Prentice Hall. Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: People people desire yet reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13-17. Nemiro, J. (2002). The creative process in virtual teams. Creativity Research Journal , 14, 69-83. Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creativeproblem-solving. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Parnes, S. J
. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts , 11 , 309-324. Katz-Buonincontro, J., & Anderson, R. C. (2018). A review of articles using observation methods to study creativity in education (1980–2018). Journal of Creative Behavior . Kaufman, James C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology , 13 , 1-12. Loesche, F., Goslin, J., & Bugmann, G. (2018). Paving the way to eureka-Introducing “Dira” as an experimental paradigm to observe the process of creativeproblemsolving. Frontiers in